Job Position Review and Appeal Process Sample Clauses

Job Position Review and Appeal Process. Effective FY 2022, a bargaining unit employee may request a formal review of their position classification and/or salary grade placement according to the following procedure: A. On or before January 15th of each year, the Human Resources Department will provide notification to all bargaining unit members to return the formal job position questionnaire completed, and signed, to the Chief Human Resources Officer by February 15th of the same calendar year. The questionnaire will be available in the College Portal and included in Appendix C. B. The employee must complete the position questionnaire and meet with their immediate administrative supervisor to review the document which will include an area for them to indicate whether or not they support the request. The immediate supervisor has the responsibility to meet with their appropriate manager and/or President’s Cabinet member to review the form prior to the submission to HR. The supervisor’s manager and/or President’s Cabinet member should also indicate whether or not they support the request. C. The employee must include with or on the form: 1. Evidence of substantial changes in the position duties and responsibilities; 2. Evidence of the employee’s qualifications to meet the changes in the duties and responsibilities which shall be ongoing. D. The Human Resources Department will review all reclassifications/upgrades received by the deadline, including those not supported at the supervisor, supervisor’s manager, and/or President’s Cabinet member level, and will provide its evaluation/recommendations on each submission to the President’s Cabinet by May 1st. The President’s Cabinet will review the information and provide its decision on upgrade requests to the HR Department. The President’s Cabinet member will communicate the response to the employee and their supervisor by June 1st of the same calendar year. E. If a request is denied by the President’s Cabinet, the employee may request an appeal meeting with the appropriate President’s Cabinet member by completing the Upgrade/Reclassification Appeal form in Appendix D. The meeting may include a Union representative, if requested, and their immediate supervisor. If the President’s Cabinet member approves and supports the appeal, the appeal will be sent to HR for a final compensation analysis. If the request is denied after the appeal review, a discussion will be held with the employee, the supervisor, and the appropriate President’s Cabinet member to provi...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Position Review and Appeal Process. A bargaining unit employee may request a formal review of his/her position classification and/or salary grade placement according to the following procedure: A. On or before March 5 of each year, the Human Resources Department will provide notification to all bargaining unit members to return the formal job position questionnaire, completed, and signed, to the Executive Director, Human Resources by March 20 of the same calendar year. The questionnaire will be available in the College Portal and included in Appendix C. B. The employee must complete the position questionnaire and meet with his/her immediate administrative supervisor to review the document which will include an area for them to indicate whether or not they support the request. The immediate supervisor has the responsibility to meet with their appropriate manager and/or Vice-President to review the form prior to the submission to HR. The supervisor’s manager and/or Vice President should also indicate whether or not they support the request. C. The employee must include with or on the form: 1. Evidence of substantial changes in the position duties and responsibilities; 2. Evidence of the employee’s qualifications to meet the changes in the duties and responsibilities which shall be ongoing. D. The Human Resources Department will review all reclassifications/upgrades received by the deadline, including those not supported at the supervisor, supervisor’s manager, and/or Vice-President level, and will provide its evaluation/recommendations on each submission to the SLT. The SLT will review the information and provide its decision on upgrade requests to the HR Department. The SLT member will communicate the response to the employee and his/her supervisor by July 1 of the same calendar year.

Related to Job Position Review and Appeal Process

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!