Measure 2. Actual and proposed budgets for each school year will demonstrate effective allocation of resources.
Measure 2. If the school’s first-year CCRPI score is lower than either or both the local district and the State, the school shall have until the end of Year 2 of the charter term to close the gap between the Charter School and whichever score is higher, the local district or the State.
Measure 2. During each year of its charter term, the percentage of students scoring in the Advanced/Honors categories on the Mathematics and English Language Arts portions of the GHSGT will exceed the baseline established in Year 1 by an additional 1% per year.
Measure 2. During each year of the charter term, the Charter School will track and adapt strategies to recruit a larger number of diverse candidates, including, but not limited to, direct recruiting of graduates from HBCUs and the use of the Georgia Charter School Association Job Fair.
Measure 2. During each year of the charter term, the Charter School will demonstrate growth and increased rigor on the CRCT by increasing the percentage of students scoring in the “Exceeds” category by 2% annually.
Measure 2. The Charter School will increase the number of students in work-based learning programs by 2% during each year of its charter term.
Measure 2. During each year of the charter term, the percentage of students who meet or exceed state standards on each content area of the CRCT will be greater than the local district Average by at least 2% in all subjects in all grade levels.
Measure 2. The Head of Enterprise, together with relevant XXX executives, is required to draw up a proposal for Measure 2 Programmes for the coming year, including estimated expenditure proposed. The XXX must have regard to and comply with National Eligibility Rules and National Procurement Guidelines when determining proposed Measure 2 activities. The following procedure shall be generally adapted for the implementation of Measure 2 activities: Each Measure 2 activity shall be assigned a reference code to correspond with the LEO’s internal system in completing and returning B1 forms. All trainers engaged by the XXX in the delivery of Measure 2 Programmes shall be recruited via a tendering process in line with the national thresholds for the procurement of supplies and services. Mentors shall be recruited by way of a Mentor Panel, which is at the discretion of each XXX to engage mentors by way of an application and evaluation process on a yearly basis. However, the Head of Enterprise has discretion to add mentors, where specific needs arise during the year. The XXX executive shall assess the request for Measure 2 assistance (under other programmes with the exception of training requests) and determine eligibility. This may, in some cases, require a meeting with the client to discuss the support in more detail and/or assist in the completion of the appropriate application form. The Head of Enterprise shall ensure that the purpose of the approved Measure 2 assistance is consistent with the overall objective of the Measure funding the project. The Head of Enterprise shall ensure that there has been no overlapping of EU aid at transaction level and that the requirements in relation to monitoring and compliance of ‘De Minimis Aid’ provisions have been complied with. All clients supported by Measure 2 funding shall be updated on the GMIS. Measure 2 Programmes shall be monitored on an ongoing basis. Evidence of proof of payment to the suppliers of Measure 2 Training/Development must be made available for audit purposes.
Measure 2. 1 – Protection and Enhancement of the Marine and Coastal Environment The objective of this Measure is the enhancement, prevention and protection of the coast also through joint management of the marine and coastal environment and of common risks. The Measure aims to support intervention to protect the costal heri- tage to ensure revitalization and rebalancing of the coastal area and the marine environment while pursuing sustainable tourism as a key to the development of the area. The support aims to protect marine and coastal ecosystems which are fragmented, highly vulnerable and under considerable anthro- pomorphic pressure, through the development of protected zones (Integrated Coastal Zone Management – ICZM). The measure is in line with the main policy directions for further promotion on ICZM in Europe set out by the EC in COM 2007 (308) of the 7 of June 2007 and will take fully account of the INSPIRE System (Infrastructure for Spatial InfoRmation in Europe) and the GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security). Progra- mme Expected beneficiaries: Public Bodies, Research centres Examples of possible initiatives are: – Reinforcing Local Authority competence in the joint manage- ment of the marine and coastal environment also through the promotion of a common planning policy; – Implementation of specific studies of the coastal environmental system; – Developing common instruments for integrated coastal zone ma- nagement; – Marine-coastal environment monitoring also through a joint Ge- ographical Information System (GIS); – Joint projects for the protection of inland water from widespread pollution, from alien and invasive species and the control of sea water quality; – Strengthening of ecological systems and protection of biodiversi- ty to improve environmental quality and the promotion of eco- nomic and social sustainable development; – Prevention of coastal erosion; – Scientific researches to improve sustainable and responsible use of marine food resources to guarantee food supply quality; – protection of the NATURA 2000 sites.
Measure 2. 2 – Natural and Cultural Resource Management and Prevention of Natural and Technological Risks The objective of this Measure is to strengthen institutional capa- city for preservation and management of territorial resources and prevention of risk and mitigation of accidents through territorial cooperation. It is important to propose promotion and preservation strategies for the natural and cultural heritage in the Area; as it is a strategic resource of vast importance for developing sustainable tourism. The cultural and natural heritage of this territory is of especial particular environmental, historical, architectural and cultural interest, and is still not widely well known. Social and economic analysis of the area eligible under the Progra- mme has nevertheless shown the presence of threats which if not dealt with promptly, may be an obstacle to the development of the territory. Such resources provide an important development oppor- tunity and not only from tourism.
