Member Selection Process Sample Clauses

Member Selection Process. The service site will work jointly with assigned Program Staff in interviewing, selecting, and placing Opportunity Corps members during spring/summer 2017.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Member Selection Process. The Host Site agrees to work jointly with Alliance staff in interviewing, selecting, and confirming AmeriCorps Promise Fellows with sites. Please note that applicants MUST complete an online application and screening interview with the Alliance before a conditional offer of a placement at a site can be made, and the official offer of a position must be made by the Alliance. Minnesota Alliance With Youth staff reserves the right to make the final decision regarding the selection of AmeriCorps members. DRAFT The Alliance strives to have each Promise Fellow position filled and confirmed before the start of the program on September 1st. Members may only begin accruing hours after their start date once they have successfully completed the enrollment process (including submitting eligibility documents and completing the Member Agreement), passed extensive background checks (including FBI fingerprinting), and have been confirmed by the Alliance. Host Sites must confirm their final candidates using the Alliance’s recruitment system by the dates communicated. The Alliance will confirm a member’s start date based on the necessary onboarding timeline. The Alliance partners with Host Sites to achieve our goal of 100% retention of Promise Fellows. The Host Site may not hire an AmeriCorps member as a staff person during their term of service if doing so would not allow the member to fulfill their responsibilities as an AmeriCorps member. Host Sites will be asked to determine a specific, primary service location for each member upon selection that will be used for their official AmeriCorps enrollment. Once a service site has been confirmed, sites cannot relocate members without pre-approval from the Alliance. Sites must work with the Alliance to request any transfers, or changes in primary or addition of service locations throughout the term.
Member Selection Process. Alliance staff will work in conjunction with the partnering Host Site in interviewing, selecting, and placing AmeriCorps members. Minnesota Alliance With Youth staff reserves the right to make the final decision regarding the selection of AmeriCorps members; all positions are contingent upon members successfully passing all background checks and meeting all eligibility requirements. Once a final candidate is selected by the Host Site, the Alliance will make the official offer for the position; all final candidates must have successfully completed a program application including Alliance phone interview and any Host Site application steps. As part of the screening process, Alliance staff will conduct all required AmeriCorps National Service Criminal History background checks on applicants prior to their official enrollment into the program. Promise Fellow positions are contingent on these results; the Alliance reserves the right to disqualify a member for not disclosing past criminal history on the application or for not clearing the background check. The Alliance will only communicate to the Host Site a member’s eligibility for service based on the below criteria. An individual is ineligible to serve in an AmeriCorps program if they:
Member Selection Process. The Program Staff will work together with the service site in interviewing, selecting, and placing MORe Corps members during until each awarded position has been filled.
Member Selection Process 

Related to Member Selection Process

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Mediation Process A. Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that may be requested by the City or the PBA. It is an alternative, not a substitute for the formal arbitration process contained in Section 19.7 above. Mediation is an informal process in which a neutral third party assists the opposing parties in reaching a voluntary, negotiated resolution of a charge of discipline. The decision to mediate is completely voluntary for the PBA and the City. Mediation gives the parties the opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the charging document, clear up misunderstandings, determine the underlying interests or concerns, find areas of agreement and, ultimately, incorporate those areas of agreement into solutions. A mediator does not resolve the charge or impose a decision on the parties. Instead, the mediator helps the parties to agree on a mutually acceptable resolution. The mediation process is strictly confidential. Information disclosed during mediation will not be revealed to anyone.

  • Panel Selection 1. The Parties shall apply the following procedures in selecting a Panel: (a) the Panel shall comprise 3 members; (b) within 15 days following the date of the establishment of the Panel, each Party shall nominate a Panelist; (c) the Parties shall endeavor

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • Escalation Process 9.1. There will be times when the pharmacist will need additional advice or will need to escalate the patient to a higher acuity care location (e.g. back to their GP or an Urgent Treatment Centre or A&E).

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Induction Procedures a) The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that it is in the interests of the industry that all new employees and employers on a building project understand their obligations to this Agreement and are introduced to their jobs in a manner which will help them work safely and efficiently.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.