Model 2 Sample Clauses

Model 2. If a person who is in the territory of the requested Party has to be heard as a witness or expert by a competent authority of the requesting Party, an application may be made for his hearing to take place by videoconference.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Model 2. The central authority of the requested Party and the central authority of the requesting Party or Eurojust may decide by mutual consent to set up joint investigation teams to carry out criminal investigations in the territory of one or other of the Parties setting up the team.
Sample 1
Model 2. At the request of the requesting Party and without prejudice to the rights of bona fide third parties, the requested Party may place articles obtained by criminal means at the disposal of the requesting Party with a view to their return to their rightful owners.
Sample 1
Model 2. Vapour exposure‌ 7.2.1 Model outline & basic concepts‌ The emission of vapour into the air after spraying the plant protection product on the crop or soil is computed by the PEARL model (Pesticide Emission Assessment at Regional and Local scales). The version of PEARL for BROWSE is based on the PEARL version currently being used (i.e. FOCUS_PEARL_444) to assess leaching to groundwater in the registration procedure at the EU level. This version includes the improved description of the volatilisation of plant protection products from crops as well as the description of competing processes on the plant surface, such as penetration into the plant tissue, wash-off and photo-transformation (Xxx xxx Xxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2004). Moreover, this version has an option to read meteorological data on an hourly basis, so the volatilisation can be assessed on an hourly basis. The PEARL model has been coupled to the atmospheric dispersion model OPS (Operational Atmospheric Transport Model for Priority Substances) that simulates atmospheric concentration and dry deposition of pollutants in a given area of interest. OPS simulates the atmospheric process sequence of dispersion, transport, chemical conversion and finally deposition (Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, 2004). The special high-resolution model version of OPS used for the BROWSE Scenarios, OPS-St (St for Short term) allows hour-to-hour variations in emissions to be included (Van Pul, Xxxxxxxxx, X X, xxx xxx Xxxxx, & Xxxxx, 2008). OPS has been set up as a universal framework supporting the modeling of a wide variety of pollutants and specific applications. OPS-St is able to compute the concentration at hourly time steps, using a variable surface source strength. The output is computed for receptor points to be specified by the user. The simulations take into account 1) the source characteristics and strength; 2) the meteorological conditions; 3) local land cover and land use in the area and at the specific receptor points. For BROWSE, the improved PEARL model was coupled to OPS-St to enable the prediction of time-dependent air concentrations at an hourly resolution at locations around and within the source field. The coupled Pearl-OPS model determines the concentration at two heights for the layout and locations shown in Figure 3. Further details of Pearl are given in Appendix 2. The conceptual model for the interaction between the airborne vapour and the resident or bystander is the same as is used for spray drift (Figure 2) but includes ...
Sample 1

Related to Model 2

  • Model List your model number of the product you are bidding.

  • CFR 200 328. Failure to submit such required Performance Reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq.

  • Year 2000 Issues Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries has made a full and complete assessment of the Year 2000 Issues and has a realistic and achievable program for remediating the Year 2000 Issues on a timely basis. Based on such assessment and program, the Borrower does not reasonably anticipate that Year 2000 Issues will have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Year 2000 Compatibility Take all action necessary to assure that its computer based systems are able to operate and effectively process data including dates on and after January 1, 2000, and, at the reasonable request of the Administrative Agent or the Required Lenders, provide evidence to the Lenders of such year 2000 compatibility.

  • Configuration The configuration for the Purchase Right Aircraft will be the Detail Specification for Model 767-3S2F aircraft at the revision level in effect at the time of the Supplemental Agreement. Such Detail Specification will be revised to include (i) changes required to obtain required regulatory certificates and (ii) other changes as mutually agreed upon by Boeing and Customer.

  • AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION The guarantees defined below (the “Guarantees”) are applicable to the A319-100 Aircraft as described in the Standard Specification Ref. J 000 01000 Issue 6 dated 1st March 2007 equipped with:

  • Workload An employee who believes that her workload is unsafe or consistently excessive shall discuss the problem with her immediate supervisor. If the problem is not resolved in this discussion, the employee may seek a remedy by means of the grievance procedure. If the matter is not resolved in the grievance procedure, it may be referred to troubleshooter who shall: a) investigate the difference; b) define the issue in the difference; and c) make written recommendations to resolve the differences.

  • Power System Stabilizers The Developer shall procure, install, maintain and operate Power System Stabilizers in accordance with the requirements identified in the Interconnection Studies conducted for Developer’s Large Generating Facility. NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner reserve the right to reasonably establish minimum acceptable settings for any installed Power System Stabilizers, subject to the design and operating limitations of the Large Generating Facility. If the Large Generating Facility’s Power System Stabilizers are removed from service or not capable of automatic operation, the Developer shall immediately notify the Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO. The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.

  • Year 2000 The Borrower has made a full and complete assessment of the Year 2000 Issues and has a realistic and achievable program for remediating the Year 2000 Issues on a timely basis (the "Year 2000 Program"). Based on such assessment and on the Year 2000 Program the Borrower does not reasonably anticipate that Year 2000 Issues will have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!