Peer Review Option Sample Clauses

Peer Review Option. If the Union timely seeks in writing a review of the discharge or discipline under this Peer Review Option, UTA may agree to submit the discharge or discipline to review under the Peer Review Option within three business days after receipt of the Union’s written request. If UTA does not agree to submit the discharge or discipline to review under the Peer Review Option, the discharge or discipline will be reviewed under the Preliminary Hearing Option. If UTA agrees to submit the discharge or discipline to review under the Peer Review Option, the Union and UTA will, within seven calendar days after the date of UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option, submit in writing to the Labor Relations Office initial arguments of each party for review and consideration by the Peer Review Committee. The Union and UTA will also provide a copy of any such arguments to the other party within seven calendar days after the date of UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option. Within 14 calendar days after the date of UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option, the Union and UTA will submit in writing to the Labor Relations Office, and to the other party, a response to the other party’s initial arguments, for review and consideration by the Peer Review Committee. Within 21 calendar days after UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option, UTA will convene a Peer Review Committee (“PRC”) to review the discharge or discipline. The PRC will issue a written decision within 35 calendar days after UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option. The PRC will be comprised of eight members. Four of the members will be UTA employees appointed by the Union, and four of the members will be UTA employees appointed by UTA. Any employee appointed to the PRC will be employed in either Parts, Bus Operations, Bus Maintenance, or Rail Service, and will be trained to serve on the PRC. The Union and UTA may, as needed, appoint equal numbers of UTA employees to serve as standby PRC members who may be available to serve as voting members of the PRC in the event of sudden or long-term unavailability of members otherwise appointed under this paragraph. The terms of the members will be at staggered intervals. Two Union-appointed members and two UTA-appointed members will serve two-year terms. Two Union-appointed members and two UTA-appointed members will serve one-year terms. Upon the expiration of the term of any member, that member’s successor will be appointed for a term of t...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Peer Review Option. A Peer Review Panel consisting of two bargaining unit members and one management representative shall be appointed. Upon mutual written agreement of both management and the union, a grievance, or a dispute which may become a grievance may be reviewed and decided by the Peer Review Panel, except that disciplinary matters involving a suspension or discharge or any grievance that seeks a monetary remedy in excess of $500.00, shall not be subject to review by the Peer Review Panel. The decision of the peer review panel shall be made by a majority of the panel members and shall be binding on the parties without further review or appeal. The panel shall issue its decision without record of the vote of an individual member. If a dispute or grievance is denied, the decision shall be reported as “denied.” If a dispute or grievance is decided in favor of the employee or the union, the decision shall be reported as “granted” and the appropriate remedy shall be ordered, provided that the panel cannot order an award having a total cost to the county in excess of $500.00.
Sample 1
Peer Review Option. A Peer Review Panel consisting of two bargaining unit members and one management representative shall be appointed. Upon mutual written agreement of both management and the union, a grievance, or a dispute which may become a grievance may be reviewed and decided by the Peer Review Panel, except that disciplinary matters involving a suspension or discharge or any grievance that seeks a monetary remedy in excess of $500.00, shall not be subject to review by the Peer Review
Sample 1

Related to Peer Review Option

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Training Objectives It is important that the objectives for the employee(s) enrolling in this course or program is related to the strategic objectives of the organization for which the employee works. Provide text to explain how the training event meets agency objective(s) and purpose type.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Program Objective The objectives of the Department’s grants are to:

  • Target Audience The target audience for this policy includes, but is not limited to, all faculty, trainees/students, and other members of MD Anderson’s workforce, including Facilities Management (FM) Project Managers, FM Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Staff, Contractors, and Stakeholders who request a Scheduled Utility Outage for: • New construction. • Renovation. • Maintenance.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.