Peer Review Option Sample Clauses

Peer Review Option. If the Union timely seeks in writing a review of the discharge or discipline under this Peer Review Option, UTA may agree to submit the discharge or discipline to review under the Peer Review Option within three business days after receipt of the Union’s written request. If UTA does not agree to submit the discharge or discipline to review under the Peer Review Option, the discharge or discipline will be reviewed under the Preliminary Hearing Option. If UTA agrees to submit the discharge or discipline to review under the Peer Review Option, the Union and UTA will, within seven calendar days after the date of UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option, submit in writing to the Labor Relations Office initial arguments of each party for review and consideration by the Peer Review Committee. The Union and UTA will also provide a copy of any such arguments to the other party within seven calendar days after the date of UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option. Within 14 calendar days after the date of UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option, the Union and UTA will submit in writing to the Labor Relations Office, and to the other party, a response to the other party’s initial arguments, for review and consideration by the Peer Review Committee. Within 21 calendar days after UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option, UTA will convene a Peer Review Committee (“PRC”) to review the discharge or discipline. The PRC will issue a written decision within 35 calendar days after UTA’s written notice of agreement to this Option. The PRC will be comprised of eight members. Four of the members will be UTA employees appointed by the Union, and four of the members will be UTA employees appointed by UTA. Any employee appointed to the PRC will be employed in either Parts, Bus Operations, Bus Maintenance, or Rail Service, and will be trained to serve on the PRC. The Union and UTA may, as needed, appoint equal numbers of UTA employees to serve as standby PRC members who may be available to serve as voting members of the PRC in the event of sudden or long-term unavailability of members otherwise appointed under this paragraph. The terms of the members will be at staggered intervals. Two Union-appointed members and two UTA-appointed members will serve two-year terms. Two Union-appointed members and two UTA-appointed members will serve one-year terms. Upon the expiration of the term of any member, that member’s successor will be appointed for a term of t...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Peer Review Option. A Peer Review Panel consisting of two bargaining unit members and one management representative shall be appointed. Upon mutual written agreement of both management and the union, a grievance, or a dispute which may become a grievance may be reviewed and decided by the Peer Review Panel, except that disciplinary matters involving a suspension or discharge or any grievance that seeks a monetary remedy in excess of $500.00, shall not be subject to review by the Peer Review
Sample 1
Peer Review Option. A Peer Review Panel consisting of two bargaining unit members and one management representative shall be appointed. Upon mutual written agreement of both management and the union, a grievance, or a dispute which may become a grievance may be reviewed and decided by the Peer Review Panel, except that disciplinary matters involving a suspension or discharge or any grievance that seeks a monetary remedy in excess of $500.00, shall not be subject to review by the Peer Review Panel. The decision of the peer review panel shall be made by a majority of the panel members and shall be binding on the parties without further review or appeal. The panel shall issue its decision without record of the vote of an individual member. If a dispute or grievance is denied, the decision shall be reported as “denied.” If a dispute or grievance is decided in favor of the employee or the union, the decision shall be reported as “granted” and the appropriate remedy shall be ordered, provided that the panel cannot order an award having a total cost to the county in excess of $500.00.
Sample 1

Related to Peer Review Option

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Appraisal The employee's performance will be rated by his/her immediate excluded supervisor. The rater shall discuss the performance appraisal with the employee. The employee shall have the opportunity to provide his/her comments to be attached to the performance appraisal. The employee shall sign the performance appraisal and that signature shall only indicate that the employee has read the performance appraisal. A copy shall be provided the employee at this time.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Evaluation Committee 16.2.1 The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Development Committee for the purpose of regularly reviewing the effectiveness of the policy, procedure and process, including the evaluation instrument, for the evaluation of teachers in the District and to provide recommendations to the Superintendent and Board by April 30.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!