Post Tenure Reviews Sample Clauses

Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the xxxx and xxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.D: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports for the evaluation period; 2. Examples of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the division chair or their designee (or equivalent review of on- line Learning Management System (LMS) platform material if primarily an on-line instructor); 4. An updated CV; and 5. Data from the mutually agreed upon student course evaluation instrument (SCEI*), provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-5 are forwarded to the college xxxx for acceptance and review. Each xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated once every three years by the DPRC with recommendations made to the Xxxx, Xxxxxxx and President. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; -0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Every three years, tenured faculty members will submit the following to the respective Division Chair and DPRC by the first week of June: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports from the three prior years; 2. Examples of teaching, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the Division Chair or their designee; and 4. Comparative data from SIR data of classroom performance provided by the University. D. The DPRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7, C.1-4 are forwarded to the College Xxxx for acceptance and review. Each Xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the Xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the faculty member’s permanent personnel records.
Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty will be evaluated once every three years by the Division PRC with recommendations made to the Xxxx, Xxxxxxx and President. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140) C. Every three years, tenured faculty will submit to the Division Chairs and PRCs the following by the 1st week of June: 1. Copies of the Annual Faculty Reports from the three prior years; 2. Examples of teaching, scholarship, and service that define their continued contributions to the profession; 3. Copies of the written summary of at least one observation of classroom teaching by the Division Chair or their designee; and 4. Comparative data from SIR data of classroom performance provided by the University. D. The PRC recommendation and the material provided under Article 8, Section 7 (C) are forwarded to the College Xxxx for acceptance and review. Each Xxxx will provide written feedback to be shared with the faculty member and forward a summary along with the Annual Faculty Report to the Xxxxxxx which will then become a part of the permanent personnel records.
Post Tenure Reviews. A. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by the DPRC once every three years for associate professors and every five years for full professors, with recommendations made to the Xxxx and Xxxxxxx. Such evaluations will be on a staggered basis across faculty within a Division determined at the beginning of each academic year. B. The purposes of post-tenure review are to: 1. Assure continued excellence in the academy; 2. Offer appropriate feedback and professional development opportunities to tenured faculty; 3. Clearly link the level of remuneration to faculty members’ performance; 4. Provide accountability to the institution, public, and Board (OAR 580-021- 0140; - 0135; -005 et seq.; IMD 4.002). C. Tenured faculty members will submit the following according to “PRC process deadlines” in Section 6.D.:

Related to Post Tenure Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Literature Review A-E shall conduct a literature review to determine which species have been identified as special status by state, federal, and local resources agencies and organizations, and have a potential to occur on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. Sources to be reviewed include: (1) special status species lists from the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and California Native Plant Society (CNPS); (2) database searches of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the Electronic Inventory of the CNPS; (3) the most recent Federal Register listing package and critical habitat determination for each federally Endangered or Threatened species potentially occurring on the project site; (4) the CDFG Annual Report on the status of California’s listed Threatened and Endangered plants and animals; and (5) other biological studies conducted in the vicinity of the project site.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the Funder or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the Funder or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to: inspect and copy any financial records, invoices and other finance- related documents, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding or otherwise to the Services; and inspect and copy non-financial records, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding, the Services or otherwise to the performance of the HSP under this Agreement. (b) The cost of any Review will be borne by the HSP if the Review: (1) was made necessary because the HSP did not comply with a requirement under the Enabling Legislation or this Agreement; or (2) indicates that the HSP has not fulfilled its obligations under this Agreement, including its obligations under Applicable Law and Applicable Policy. (c) To assist in respect of the rights set out in (a) above, the HSP shall disclose any information requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives and shall do so in a form requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives. (d) The HSP may not commence a proceeding for damages or otherwise against any person with respect to any act done or omitted to be done, any conclusion reached or report submitted that is done in good faith in respect of a Review.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Section 1. In order to facilitate communication between labor and management, a Labor Management Committee consisting of the Department Head and/or his designated alternate, the Assistant Chief of Police and two (2) Team Managers, and three (3) representatives of the Lincoln Police Union, along with at least one (1) Team Representative, will make up the Labor Management Committee. The Department Head will designate management personnel and the Union shall select Union representatives. Members will serve at the pleasure of the Department Head or Union President, depending upon who the member represents. Members will serve and be replaced on a staggered system (approximately three (3) year limit) depending upon the schedule agreed upon by the Department Head and the Union President. Section 2. Each Team area will be represented by a member of any rank to serve as spokesperson for that area. They will meet at least one week prior to the monthly Labor Management Committee meeting to formulate the common areas of interest and to elect a spokesperson to present the items in writing to the Labor Management Committee. Payment for attending this meeting will be at the discretion of the Department Head. Spokesperson will be chosen on a rotating basis. Team representatives will be picked by a vote of the Team members that they are representing. Section 3. The Labor Management Committee may discuss any area of the Department, with limitation only on those areas already under agreement between the City and the Union. The agenda will be based on the problem areas brought to the attention of the Committee by the Team Representatives and on any area representative members of Labor Management feel need to be discussed. Topics for discussion will be posted on the Union bulletin board and disseminated to Labor Management Committee members at least one (1) week prior to the monthly meeting. Section 4. Membership is subject to change through attrition and elected office, however, a one (1) week notice must be given to the Committee to afford the new member(s) voting privileges. Section 5. Realizing that communication is the key element to the smooth operation of any organization, the Labor Management Committee will xxxxxx an element of cooperation and unity of organizational members, be they labor or management. Section 6. Meetings shall be held at least once per calendar month. Additional meetings may be scheduled by mutual agreement of the Committee and the Department Head. Section 7. A quorum shall consist of two (2) members from labor and two (2) members from management.

  • JOINT LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The parties agree that they will continue the Joint Labor-Management Committee to discuss matters of mutual interest relating to the employees covered by this Agreement. Topics for the Joint Labor-Management Committee may include, but are not limited to, Professional Development, Incentive Pay, etc. The Committee shall meet quarterly or as mutually agreed by the co-chairs. The President of CWA or designee and the Director of Human Resources or designee shall serve as co-chairs.

  • Annual Reviews Within thirty (30) days after each annual anniversary of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Company shall review Employee’s performance of his duties pursuant to this Agreement and advise Employee of the results of that review; provided, however, that Company may elect to conduct a partial-year performance review in order to synchronize Employee’s annual review date with that of the Company’s other executives. In connection with each such review, the Company shall evaluate whether any increase in Employee’s compensation under Section 2, below, is appropriate.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!