Tenure Review. 20.6.1 The Tenure Review Committee shall convene after the conference of the 4th year fall evaluation, regardless of rating, and shall make its recommendation by January 31 using the standard District form.
20.6.2 To the greatest extent possible the evaluators who served on the 4th year fall evaluation shall comprise the Tenure Review Committee.
20.6.3 The Tenure Review Committee's recommendation will be based on evidence of the faculty member's performance as reflected in all evaluations completed from the first semester of full-time employment through week 14 of the fall semester of the 4th year. Satisfactory evaluations are the basis for recommendation for tenure. The Tenure Review Committee shall be provided access to all materials included in the evaluation file within this timeframe. Faculty members recommended for tenure will reflect a standard of excellence in their performance of faculty duties and their interaction with students and colleagues.
20.6.4 The granting of tenure is a legal right of the Governing Board. Xxxxxx is recommended by the superintendent/president as advised by the Chief Instructional Officer or chief student services officer in consultation with the Tenure Review Committee.
20.6.5 In the event a faculty member is not recommended for tenure within the provisions of Section 87610.1, California Education Code, the procedures of this section, subsections (a)
Tenure Review. All contract faculty members employed in a position designated by the District as “tenure track,” and governed by the provisions of California Education Code §87604 through §87609 shall be evaluated during the first years of their employment according to the policies, criteria, and procedures enumerated in this Article.
Tenure Review. Timeline
Tenure Review. A. Intent
1. These procedures are presented as the minimum of evaluation activity required and should not be considered as restricting other evaluation activity.
2. These procedures shall be carried out on a professional basis which serves the best long-term interests of the faculty, and the institution. Committees shall observe the principles of confidentiality in their discussions and deliberations.
Tenure Review. A. Intent - The master contract applies with the understanding that anyone who may want to come into SCCC to perform any type of review is subject to passing an NCIC background check.
B. Selection of the Tenure Review Committee - The master contract applies except to replace the Division Chair (position 1) with the faculty liaison, the student representative (position four) with a DOC employee as designated by the Superintendent of SCCC and where it has the Vice President of Instruction, this be changed to "Vice President of Instruction, or his/her designee."
C. The Tenure Review Committee's Report - The master contract applies.
D. The Tenure Review Procedures - The master contract applies with the understanding that for tenure purposes the three (3) calendar quarters worked in full-time status of each year shall be specifically identified to the individual and that reports submitted to the committee could come from the DOC staff.
Tenure Review. All unit members employed in a position designated by the District as “tenure track,” and governed by the provision of California Education Code §87604 through §87609 shall be evaluated during the first years of their employment according to the policies, criteria, and procedures enumerated in this Article. Tenure track faculty hired on or after the 2018-2019 academic year, will follow the 2018-2021 contract tenure review process. Tenure track faculty hired during the 2016-2017 or 2017-2018 academic year, will follow the respective contract tenure review process.
Tenure Review. (a) No later than eight (8) weeks after a Probationary Musician’s start date, an informal meeting shall take place with the Musician, the Orchestra Personnel Manager and the applicable principal for the purposes of performance review and feedback. In the case of a new principal who is a Probationary Musician, the meeting shall also include the remaining principals of that Instrument’s family who are Tenured Musicians.
(b) In the first full season of a Probationary Musician, the Tenure Review Committee shall meet on or before November 30, but not before November 1 to conduct a formal review. The Society shall give the applicable committee 28 days notice of the time and place of said meeting. This review will determine whether or not to offer the Probationary Musician a second full-season contract. Voting by secret ballot, the Committee may grant or deny offering a contract for a full second season by a simple majority. In the event of a tie vote, a second full-season contract will be granted subject to the approval of the Music Director.
(c) In the second full season of a Probationary Musician, a second formal review by the Tenure Review Committee shall take place on or before November 30, but not before November 1. The Society shall give the applicable committee 28 days notice of the time and place of said meeting. This review will determine whether the Probationary Musician will be granted the status of Tenured Musician. Voting by secret ballot, the Committee may grant or deny tenure by a simple majority. In the event of a tie vote, tenure will be granted subject to the approval of the Music Director.
(d) The Tenure Review Committee shall consist of the applicable Audition Committee subject to the restrictions set out in Article 12.04 (d) and the Music Director his/her duly appointed substitute, as proxy.
(e) The Music Director shall be the Chair of the Tenure Review Committee. In his/her absence, the Committee shall choose a Chair by majority vote.
(f) All Musicians serving as members of the Tenure Review Committee shall be compensated according to Article 13.04(i).
(g) The Society shall have the responsibility for the organization of the Tenure Review Committee and its functions, and shall report all meetings and results to the Association.
(h) A Musician must have been granted a positive decision from the Tenure Review Committee before being offered a contract for his/her third consecutive complete season as defined in Article 13.01.
(i) Except for the...
Tenure Review. 20.6.1 The Tenure Review Committee shall convene after the conference of the 4th year fall evaluation, regardless of rating, and shall make its recommendation by January 31 using the standard district form.
20.6.2 To the greatest extent possible the evaluators who served on the 4th year fall evaluation shall comprise the Tenure Review Committee.
20.6.3 The Tenure Review Committee's recommendation will be based on evidence of the faculty member's performance as reflected in all evaluations completed from the first semester of full-time employment through week 14 of the fall semester of the 4th year. Satisfactory evaluations are the basis for recommendation for tenure. The Tenure Review Committee shall be provided access to all materials included in the evaluation file within this timeframe. Faculty members recommended for tenure will reflect a standard of excellence in their performance of faculty duties and their interaction with students and colleagues.
20.6.4 The granting of tenure is a legal right of the Governing Board. Tenure is recommended by the superintendent/president as advised by the Chief Instructional Officer or chief student services officer in consultation with the Tenure Review Committee.
Tenure Review. The parties hereto agree that tenure review shall take place by the end of the Faculty Member's sixth year of full-time teaching service at the University. If a Faculty Member receives an unqualified appointment to his seventh year of full-time teaching service (i.e., he does not receive a termination notice), he shall be considered tenured.
Tenure Review. As with all other evaluations scheduled for Spring 2021, evaluation ratings will be based solely on subject matter content.
a. The tenure review process for faculty members in years 2, 3, and 4 will proceed according to the provisions of Article 30.
b. Faculty members in Year 1 of tenure review will have formal evaluations in Spring 2021, which will be included in the 2021-2022 tenure report.
c. Regular and adjunct faculty evaluations. Regular and adjunct faculty members who are due to be evaluated in Spring may choose among the following options:
i. Proceed with the evaluation as usual ii. A supportive observation iii. A self-evaluation
