Price/Cost. For Cost Plus Fixed Fee Orders, the Offeror’s proposal shall include a detailed cost proposal addressing all elements of cost and the applicable fixed fee of all resources required to accomplish the requirement as set forth in the RFP. For Firm Fixed Price Orders, only the firm fixed price needs to be submitted, unless otherwise specified in the RFP.
Price/Cost a. In general terms, the price of a device is relational to the expectations on supportability, life span or life cycle, and manageability.
Price/Cost. The evaluation factors, in descending order of importance, are: 1) Technical, 2) Past Performance and 3) Price/Cost. Technical subfactors are listed above in descending order of importance. Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are significantly more important than Price/Cost.
Price/Cost. The maximum amount payable by the State for performance of this Award Letter is $ and the maximum amount of Matching funds, if applicable, is $ . The total amount of Homeland Security and Emergency Management activities is $ .
Price/Cost. A. In consideration of Contractor’s services as described in this Contract, Contractor shall be paid from available encumbered funds as set forth in the Payment and Delivery Schedule, an amount not to exceed nine million, three hundred thirty thousand, two hundred twenty eight dollars and seventy cents ($9,330,228.70) for the term of the Contract. In no event shall the obligation of the State for the payment of consideration hereunder exceed the total sum of nine million, three hundred thirty thousand, two hundred twenty eight dollars and seventy cents ($9,330,228.70) unless amended in accordance with applicable state law. This Contract is subject to and contingent upon the continuing availability of funds for the purpose hereof.
Price/Cost. In Fiscal Year 2023, ASCSU shall pay the following amounts to RMSMC:
Price/Cost. Cost Reimbursement CLINs: Except for otherwise unacceptable proposals when awarding on initial proposals, the Government will perform a cost realism analysis to determine the most probable cost (MPC) for each applicable Offeror’s proposal. Cost realism analysis is the process of independently reviewing and evaluating specific elements of each Offeror’s proposed cost to determine whether the proposed cost is realistic for the work to be performed and are consistent with the unique methods of performance and materials described in the Offeror’s technical proposal. In conducting its cost realism evaluation, the Government may review the prospective Offeror’s proposed labor categories and compare the proposed rate to the average labor rate in industry or other similar rates within the same demographic zone where the work is to be performed. Pertinent cost information, including but not limited to DCAA- recommended rates for such costs as direct labor, overhead, G&A, etc., as necessary and appropriate, will be used to arrive at the Government determination of the MPC for the performance of this contract. The MPC is an Offeror’s total cost, including fee, and any additional adjustments the Government has determined necessary to make the proposed cost realistic for all periods. The Government will use the results of its cost realism analysis to determine the MPC of performance for each Offeror. The MPC may differ from the proposed cost. The higher of the MPC or proposed cost will be used for purposes of evaluation to determine the best value. Contract awarded value, however, will be based upon the successful Offeror’s proposed costs. Unrealistically low costs or inconsistencies between the technical and cost proposals may be assessed as proposal risk and could be considered weaknesses under the technical factor. Therefore, any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between the technical proposal and cost proposal should be explained in the narrative section of the cost/price proposal.
