PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW Sample Clauses

PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. 7.1. COMMISSION may evaluate the Communities: Place-Based – Community Capacity Building Initiative and the program and services conducted by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement on an ongoing basis throughout the Grant Period. Evaluations may include GRANTEE’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement, the effectiveness of GRANTEE’s program planning and the effectiveness of the program’s impact. GRANTEE shall participate in and cooperate with any such evaluation and, if applicable, activities related to an Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) for the Protection of Human Subjects. GRANTEE shall ensure the cooperation of its subcontractors, employees, volunteers, staff and board members in any such evaluation to the extent permitted or required by law. COMMISSION shall protect the confidentiality of proprietary information made available to COMMISSION by GRANTEE during such evaluations. COMMISSION may modify the programs and services outlined in Exhibit A based upon evaluation results. COMMISSION may use evaluation results in its decisions regarding possible future agreements with GRANTEE. 7.2. GRANTEE shall participate in and cooperate with statewide evaluations of California Proposition 10 (1998) (“Proposition 10”) efforts as requested by COMMISSION. GRANTEE shall be relieved of this participation obligation if GRANTEE provides COMMISSION with written notification that GRANTEE’s participation would violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) (Pub. L. 104-191), the HIPAA Administrative Simplification Regulations (45 C.F.R. Parts 160, 162, and 164) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (the “HITECH Act”), which was enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) (Pub. L. 111–5), federal, state or local laws, confidentiality agreements, or any GRANTEE policies related to the dissemination of confidential data. No release from the obligation to participate in statewide evaluations of Proposition 10 efforts shall release GRANTEE from its obligation to provide aggregate data or completed surveys about systems change and operations accomplished by GRANTEE, its lead agency or collaborative partners. 7.3. GRANTEE shall, at its own expense, participate in and cooperate with any financial or program audit activities required by COMMISSION, the County of Los Angeles (“County”) or the State of California (“State”) during the four (4) calendar yea...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. Borrower shall allow Commission authorized personnel to inspect and monitor its facilities and program operations as they relate to the Project or this Agreement, including the interview of Borrower's staff, Borrowers, and other program participants, as reasonably required by Commission during the Term.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. 7.1. COMMISSION may evaluate the «INITIATIVE_NAME» Initiative and the program and services conducted by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement on an ongoing basis throughout the Grant Period. Evaluations may include GRANTEE’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement, the effectiveness of GRANTEE’s program planning and the effectiveness of the program’s impact. GRANTEE shall participate in and cooperate with any such evaluation and, if applicable, activities related to an Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) for the Protection of Human Subjects. GRANTEE shall ensure the cooperation of its subcontractors, employees, volunteers, staff and board members in any such evaluation to the extent permitted or required by law. COMMISSION shall protect the confidentiality of proprietary information made available to COMMISSION by GRANTEE during such evaluations. COMMISSION may modify the programs and services outlined in Exhibit A based upon evaluation results. COMMISSION may use evaluation results in its decisions regarding possible future agreements with GRANTEE. 7.2. GRANTEE shall, at its own expense, participate in and cooperate with any financial or program audit activities required by COMMISSION, the County of Los Angeles (“County”) or the State of California (“State”) during the four (4) calendar years immediately following the expiration or termination of this Grant Agreement. GRANTEE shall maintain and keep confidential and secure, for a period of four
Sample 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. Contractor shall make available for inspection, financial and all other records pertaining to performance of this Contract to authorized City personnel, and allow said personnel to inspect and monitor its facilities and program operations, including the interview of Contractor staff and program participants as required by the City.
Sample 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. Trustor shall allow Beneficiary's authorized personnel to inspect and monitor its facilities and program operations as they relate to the Project or the Loan Agreement, including the interview of Trustor's staff, tenants, and other program participants, as reasonably required by Beneficiary during the term of the Loan.
Sample 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. Borrower shall allow COUNTY authorized personnel to inspect and monitor the Project and program operations as they relate to the Project or this Agreement, including the interview of Borrower's staff and users of the Project facilities, as reasonably required by COUNTY during the Term.
Sample 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. Borrower shall allow First 5 LA and its authorized representatives to inspect and monitor its facilities and program operations as they relate to the Project or this Agreement, including the interviewing of Borrower’s staff, tenants, and other program participants, as reasonably required by First 5 LA during the Term.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Monitoring and Review The Provider agrees to allow access to the Department for purposes of monitoring and review. This access includes but is not limited to client records, fiscal records, staffing records, policy and procedural manuals, facilities, staff, and children in care of the Department. The Department will conduct quality reviews, which may include site-based quality review visits.

  • Examination and Review (i) After receipt of the Closing Working Capital Statement, Seller will have *** (***) days from the date on which Buyer has provided to Seller all access and information reasonably requested for such purposes (the “Review Period”) to review the Closing Working Capital Statement. During the Review Period, Seller and its accountants will have full access to the relevant books and records of Buyer, the personnel of, and work papers prepared by, Buyer and/or Buyer’s accountants to the extent that they relate to the Closing Working Capital Statement and to such historical financial information (to the extent in Buyer’s possession) relating to the Closing Working Capital Statement as Seller may reasonably request for the purpose of reviewing the Closing Working Capital Statement and to prepare a Statement of Objections. (ii) On or prior to the last day of the Review Period, Seller may object to the Closing Working Capital Statement by delivering to Buyer a written statement setting forth Seller’s objections in reasonable detail, indicating each disputed item or amount and the basis for Seller’s disagreement therewith (the “Statement of Objections”). If Seller fails to deliver the Statement of Objections before the expiration of the Review Period, then the Closing Working Capital Statement and the Post-Closing Adjustment, as the case may be, reflected in the Closing Working Capital Statement will be deemed to have been accepted by Seller. If Seller delivers the Statement of Objections before the expiration of the Review Period, Buyer and Seller will negotiate in good faith to resolve such objections within *** (***) days after the delivery of the Statement of Objections (the “Resolution Period”), and, if the same are so resolved within the Resolution Period, then the Post-Closing Adjustment and the Closing Working Capital Statement with such changes as may have been previously agreed in writing by Buyer and Seller, will be final and binding.

  • Faculty Selection, Supervision, and Evaluation A. Faculty for a dual credit course will be approved and employed by Hill College. The instructor must meet credential requirements of Hill College and minimum requirements as specified by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). Each faculty member assigned to teach an academic course will have a master’s degree plus 18 hours in the specific discipline. Technical course instructors will have at least an associate degree and three years of work experience in the related business or industry. B. Instructors teaching dual credit courses must meet the same standards, review, and approval procedures as full- time, regular Hill College faculty. C. Faculty for a dual credit course who are not a full-time faculty member of Hill College report directly to the appropriate Xxxx of Instruction for the pathway in which the course(s) is being taught. The college shall supervise and evaluate part-time faculty teaching dual credit courses using the same or comparable procedures used for full-time faculty employed by college. D. The performance appraisal process for dual credit instructors will be conducted by the immediate supervisor and reviewed by the second line supervisor prior to the appraisal interview with the employee. The dual credit faculty evaluation process will mirror the evaluation process used at the college for all full-time faculty members and will be done according to the college policy manual. All dual credit faculty will be periodically evaluated using the following means: 1) random classroom observation by the immediate supervisor of that discipline, 2) student evaluations and 3) self-evaluation. E. All Dual Credit faculty instructors will be supervised by the following means: i. When dual credit classes are visited during a classroom observation, supervisors will ask to see items such as the textbook, observe instruction and interaction with students, and request a class syllabus and a sample of class tests, quizzes, labs, and/or projects. ii. Dual Credit instructors are given a self-evaluation form and are asked to fill it out and return the form to their Hill College supervisor. iii. All dual credit instructors are given a master syllabus for the course. The master syllabus provides grading policy and student learning outcomes. iv. All dual credit instructors are required to participate in the assessment process. v. All dual credit instructors are required to certify rosters. vi. All dual credit instructors are required to submit final grades. F. Faculty teaching courses, which result in the award of college credit, will be regularly employed faculty members of Hill College. All faculty selected by Hill College to teach dual credit classes will be considered employees of Hill College and will be compensated by the college in accordance with Hill College policy, procedures, and guidelines. G. Applications for employment and official transcripts from each college or university attended MUST be submitted and approved prior to the start of classes. All paperwork will be kept on file at Hill College.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!