Program Implementation and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Program Implementation and Evaluation. The purpose of this phase is to develop and implement a site-specific pretreatment program. In this phase, Stakeholders will determine specific Pollutants of Concern based on application of the Criteria for Pollutant of Concern to the actual Monitoring Data. The Enforcement Screening Criteria (as described above) and a data model will be utilized to determine the list of Significant Industrial Users. Pretreatment and other resources will be allocated according to the following Prioritization Strategy:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Program Implementation and Evaluation a. The Master Plan will describe the mechanisms through which the District will ensure that the program for EL students is fully implemented. These mechanisms will include: i. Regular verification and documentation by site administrators that they have taken the steps required by the relevant sections of the Master Plan; ii. The methods by which the District will ensure that classroom ELD and content instruction for EL students is consistent with the strategies and curriculum described in the Master Plan, that students’ progress in learning English and accessing the core curriculum is regularly monitored, and that students who are not making expected progress receive effective intervention services; iii. Monitoring to ensure that students with disabilities receive EL services until they meet District reclassification criteria; and iv. The staff who are responsible, by position title, for implementing all provisions of the Master Plan. These staff members may be noted in each specific section of the Master Plan. b. The Master Plan will include a description of how the District will evaluate the effectiveness of its EL program and analyze data to determine whether the program goals are being met or whether program modifications are necessary. The District will produce an annual written report, due on the same date each year, that addresses the following: i. Identifies the program goals (see Section II.A.2 above) and data that will be gathered to measure whether the District’s program goals are being met; ii. Specifies a timeline for collecting data and preparing an annual narrative report that analyzes the data; iii. Specifies the contents of the annual narrative report, including if necessary, the specific reasons that program goals are not being met and identifying whether the failure to meet a goal is due to a deficit in program design or a deficit in program implementation; iv. Specifies the actions that the District will take to correct any deficits found in program design or implementation; and v. Identifies the administrators and staff members who are responsible for each step in the evaluation process.
Sample 1
Program Implementation and Evaluation a. The Master Plan will describe the mechanisms through which the District will ensure that the program for EL students is fully implemented. These mechanisms will include: i. Verification by site administrators that they have taken the steps required by the relevant sections of the Master Plan; ii. The methods by which the District will ensure that classroom ELD and content instruction for EL students is consistent with the strategies and curriculum described in the Master Plan; and iii. Monitoring to ensure that students’ progress in learning English and accessing the core is regularly monitored and that students who are not making expected progress receive effective intervention services. b. The Master Plan will include a description of a comprehensive system for annually evaluating and monitoring implementation of the EL program. The evaluation will include: i. Analysis of data that addresses EL students’ English acquisition and academic achievement based on students’ grade levels, English proficiency levels, time in District program, and instructional setting. Data will be analyzed to determine the extent to which students are meeting the District’s goals for the EL program (see section III.A.2, above); and, ii. Provisions for using the data analysis to develop comprehensive plans for improving program implementation, providing necessary professional development, and modifying the District’s program as needed to improve EL student success.
Sample 1

Related to Program Implementation and Evaluation

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Implementation of Agreement Each Party must promptly execute all documents and do all such acts and things as is necessary or desirable to implement and give full effect to the provisions of this Agreement.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Implementation Report Within 150 days after the Effective Date, Halifax shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include: 1. the name, address, phone number, and position description of the Compliance Officer required by Section III.A.1, and a summary of other noncompliance job responsibilities the Compliance Officer may have; 2. the names and positions of the members of the Compliance Committee required by Section III.A.2; 3. the names of the Board members who are responsible for satisfying the Board of Commissioners compliance obligations described in Section III.A.3; 4. a copy of Halifax’s Code of Conduct required by Section III.B.1; 5. the number of individuals required to complete the Code of Conduct certification required by Section III.B.1, the percentage of individuals who have completed such certification, and an explanation of any exceptions (the documentation supporting this information shall be made available to OIG upon request); 6. a summary of all Policies and Procedures required by Section III.B (copies of the Policies and Procedures shall be made available to OIG upon request); 7. the following information regarding each type of training required by Section III.C: a. a description of such training, including a summary of the topics covered, the length of sessions, and a schedule of training sessions; b. the number of individuals required to be trained, percentage of individuals actually trained, and an explanation of any exceptions; and c. with respect to active medical staff members, the number and percentage who completed the training, the type of training and the date received, and a description of Halifax’s efforts to encourage medical staff members to complete the training. 8. a description of: (a) the Focus Arrangements Tracking System required by Section III.D.1.a; (b) the internal review and approval process required by Section III.D.1.e; and (c) the tracking and monitoring procedures and other Focus Arrangements Procedures required by Section III.D.1; 9. a description of the Disclosure Program required by Section III.F;

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!