Progression and Monitoring Sample Clauses

Progression and Monitoring. The supervisors will ensure that the student is aware of the requirements for progression including the procedures for supervision sessions, reviews of progress and the methods of assessment and in particular: the assessment for priesting or entry into the second year of the diaconate; and the final assessment at the end of training, both of which will be subject to assessment against an agreed national standard.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Progression and Monitoring. 5.1 The supervisor/s will ensure that the student is made aware of any inadequacy in his/ her progress or standards of work below that generally expected, confirming this in writing to the student and arranging any supportive action necessary. 5.2 It is the duty of the student to comply with good academic practice as outlined in University and School guidance and the duty of the supervisor to point out practices which are below the standard expected. See guidance at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx.xx/right-cite/ 5.3 An Annual Progress review is required for all research students in order to continue on the programme. The supervisor/s will ensure that the student is aware of the requirements for progression including, where appropriate, the procedure for confirming candidature. The supervisor/s and student will agree to participate and fulfil the requirements for progression. 5.4 The supervisor/s and student will agree any deadlines for submission of written work and the times involved for supervisor feedback. 5.5 The supervisor/s will outline the extent of assistance that will be given for students to prepare reports, presentations and the responsibility they will have to report annually on the student’s progress.
Progression and Monitoring. The supervisor/s will ensure that the student is made aware of any inadequacy in his/ her progress or standards of work below that generally expected, confirming this in writing to the student and arranging any supportive action necessary. It is the duty of the student to comply with good academic practice as outlined in University and School guidance and the duty of the supervisor to point out practices which are below the standard expected. See guidance at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx.xx/right-cite/ An Annual Progress Review is required for all research students (until submission of the thesis) in order to continue on the programme. The supervisor/s will ensure that the student is aware of the requirements for progression including, where appropriate, the procedure for confirming candidature. The supervisor/s and student will agree to participate and fulfil the requirements for progression. The supervisor/s and student will agree any deadlines for submission of written work and the times involved for supervisor feedback. The supervisor/s will outline the extent of assistance that will be given for students to prepare reports, presentations and the responsibility they will have to report annually on the student’s progress.
Progression and Monitoring. 8.1 The supervisors will ensure that the curate is aware of the requirements for progression, including the procedures for supervision sessions, reviews and reports, and methods of assessment, in particular: a) the report at priesting; and b) the final assessment at the end of training, which will relate to BKDR (and so to the agreed national learning outcomes). 8.2 Most deadlines for the completion of tasks and submission of work are according to the guidelines set out in the Curate Training Handbook. Where these are not recorded, it is the responsibility of the CTO to provide the necessary information. The CTO will be responsible for initiating the process of setting review meetings and sending reminders several weeks before reports are due in. 8.3 Unless otherwise stated, all reports and written work should be sent to the CTO who will forward them on to the Xxxxxx and others as required. 8.4 The CTO and TI will ensure that the curate is made aware of any inadequacy in his/her progress or standards of work below that generally expected, confirming this in writing and discussing any supportive action necessary. 8.5 Any circumstances which might require deadlines to be modified or for the duration of the curacy to be extended beyond the expected period, suspended or withdrawn should be fully discussed by all parties at the earliest opportunity.
Progression and Monitoring. 6.1 The supervisors will ensure that the student is aware of the requirements for progression including, the procedures for supervision sessions, reviews of progress and the methods of assessment and in particular: the assessment for priesting or entry into the second year of the diacaonate; and the interim and final assessment, both of which will be subject to assessment against an agreed national standard. 6.2 The learner and the supervisors will agree deadlines for the completion of tasks and submission of work. 6.3 The supervisors will outline the extent of assistance that will be given for the learner to prepare work and the responsibility the supervisors will have contribute to the reports on the student which go to the Xxxxxx. 6.4 The supervisors will ensure that the student is made aware of any inadequacy in his/her progress or standards of work below that generally expected, confirming this in writing to the student and arranging any supportive action necessary. 6.5 Any circumstances which might require the learning pathway to be modified or for the training to be extended, suspended or withdrawn should be brought to the attention of the supervisors.

Related to Progression and Monitoring

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Program Monitoring The Contractor will make all records and documents required under this Agreement as outlined here, in OEC Policies and NHECC Policies available to the SRO or its designee, the SR Fiscal Officer or their designee and the OEC. Scheduled monitoring visits will take place twice a year. The SRO and OEC reserve the right to make unannounced visits.

  • Contract Monitoring The criminal background checks required by this rule shall be national in scope, and must be conducted at least once every three (3) years. Contractor shall make the criminal background checks required by Paragraph IV.G.1 available for inspection and copying by DRS personnel upon request of DRS.

  • Monitoring In each case in which the Foreign Custody Manager maintains Foreign Assets with an Eligible Foreign Custodian selected by the Foreign Custody Manager, the Foreign Custody Manager shall establish a system to monitor (i) the appropriateness of maintaining the Foreign Assets with such Eligible Foreign Custodian and (ii) the contract governing the custody arrangements established by the Foreign Custody Manager with the Eligible Foreign Custodian. In the event the Foreign Custody Manager determines that the custody arrangements with an Eligible Foreign Custodian it has selected are no longer appropriate, the Foreign Custody Manager shall notify the Board in accordance with Section 3.2.5 hereunder.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!