Proposal Evaluation and Award Sample Clauses

Proposal Evaluation and Award. Award(s) shall be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the City, taking into consideration the evaluation factors set forth in the Request for Proposal. The City shall be the sole judge as to the acceptability of the products and/or services offered.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposal Evaluation and Award. The award shall be made in the best interest of the University. This Request for Proposal is not subject to any competitive bidding requirements of Minnesota law. The University reserves the right to accept other than the most financially advantageous proposal. The University reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals, to waive any informality in proposals, and unless otherwise specified in writing by the Offeror, to accept any items in any proposal. The University may require oral presentation of one or more Offerors for the purpose of discussion and negotiation. The award document will be a Contract incorporating, by reference, all the requirements, terms and conditions of the solicitation and the Contractor’s proposal as negotiated.
Sample 1
Proposal Evaluation and Award. 4.1 Evaluation Process Royse City ISD’s Evaluation Committee will initially review and evaluate each proposal received to determine the Vendor’s ability to meet the RFP requirements. The evaluation criteria described in Section 4.2 will be the basis for evaluation. Royse City ISD may request additional information or clarification of proposals and hereby reserves the right to select the particular response to this RFP that it believes will best serve its business and operational requirements, considering the evaluation criteria set forth below.
Sample 1
Proposal Evaluation and Award. (a) The Agencies will make their selection and award of a Contract for commercial real estate brokerage services pursuant to this RFP to a Respondent whose Proposal offers the best value for the Agencies and the State under Texas Government Code §§ 2155.074 and 2156.125. The Agencies are not required to select the lowest-priced proposal, but will take into consideration services which represent the best combination under the criteria listed in subparagraph (e).
Sample 1
Proposal Evaluation and Award. 3.1. TWC will use a formal evaluation process to select the successful Respondent. TWC will consider capabilities or advantages that are clearly described in the proposal, which may be confirmed by through technical discussions with qualified Respondents. TWC may determine that certain proposals receiving the highest or most satisfactory evaluations are within the competitive range for further consideration. Discussions may be carried out with Respondents that are within the competitive range, after which revised proposals may be requested. Discussions may be conducted for purposes of:
Sample 1
Proposal Evaluation and Award. 1. Proposals will be evaluated and the contract awarded in compliance with applicable statutes of the state of Massachusetts.
Sample 1

Related to Proposal Evaluation and Award

  • BID EVALUATION AND AWARD 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Job Evaluation Plan (a) The Employer agrees that no job evaluation plan pertaining to positions covered by this Agreement will be introduced without the mutual agreement of the Parties.

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.