We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Quantitative Data Sample Clauses

Quantitative DataThe partners from five European countries (Cyprus, Denmark, Italy, Romaniaand United Kingdom) have conducted an online research on the training needs for intercultural communication and patient safety of the target group. The results will inform the development of a European model for developing intercultural communication skills and capacity of working in multicultural/multidisciplinary teams and a training model using a MOOC (Massive Open On-line Course) (Project Application form, p.37) TABLE 1: Number of respondents from each country Number of the Participants, (%) Two hundred ten participants (n=210) were involved in the study from all partner countries. Table 1 shows the Country-by-Country distribution of the participants. The majority were from Denmark and Romania respectively.
Quantitative DataThe law of Louisiana provides that any physician, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner or psychologist may execute an emergency certificate, after examining a patient alleged to be mentally ill or suffering from a substance disorder (LA-R.S. 28:53, et seq). In order to issue the emergency certificate, the provider must determine that the patient is a danger to self or others or is considered gravely disabled (LA-R.S. 28:53, et. seq). The certificate lasts for a period of 72 hours and it is during this time that the patient is stabilized by the staff of the ED and an inpatient bed is located for the patient, if necessary, or the person is discharged to out- patient services or the patient is simply discharged to their home (LA-R.S. 28:53, et seq). The ED does not maintain a computerized database of patient records for this population of patients, but does maintain a paper record that includes the mandatory Form OBH1. The Form OBH1 is a two-part, carbonless copy document sold to hospitals by the Office of Behavioral Health for a cost of $6.55 per pack of 50 that states the reason for certifying the patient and is signed by the physician. The carbon copy is maintained in the file and the original returned to the Louisiana Office of Behavioral Health (OBH). The documents related to the admission of the patient via PEC are separately maintained in a paper file by RRMC and are not part of any other Electronic Health Record (EHR) maintained by the hospital on the patient. Consequently, much of what is known about PEC patients is anecdotal, thus it is difficult to evaluate patterns or trends. This is the first time that patient data has been collected and analyzed on this specific population using a computerized database. The quantitative data includes the collection of secondary data from 197 records of patients admitted to the RRMC ED via PEC (Physician Emergency Certificate) from March 2014 to October 2014. From those records, the following information was collected: • Unique Identifier Number (UIN) • Date of Birth (DOB), • Age, • Gender, • Race, • Street Address, • Parish, City, State, Zip Code, • Admission Date • Examination Date, • ED Physician, • Primary Care Physician (PCP), • Insurance, • Marital Status, • Street Address, • Reason for Visit, • Diagnosis, • PEC Reason, • Alcohol Use, • Drug use, • History of Mental Illness, • Suicidal, • Homicidal, • Violent, and • Mental Condition. Parameters for whether the patient was admitted to a long-term car...
Quantitative DataAfter conducting a retrospective cohort study of the records of patients, who presented to RRMC ED in mental and/or behavioral health crisis from March 2014 to October 2014, the data was analyzed and the following findings were made: The patient population was evenly divided between female (51%) and male (49%). Over 50% of the patients were single or divorced. The racial makeup of the target population was Black (39%) and White (61%). These numbers approximately reflect both the gender and racial 97, 49% 99, 51% Female Male Table 1: Target Population Breakdown by Gender make-up of Rapides Parish. The largest percentage of the target population was domiciled in Rapides Parish (73%) and Xxxxx Xxxxxx (10%), Louisiana. Patients primarily reside in the two largest cities in Rapides Parish, Alexandria (36%) and Pineville (21%). 80 71 43 29 10 5 8 5 3 7 2 3 Forty-eight (48%) percent of the population analyzed had private insurance. Surprisingly, only 28% of the patient population was uninsured. Sixteen (16%) percent of the patient population had Medicare and 5% had Medicaid. Three (3%) percent of the patient population had VA benefits. The median age of the patient population was 31. The oldest patient admitted was 75 and the youngest was 7. The mean age of the patient population at the time of admission to the ED was 23. One of the most significant findings of the study was that the majority of the patient population studied did not have a primary care physician. Sixty-four (64%) percent of the target population reported not having a primary care physician. 15, 8% Yes No Unknown Eighty-eight (88%) percent of the target population have a history of mental illness. A majority of the target population (81%) presented to the ED with some type of suicidal ideation. 90 82 80 72 70 60 50 40 Yes No 30 20 20 12 Female Male Seventy-eight (78%) percent of female patients and eighty-seven (87%) percent of male patients were suicidal. Eight-seven (87%) of black patients within the target were suicidal, compared to seventy-four (74%) of white patients within the target population. Of the target population, only fifteen (15%) percent were deemed homicidal at the time of admission to the ED. Twenty-three (23%) percent of the target population were determined to be violent at the time of admission. Over sixty (60%) of the entire target population admitted to or tested positive for drug use. Of those that admitted to using drugs at the time of admission or tested positive for dru...
Quantitative Data. All data that were generated from the financial, HRH records were checked daily to ensure its quality, correctness, completeness and consistency. This is important in order to ensure all needed information from financial and HRH records are recorded and documented effectively. Confidentiality of data was ensured that; only the researcher and research assistants had access to collected data.

Related to Quantitative Data

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Evaluation Software If the Software is an evaluation version or is provided to You for evaluation purposes, then, unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor, Your license to use the Software is limited solely for internal evaluation purposes in non-production use and in accordance with the terms of the evaluation offering under which You received the Software, and expires 90 days from installation (or such other period as may be indicated within the Software). Upon expiration of the evaluation period, You must discontinue use of the Software, return to an original state any actions performed by the Software, and delete the Software entirely from Your system and You may not download the Software again unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor. The Software may contain an automatic disabling mechanism that prevents its use after a certain period of time. RESTRICTIONS

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate. 4.2 Parties will notify each other with undue delay if they become aware of inaccuracies in shared Personal Data.

  • Performance Reporting The State of California is required to submit the following financial reports to FEMA:

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Historical Performance Information To the extent agreed upon by the parties, the Sub-Advisor will provide the Trust with historical performance information on similarly managed investment companies or for other accounts to be included in the Prospectus or for any other uses permitted by applicable law.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.