Reconciliation with Data Quality Objectives Sample Clauses

Reconciliation with Data Quality Objectives. Any data that do not meet DQO will not be used. If data quality issues arise, a determination will be made on whether the error was caused by equipment failure or operator error. If additional staff training, equipment repair, or minor revisions to the protocol or SOPs do not correct the problem, then the DQOs will be re-evaluated for feasibility of attainment. If they are determined to be unattainable, then they will be modified or the use of the parameter(s) in question will be evaluated. In some cases, a parameter may be eliminated if no reasonable/acceptable DQOs can be attained (Xxxx, 2004). If errors or discrepancies are noted during data validation between the field sheets and the database, the data on the field sheet will be taken as the correct values, and appropriate changes will be made to the database. If the field sheet is unreadable, then the value will be flagged in the database, and not used for reporting purposes. In reports and projects produced from this data, we will include a QA report that details any limitations of the data, including verification issues. Any such data will not be reported to the SWAMP database. Analysis of trends will be conducted graphically and through time series analysis. Graphical analysis will include the representation of concentration, flux, and load values as a function of time. These graphics will provide anecdotal indications of water quality trends including seasonal and annual fluctuations. Time series analysis for upward or downward trends in concentration, flux, and load will be conducted according to Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx (1995) or other suitable and accepted methods (Xxxxxx et al., 1991; and Xxxxxx, 1987). This will include nonparametric statistical methods including data transformation to account for lack of normal distribution in the data. The project needs sufficient numbers of data points, as represented by the completeness data quality objective in order to do trend analyses, define source area monitoring results, and determine the impact of restoration efforts on water-quality. A failure to achieve the numbers of samples cited in the Project documentation could mean a loss in the statistical power of inferences made from program data. CMS Client Matrix Spike COC Chain of Custody CWA Clean Water Act DFG Department of Fish and Game DHS Department of Health Services DQO Data Quality Objective DWR Department of Water Resources ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program EMAP Environmental Moni...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reconciliation with Data Quality Objectives. The data generated from the above analyses will be used to develop the TMDL for mercury for the Xxxxxxxxx River Watershed. A comparison of the requested data and final field and laboratory results will be made to show that all desired information was obtained, unless specific problems occurred that were previously documented by the QA Officer following each sampling event.
Sample 1

Related to Reconciliation with Data Quality Objectives

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Safety Objectives 55.1 The Parties recognise the potentially hazardous nature of the construction industry. To this end, the Parties to the Agreement are committed to continuous improvement in occupational health and safety standards through the implementation of an organisational framework which involves all Parties in protecting Employees’ health and safety. 55.2 In meeting these objectives, the Parties have agreed to consider a broad agenda through the consultative processes established by this Agreement. Such an agenda will include: (a) Measures designed to include the safe operation of plant and equipment; (b) Training issues including specific hazards, health and safety systems, and site induction; (c) Management of occupational health and safety through a comprehensive approach which aims to control hazards at their source, reduce the incidence and costs of occupational injuries and illnesses; and (d) Risk of fatigue (see clause 36.5). 55.3 The Employer will comply with all relevant work health and safety legislation, including the OHS Act, workers compensation legislation, regulations, codes of practice and relevant and appropriate Australian and Industry Standards as set out in Appendix F.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate. 4.2 Parties will notify each other with undue delay if they become aware of inaccuracies in shared Personal Data.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Capital Projects Constructability Manual. Identify and document Project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of Project goals, objectives.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Performance of Services in Accordance with Regulatory Requirements; Furnishing of Books and Records In performing the services set forth in this Agreement, the Manager: A. shall conform with the 1940 Act and all rules and regulations thereunder, with all other applicable federal, state and foreign laws and regulations, with any applicable procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, and with the provisions of the Trust’s Registration Statement filed on Form N-1A as supplemented or amended from time to time; B. will make available to the Trust, promptly upon request, any of the Fund’s books and records as are maintained under this Agreement, and will furnish to regulatory authorities having the requisite authority any such books and records and any information or reports in connection with the Manager’s services under this Agreement that may be requested in order to ascertain whether the operations of the Trust are being conducted in a manner consistent with applicable laws and regulations.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!