Review and Revision Sample Clauses

Review and Revision. A. This Spending Policy will be reviewed and reconfirmed or revised on a regular basis by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review and Revision. Plan for a mid-term evaluation (typically at the 5-year mark for a 10-year Plan). Note that if an AEWA International Species Action Plan exists there are reporting requirements under the Agreement on progress made with respect to their implementation (i.e. the Report on the Implementation of AEWA Species Action Plans which is submitted to the AEWA MOP every six years, the triennial AEWA National Reports as well as the National Reports submitted under the Plan of Action for Africa). If, in addition, the implementation of such an International Plan is being coordinated by an AEWA International Species Working Group, reporting requirements on annual basis or to every meeting of the Working Group may also exist. In this case, it will be pertinent to schedule implementation stock-taking exercises of national Species Action Plans so that this information can feed into these wider international evaluations. As the Action Plan nears the end of its 10-year term a more extensive evaluation report should be produced against the indicators set out therein. This may lead to a decision to revise, extend or retire the National Species Action Plan. The decision-making flowchart below in Box 6 has been devised and adopted by the AEWA Technical Committee to visualise the thought process when it comes to deciding whether International Species Action Plans adopted under the AEWA should be recommended for revision, extension or retirement at the end of their tenures. This flow-chart can also support such discussions on national level. Species Action Plans which have served their purpose (i.e. their objectives have been achieved and the species in question has been returned to a favourable conservation status) should be formally retired.
Review and Revision. This agreement will remain in effect unless notice of intent to terminate is provided to the other party in writing at least thirty days prior to the intended termination date. All requests for revisions to the contract must be made in writing and submitted to the other party for review. No revisions, amendments or modifications of this Agreement, or any part thereof shall be valid unless made in writing and agreed upon by both parties, as evidenced by their respective signatures.
Review and Revision. This SOP will be reviewed annually and updated as necessary to comply with changes in laws, company policies, or union agreements
Review and Revision. 13.1 This Code of Conduct will undergo periodic review and revision to ensure its ongoing relevance and effectiveness. Recruitment Representatives will be informed of updates and provided with appropriate training. At SETU/the University, we uphold the highest standards in international education and student support, aligning with the regulations governing international student care in Ireland.
Review and Revision. 6.01 The County shall be entitled to an administrative review conducted pursuant to the procedures stated in this subsection that are in effect for this Contract if both of the following occur: • The Department and the County disagree about the interpretation of any provision of this Contract; and • The disagreement concerns one of the following: o Reconciliation of claims and reimbursements; review is through departmental conference; o Any audit of the County as described in this Contract; review is through the audit resolution policy; o Any audit resolution process; review is through the audit resolution policy; or o Any federal audit of the County or the Department; review is through the Divisions Numbered Memos on federal audits. 6.02 If the Department and the County disagree about the interpretation of any provision of this Contract other than the disagreements described in section 6.01 of this Contract, and the County believes it is or will be injured by an action of the Department, the County shall be entitled to a hearing before the Department of AdministrationDivision of Hearings and Appeals, which must be requested within sixty (60) calendar days from the day the action in question occurred. The following procedures shall apply: • The Department shall cooperate with the Department of Administration – Division of Hearings and Appeals to have a hearing scheduled within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the appeal request; • Both the County and the Department shall be entitled to one thirty (30) calendar-day continuance of the hearing upon written notification to the other party and to the Division of Hearings and Appeals; • The hearing shall be conducted as if it were a Class 3 case hearing under Wis. Stat. ch. 227. At the hearing, the parties may present evidence, call and cross-examine witnesses, and make arguments on the issues; and • Either party may ask the Secretary of the Department to review the proposed decision within thirty
Review and Revision. A. Any exceptions to the procedures stated in this document require mutual agreement among the Academic Senate, Federation, and Administration. B. Resolution of a unique situation not covered by the procedures will require joint agreement among the Academic Senate, Federation and Administration. C. Review and revision will be done at the request of the Academic Senate, Federation, or Administration. D. Revisions must be mutually agreed upon by all parties, until such agreement is reached, the current procedures will remain in effect. X. If any committee member feels that the process has been compromised, they should report the concern to either the Vice President of Human Resources or the Director of Title IX, Diversity, and Inclusion. F. The President of the Academic Senate, the President of the Federation and/or the District, in consultation with the Vice President of Human Resources may temporarily suspend the hiring process. Immediately upon suspension of the process a joint committee of the Academic Senate, the Federation and the Administration will be formed to review any allegations and make a recommendation to the Vice President of Human Resources. The Vice President of Human Resources, with the recommendation of the committee, will make the final determination regarding the continuation, revision or termination of the process. Justification for terminating or altering the process will be given to the screening committee.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review and Revision. A. Any exceptions to the procedures stated in this document require mutual agreement among the Academic Senate, the Federation, and the Aadministration. B. Resolution of a unique situation not covered by the procedures will require joint agreement among the Academic Senate, the Federation and the Aadministration. C. Review and revision will be done at the request of the Academic Senate, the Federation, or the Aadministration AS, the Federation or the administration. D. Revisions must be mutually agreed upon by all parties, until such agreement is reached, the current procedures will remain in effect. X. If any committee member feels that the process has been compromised, he/she they should report the concern to either the Vice President of Human Resources or the Director of Title IX, Staff and Student Diversity, and Inclusion. F. The President of the Academic Senate, the President of the Federation and/or the District, in consultation with the Vice President of Human Resources Superintendent/President, may temporarily suspend the hiring process. Immediately upon suspension of the process a joint committee of the Academic Senate, the Federation and the Aadministration will be formed to review any allegations and make a recommendation to the Vice President of Human Resources Superintendent/President. The Vice Superintendent/President of Human Resources, with the recommendation of the committee, will make the final determination regarding the continuation, revision or termination of the process. Justification for terminating or altering the process will be given to the screening committee. Credentialed high school instructors selected by their high school to teach dual enrollment courses offered for credit at El Camino College will have their teaching qualifications evaluated by an El Camino College screening committee (Appendix M-2, Section II). Qualifications will be considered by reviewing the items under Appendix M-2, Section V, C. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Vice President of Human Resources El Camino Community College District For the Federation: For the District: Xxxxxx Xxxx, President El Camino College Federation of Teachers Date Date NOTE: The Superintendent/President is responsible for the implementation of the hiring procedures as jointly agreed upon by the Academic Senate and the Board of Trustees in accordance with the Education Code, Section 87360.
Review and Revision. OCR will review the materials submitted by the District above and notify the District if the District has not met the criteria outlined in Section I. In this case, OCR will provide feedback and guidance to the District to assist the District in satisfactorily completing the tasks.
Review and Revision. The Tees Forest is a long-term project and the Forest Partnership is committed to maintaining and demonstrating its long-term support. This Memorandum is therefore open ended but will be reviewed and updated: • In conjunction with periodic reviews of the Forest Plan • If there is a material change in the circumstances of one or more of the Forest Partners • If it would significantly assist the implementation of the Forest Plan
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!