REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Sample Clauses

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. A. Listening
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. The author reviews pertinent literature in this chapter, including reviews of earlier studies and theoretical analysis.
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. The idea of supplier relationship management is to give priority to suppliers. Managing relationship with suppliers are mutually beneficial to both the firm and its suppliers. Monitoring supplier performance is a tool that systematically works with suppliers on improving the supplier's quality and performance 2010).
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. In this chapter, the researcher elaborated about some theories connected to the thesis.
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. A. Reading Comprehension 10 1. The Definition of Reading 10
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. Writing skills is one of the most vital parts of English language learning, especially at the elementary level. According to Aplus Blog (2020), " Learning how to write is not just about developing writing skills. It is also a way of train ing the mind to think." Writers need to build and e xp ress ideas with clear sentences and coherent paragraphs. The key to expressing ideas is proper grammar. Following the correct grammar rules makes a writing piece clearer and more readable. In grammar, one of the essential structure rules to learn is the subject and verb agreement. People who speak or write without committing subject-verb agreement errors are considered to have a good command of the English language. However, English as a second language learners tends to ma ke errors in terms of these grammatical rules. According to Xxxxx, (2009), students tend to make errors in the general rule of subject - verb agreement. Many students struggle with subject-verb rules in their writing even though they have been learning English for many years. Subject-verb agreement errors are observable when writing an essay or any written production. Xxxxx et al. (1982) stated that errors are the flawed side of learner speech and writing. According to (Xxxxxx 1967, as cited in Xxxxx 2009), an error refers to a systematic deviation made by learners who have not yet mastered the rules of L2. A learner cannot self-correct an error because it is a product reflective of his or her current stage of L2 development or underlying competence. To perform a language task such as writing, learners should master the grammatical structure needed. The teachers can regularly give activities that will improve students' knowledge of the subject-verb agreement. Teachers must be responsive to this matter to improve the quality of students' language acquisition and must use and follow correctly the 14 Rules of Subject - Verb Agreement. According to xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, here are the 14 Rules of Subject-Ve rb Agreement: Rule No.1: Subject and verb must agree in number, Rule No. 2: Subject and verb must agree with each other even if there are subordinate and prepositional phrases that come between, Rule No. 3: Subjects must be placed after the verb if sentences start with "there" or "here," Rule No.4:Subjects come after the verb in questions, Rule No. 5: Plural form of the verb is applied in the sentence when two subjects are joined by "and," Rule No. 6: Singular verb form is applied in sentences w...
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. To support the understanding of the problem formulated in chapter 1, some theories are reviewed related to the concepts of writing skill and journal writing. This chapter also presented some relevant research studies for this research. Once those theories have been reviewed and some relevant research studies have presented, conceptual framework is draw for this study.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. A. The Concept of Willingness to Communicate Initially, the theoretical concept of WTC was established in the discursive domain of native language (L1) usage. Xxxxxxx (1976) was the first to develop the concept of unwillingness to communicate, which was described as the propensity to avoid verbal communication. XxXxxxxxx and Xxxx later known the unwillingness to communicate (1985) who proposed WTC as a means of communicating in the current situation. In their theoretical concept, they identified WTC as a personality characteristic that refers to a consistent proclivity to speak in diverse contexts. Based on WTC's personality characteristic hypothesis, XxxXxxxxx et al (1998) introduced the idea of WTC in the field of L2 WTC through the heuristic model consisting of different variables that might impact L2 WTC, also known as the pyramid model This concept suggests that WTC is produced by factors other than personality traits like as self-confidence and communication skill, Introvert and extrovert personalities, among others, are impacted by situational circumstances. It is because people's WTC varies according on their circumstances (XxXxxxxxx & Richmond, 1982). Willingness to communicate in a second language (L2 WTC) concept indicates to the student's readiness to communicate in a second language when allowed to do as such and has been progressively shown to associate with students' language fluency and capability just as their speaking abilities (Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx, and Xxxxxxx, 2008). It's anything but amazing then that the idea has gotten impressive consideration in second language research lately. XxxXxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx and Xxxxx (1998) pyramid model has been the most powerful structure that has roused investigation into L2 WTC over most recent twenty years. The model presents the impact of trait-like and state-like variables on L2 WTC. While the statelike factors, including self-confidence and desire to speak with a particular individual/group at a particular time, apply a prompt effect on L2 WTC, the trait-like variables, like social situation, intergroup climate and personality, exert an indirect, intergroup attitudes, interpersonal motivation and intergroup motivation, distal influence on L2 WTC. One of the affective factors to impact the accomplishment in second and foreign language learning is willingness to communicate (WTC). Riasati (2012) states that it is fundamental in a language classroom with communication approach to have students who are...

Related to REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

  • Review of Records Business Associate agrees to make internal practices, books, and records relating to the use and Disclosure of PHI received from, or created or received by Business Associate on behalf of Covered Entity available to Covered Entity, or at the request of Covered Entity to the Secretary, in a time and manner designated by Covered Entity or the Secretary, for purposes of the Secretary determining Covered Entity’s compliance with the HIPAA Regulations. Business Associate agrees to make copies of its HIPAA training records and HIPAA business associate agreements with agents and subcontractors available to Covered Entity at the request of Covered Entity.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Review of Personnel Files Every member shall be allowed to review any of his/her personnel files except "confidential law enforcement records" and "trial preparation records" as defined in Ohio Revised Code Section 149.43 at any time, upon request and reasonable notice. Such request shall be made to the supervisor directly responsible for maintenance of such files. Review of the files shall be made in the presence of such supervisor or the supervisor's designated representative. For the Division master personnel file, the request shall be made to the member's Subdivision Deputy Chief or his/her designated representative. Any member, or the member's Lodge representative, may copy documents in the member's file. The City may levy a charge for such copying, which charge shall bear a reasonable relationship to actual costs. A member will be notified in writing any time records within his/her personnel, background, IAB, and/or payroll file(s) are requested, as a public records request pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 149.43, provided the City determines that the request is proper under applicable law. A member may request copies of any records provided under this paragraph, and these copies shall be provided at no cost to the member.

  • Handling of Written Complaints In addition to other remedies contained in the Contract, a person contracting with DIR may direct their written complaints to the following office: Public Information Office Department of Information Resources Attn: Public Information Officer 000 X. 00xx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Austin, Texas 78701 (000) 000-0000, facsimile

  • How to File an Appeal of a Prescription Drug Denial For denials of a prescription drug claim based on our determination that the service was not medically necessary or appropriate, or that the service was experimental or investigational, you may request an appeal without first submitting a request for reconsideration. You or your physician may file a written or verbal prescription drug appeal with our pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The prescription drug appeal must be submitted to us within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the initial determination letter. You will receive written notification of our determination within thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of your appeal. How to File an Expedited Appeal Your appeal may require immediate action if a delay in treatment could seriously jeopardize your health or your ability to regain maximum function, or would cause you severe pain. To request an expedited appeal of a denial related to services that have not yet been rendered (a preauthorization review) or for on-going services (a concurrent review), you or your healthcare provider should call: • our Grievance and Appeals Unit; or • our pharmacy benefits manager for a prescription drug appeal. Please see Section 9 for contact information. You will be notified of our decision no later than seventy-two (72) hours after our receipt of the request. You may not request an expedited review of covered healthcare services already received.

  • Review of Personnel File Upon written authority from an employee, OC shall permit the President of the Union or their designate to review that employee's personnel file in the office in which the file is normally kept in order to facilitate the proper investigation of a grievance.

  • Substance Abuse Treatment Information Substance abuse treatment information shall be maintained in compliance with 42 C.F.R. Part 2 if the Party or subcontractor(s) are Part 2 covered programs, or if substance abuse treatment information is received from a Part 2 covered program by the Party or subcontractor(s).

  • Submitting Loop Makeup Service Inquiries 2.9.2.1 C.M. may obtain LMU information by submitting a mechanized LMU query or a Manual LMUSI. Mechanized LMUs should be submitted through BellSouth's OSS interfaces. After obtaining the Loop information from the mechanized LMU process, if C.M. needs further Loop information in order to determine Loop service capability, C.M. may initiate a separate Manual Service Inquiry for a separate nonrecurring charge as set forth in Exhibit A of this Attachment.

  • LEAD WARNING STATEMENT Housing built before 1978 may contain lead-based paint. Lead from paint, paint chips, and dust can pose health hazards if not managed properly. Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant women. Before renting pre-1978 housing, lessors must disclose the presence of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in the dwelling. Student must also receive a federally approved pamphlet on lead poisoning prevention. That pamphlet is available at xxxx://xxx0.xxx.xxx/lead/protect-your-family-lead-your-home-1

  • Personnel File (a) An employee, or the President of the Union (or the President's designate) with the written authority of the employee, shall be entitled to review an employee's personnel file, in the office in which the file is normally kept. The employee or the President, as the case may be, shall give the Employer adequate notice prior to having access to such files.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.