Reviewing Faculty Members Performance Sample Clauses

Reviewing Faculty Members Performance a) Each tenured or tenure-track Faculty Member shall be reviewed by the Xxxx for each of Research, Teaching, and Service and each teaching Faculty Member shall be reviewed by the Xxxx for each of Teaching, Service, and Other. Limited term Faculty Members shall be reviewed based on Research, Teaching, Service, and/or Other, as applicable. Performance is assessed as unsatisfactory, satisfactory, very good or outstanding. The definitions for these performance assessments are as follows: i. An unsatisfactory assessment is for work that does not meet performance expectations ii. A satisfactory assessment is for high quality work that meets performance expectations iii. A very good rating is for high quality work that exceeds performance expectations
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reviewing Faculty Members Performance a) Each Faculty Member will be reviewed by the Xxxx for each of Research, Teaching, and Service. Performance is assessed as unsatisfactory, satisfactory, very good or outstanding. The definitions for these performance assessments are as follows: i. An unsatisfactory assessment is for work that does not meet performance expectations ii. A satisfactory assessment is for high quality work that meets performance expectations iii. A very good rating is for high quality work that exceeds performance expectations
Sample 1Sample 2
Reviewing Faculty Members Performance a) Each Faculty Member will be reviewed by her/his Xxxx for each of Research, Teaching and Service. Performance is assessed as unsatisfactory, satisfactory, very good or outstanding. The definitions for these performance assessments are as follows: i. An unsatisfactory assessment is for work that does not meet performance expectations ii. A satisfactory assessment is for high quality work that meets performance expectations iii. A very good rating is for high quality work that exceeds performance expectations iv. An outstanding rating is for very high quality work that significantly exceeds performance expectations. b) For Faculty Members appointed jointly in two (2) Faculties, the Deans of these Faculties shall consult and prepare an integrated review for each area of professional responsibility. c) The Xxxx(s) shall communicate to each Faculty Member a written statement articulating the performance assessment in each area of the Faculty Member’s professional responsibilities (Research, Teaching and Service). The Faculty Member has the right to meet with the Xxxx within five (5) Days of receiving this document to present grounds for revising the assigned performance assessment. The Xxxx shall carefully consider these reasons and indicate any proposed revisions within five (5) Days. d) The Xxxx shall provide a copy of the Faculty Member’s written performance assessment as described in 17.03 d) to the Xxxxxxx no later than June 15th for inclusion in the Faculty Member’s Official File. e) The Faculty Member has the right to add a letter of response or rebuttal to the Xxxx’x assessment, and this letter shall be attached to the Xxxx’x written statement as described in 17.03 d) in the Official File.
Sample 1

Related to Reviewing Faculty Members Performance

  • Reviewing Contract Performance The Contractor shall work with the Authority to establish and maintain an effective and beneficial working relationship to ensure the Contract is delivered to at least the minimum required standard as specified in the Schedule (The Services).

  • Performance while Dispute is Pending Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.

  • Performance and Salary Review Company will periodically review Executive’s performance on no less than an annual basis. Adjustments to salary or other compensation, if any, will be made by Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that Xxxxx has materially breached this IA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Annual Performance Bonus During the Employment Term, the Executive shall be entitled to participate in the STIP, with such opportunities as may be determined by the Chief Executive Officer in his sole discretion (“Target Bonuses”), and as may be increased (but not decreased, except for across-the-board reductions generally applicable to the Company’s senior executives) from time to time, and the Executive shall be entitled to receive full payment of any award under the STIP, determined pursuant to the STIP (a “Bonus Award”).

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Interviewing Opportunity A representative of the Union or Xxxxxxx shall be given an opportunity to interview each new Employee within regular working hours, without loss of pay, for a maximum of thirty (30) minutes during the first month of employment for the purpose of acquainting the new Employee with the benefits and duties of Union membership and its responsibilities and obligations to the Employer and the Union.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!