Revocation of Registration Sample Clauses

Revocation of Registration. The registration of the Guarantor as an insurer shall be revoked, suspended or otherwise have restrictions or conditions placed upon it unless, in the case of the placing of any such restrictions or conditions, such restrictions or conditions could not have a material adverse effect on the interests of the Finance Parties under the Finance Documents.

Revocation of Registration. Subject to the first paragraph, the registration of a registered education savings plan that is deemed to have been registered by the Minister for the purposes of this Part, in accordance with the definition of "registered education savings plan" in section 890.15, is deemed, for the purposes of this Part, to be revoked as of the day on which, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, chapter 1, 5th Supplement), the registration of the plan is revoked under subsection 13 of section 146.1 of that Act. History: 1975, c. 21, s. 19; 1975, c. 83, s. 84; 1999, c. 83, s. 273; 2000, c. 5, s. 201; 2010, c. 31, s. 175. History: 1975, c. 21, s. 19; 2000, c. 5, s. 202. TAX History: 1975, c. 21, s. 19. History: 1975, c. 21, s. 19; 2017, c. 1, s. 254. INCOME INCLUSIONS History: 1975, c. 21, s. 19; 2000, c. 5, s. 204.

Revocation of Registration. ‌ The SO may be subject to revocation of its registration and termination of Coordination Services if it is found to be in noncompliance as provided for in Subsection 5.7 and Section 7.

Revocation of Registration. In the event the Inspector fails to comply or perform any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement, the Department may revoke the Inspector’s registration.

Revocation of Registration. 899. Where, in accordance with section 898.2, the Minister sends a notice of revocation of the registration of a registered education savings plan to the promoter of the plan, the registration of the plan is revoked as of the day specified in the notice of revocation, unless the Court of Québec or a judge thereof, on application made at any time before the determination of a contestation under subparagraph e of the first paragraph of section 93.1.15 of the Tax Administration Act (chapter A-6.002), decides otherwise.

Revocation of Registration. On January 31,1921, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office <of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued an Order to Show Cause to Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, M.D. [Respondent], 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00000, proposing to revoke DEA Certificate of Registration, XX0000000, issued to him at 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX „ Apt. 000.xx, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000, and to deny any pending application for renewal of such registration as a practitioner under 21 U.S.C. 823(f). The proposed action w as predicated on Respondent’s lack of authorisation to p ractice medicine in the District o f Columbia and that his continued registration w as inconsistent with the public interest, as set forth in 21 U.SJC. 823(f)- Respondent, acting pro se, submitted a written request fo r a hearing on the issues raised by the Order to Show Cause, and the m atter was docketed before Administrative Law Judge Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. In accordance with Judge Xxxxxxx’x ruling, prehearing statements were submitted by both parties. Respondent also filed a motion for summary disposition alleging that he had no prior convictions relating to controlled substances, and that he maintained licenses to practice medicine in other jurisdictions. O n March 15,1991, Judge Xxxxxxx denied Respondent’s modem. On May 20,1991, Government counsel filed a motion for summary disposition, based on Respondent's lack of state authorization to practice medicine in die District c f Columbia. The administrative law judge then provided Respondent an opportunity to respond to die motion for summary disposition. Respondent did not file such a response. Judge Xxxxxxx considered die motion for summary disposition, and on June 12,1991, issued her opinion and recommended ruling in this matter. No hearing w as held, since no factual issues were involved. Neither side filed exceptions to the recommended ruling of the administrative law judge. On July 17, 1991, Judge Xxxxxxx transmitted the record to the Administrator. The Administrator h as considered this record in its entirety and, pursuant to 21 CFR 1318.67, hereby issues his final order in this matter, based on the following findings o f fact and conclusions of law. The administrative law judge found that, by order dated September 7„ 1989, the Department o f Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Board o f Medicine for the District of Columbia, revoked Respondent’s license to practice medicine. Therefore, Respondent is without authority to practice ...

Revocation of Registration. In the event the Inspection Station fails to comply or perform any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement, the Department may revoke the Inspection Station registration.

Revocation of Registration. On October 19, 1995, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an Order to Show Cause to Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xx., M.D., (Respondent), of Nicholasville, Kentucky, notifying him of an opportunity to show cause as to why DEA should not revoke his DEA Certificate of Registration, XX0000000, under 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), and deny any pending applications for registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), because the Commonwealth of Kentucky, State Board of Medical Licensure, had revoked his Kentucky medical license by Order dated November 17, 1994. By letter dated November 15, 1995, the Respondent waived a hearing in this matter and submitted a copy of a letter dated October 16, 1995, which he had previously filed with the American Board of Family Practice. Therefore, the Deputy Administrator, after considering the investigative file and the letters submitted by the Respondent, enters his final order in this matter without a hearing pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.54(e) and 1301.57. The Deputy Administrator finds that the Respondent was issued DEA Certificate of Registration XX0000000 for his practice in Nicholasville, Kentucky, and that this registration is due to expire on February 28, 1997. However, DEA received a copy of a Final Order of Revocation from the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (Medical Board) dated November 17, 1994, revoking the Respondent’s medical license. The final order accepted and incorporated a Hearing Officer’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law reached after a hearing was held on August 23, 1994. Also, by order dated January 3, 1995, the Jefferson Circuit Court, Division Eight, Commonwealth of Kentucky, dismissed the Respondent’s appeal of the Medical Board’s action, finding that Xxxxxxx, X.X., 57 FR 49,195 (1992); Xxxxx X. Xx, M.D., 54 FR 30,618 (1989); Xxxxx Xxxxx, M.D., 53 FR 11,919 (1988). Here, it is clear that the Respondent is not currently authorized to practice medicine in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. From this fact, the Deputy Administrator infers that, since the Respondent is not authorized to practice medicine, he also is not authorized to handle controlled substances. Therefore, because the Respondent lacks state authority to handle controlled substances, he currently is not entitled to a DEA registration. Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in him by 21 U.S.C. 823 and 824, and 28 CFR...

Revocation of Registration. In the event that the Registered Contractor (i) fails to pay any electrical permit fees when due, (ii) becomes bankrupt or insolvent, or (iii) breaches any other term or condition of this Agreement, the Registered Contractor shall at the option of Manitoba Hydro be immediately suspended from maintaining status as a Registered Contractor, and if the Registered Contractor fails to remedy same to the satisfaction of Manitoba Hydro within ten (10) days of the receipt of written notice from Manitoba Hydro, Manitoba Hydro may, in addition to any other rights or remedies available at law, immediately and without prior or any notice to the Registered Contractor, revoke the Registered Contractor's status under the RECP, notify any affected customers of such revocation and terminate this Agreement. In the event of such revocation of status, no registration refund whatsoever will be provided to the Registered Contractor.

Revocation of Registration. On October 19, 1995, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement