Salary Placement Review Board Sample Clauses

Salary Placement Review Board. The purpose of the review process is to solely determine and resolve any errors that were made in the initial placement of a Residential Faculty member. A Residential Faculty member may within the first twelve (12) months of employment as a Residential Faculty member, appeal his/her vertical and/or horizontal placement to the Faculty Association President; after this time period, no requests will be considered. If the Residential Faculty member’s appeal occurs within the first twelve (12) months of their employment, the Faculty Association President will convene a review committee to review his/her initial salary placement as prescribed by the District Human Resources Division Guidelines. The review committee will consist of four (4) members from the Faculty with the Faculty Association President, or designee, serving as chair. The Chair will appoint two (2) members: one (1) member will be appointed from the Faculty Professional Growth Committee and one (1) member from the appropriate Instructional Council. The fourth member will be the respective Faculty Senate President or designee. The committee will; (1) review the case documents submitted by the concerned Faculty member; (2) meet with the Chief Human Resources Officer, or designee, to discuss the case; and (3) make written recommendations to the CHRO, or designee. The CHRO, or designee, upon receiving the written recommendation, will communicate, in writing, his/her decision within fifteen (15) business days.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Salary Placement Review Board. The purpose of the review process is to solely determine and resolve any errors that were made in the initial placement of a Full-Time Faculty member. A Residential Faculty member may within the first twelve (12) months of employment as a Residential Faculty member, appeal their vertical and/or horizontal placement to the Faculty Association President; after this time period, no requests will be considered. If the appeal occurs within the first twelve (12) months of their employment, the Faculty Association President will convene a review committee to review the appellant’s initial salary placement as prescribed by the District Human Resources Division Guidelines. An OYO or OSO Faculty member may, within the term of their initial employment as an OYO or OSO Faculty member, appeal their vertical and/or horizontal placement to the Faculty Association President; after this time period, no requests will be considered. If the appeal occurs within the initial term of their employment, the Faculty Association President will convene a review committee to review the appellant’s initial salary placement as prescribed by the District Human Resources Division Guidelines. The review committee will consist of four (4) members from the Faculty with the Faculty Association President, or designee, serving as chair. The Chair will appoint two (2) members: one (1) member will be appointed from the Faculty Professional Growth Committee and one (1) member from the appropriate Instructional Council. The fourth member will be the respective Faculty Senate President or designee. The committee will; (1) review the case documents submitted by the concerned faculty member; (2) meet with the Chief Human Resources Officer, or designee, to discuss the case; and (3) make written recommendations to the CHRO, or designee. The CHRO, or designee, upon receiving the written recommendation, will communicate, in writing, their decision within fifteen (15) business days.
Sample 1
Salary Placement Review Board. Some activities may require prior approval from the Faculty Professional Growth Committee. The Faculty Professional Growth Committee will at all times attempt to make determinations in an open and unbiased manner that is free from conflict of interest. Accordingly, Faculty Chairs who are members of the Faculty Professional Growth Committee will abstain from decisions that affect the professional growth applications of Residential Faculty members in their respective Departments/Divisions; likewise, Residential Faculty members who are on the Professional Growth Committee will abstain from decisions that affect the professional growth applications of their respective Faculty Chairs. Other potential conflicts of interest will be treated in a similar manner. 13.2 Policy for Horizontal Advancement on the Salary Schedule
Sample 1

Related to Salary Placement Review Board

  • Training Plan 19.6.1 An apprentice shall be a party to an individual Training Plan. 19.6.2 The Training Plan sets out the training that the apprentice will do both on – the – job and off – the – job. The Training Plan also sets out how the Registered Training Organisation (RTO) will ensure the apprentice will receive quality training – both on – the – job and off – the – job. 19.6.3 The Training Plan reflects the choices made by the employer and the apprentice in relation to:-

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Annual Plan On or before November 1 of each calendar year during the Term, Manager shall prepare and submit to Owner for its approval a proposed annual plan for the promotion, operation, leasing, repair and maintenance of the Project for each calendar year (the "Proposed Annual Plan"). For purposes of this Agreement, a "Fiscal Year" shall mean a calendar year beginning on the first day of January and ending on the last day of December. The Annual Plan for the remaining portion of Fiscal Year 2003 is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Marketing Plan The MCOP shall submit an annual marketing plan to ODM including all planned activities for promoting membership in or increasing awareness of the MCOP. The marketing plan submission shall include an attestation by the MCOP that the plan is accurate and is not intended to mislead, confuse, or defraud the eligible individuals or ODM.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!