Seed Funding Sample Clauses

Seed Funding. [Define how the seed money to establish the Congress is being provided. In particular define the amount of money (if any) IRPA is contributing to the seed funding]
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Seed Funding. Shorelight will bear the start-up costs and fund the operations of the IAP through its Tiger subsidiary. Shorelight will provide Seed Funding until such time as Tiger will have achieved sufficient internal cash flow to fund its own operations and at any time the IAP requires additional working capital.
Sample 1
Seed Funding. Seed funding is in principle available from ATPRI&NI: approx. 3 k€. Local National support organisations 20 k€. The Helsinki Congress (2010): approx. 10 k€. It is assumed that IRPA does not provide seed funding.
Sample 1
Seed Funding. Seed funding is in principle available from The Hague Congress (2018): approx. 20 k€. It is assumed that IRPA does not provide seed funding.
Sample 1
Seed Funding. In FY22, XXXXX continued the disbursement of seed funding to selected JAPRI WEE participants. XXXXX designed the seed funding activity as a competition, where JAPRI beneficiaries who have participated in JAPRI trainings could submit business proposals and plans to gain access to funding. There was no significant change in the seed funding selection process. During the application round, JAPRI participants could submit their business proposal in order to be considered. XXXXX worked closely with its trainers, coaches, and ODBT partners to ensure that their respective participants were well aware of the chance to obtain seed funding. In FY22, XXXXX opened several additional application rounds for JAPRI’s beneficiaries in Blitar, Bangkalan, Xxxxxxx, and Kediri, as JAPRI WEE was able to increase the number of seed funding recipients due to other program cost savings. For Trenggalek, JAPRI decided to select business proposals from the shortlisted applicants from the previous application period. XXXXX took this approach because Trenggalek already had numerous eligible seed funding recipients who had been shortlisted during the previous seed funding round but had not made the final cut only due to the limited availability of spots at that time. Initially, JAPRI WEE targeted 90 ODBT participants in Xxxxxxx and Kediri for seeding funding this quarter. However, with the aforementioned cost-savings, JAPRI was able to increase the number of seed funding recipients by 150, bringing the total to 240 recipients. A total of 354 proposal submissions were received, from which 240 participants were selected to receive IDR 1,400,000 (USD 100) after going through the assessment process. During the application period, all JAPRI participants who had completed an ET or ODBT as well as business mentoring/coaching could submit a business proposal. Once the application period closed, JAPRI’s team reviewed all submitted proposals to ensure that the applicants had included a completed business proposal form, attached BMC, participated in JAPRI’s ET/ODBT and coaching/mentoring, and a personal bank account. The first criteria (‘completed business proposal form’) was an additional criterion for this quarter. The proposal must show authenticity and not be copied from other sources. This is to further motivate the participants to be more creative in developing business proposals and to lessen the risk of plagiarism. Table 3: Summary of Seed Funding Disbursement Location # of successful appl...
Sample 1
Seed Funding. Seed funding is in principle available from The Foundation: approx. 3 k€. The Dutch Society for Radiation Protection (NVS): max. 25 k€, with the obligation to minimize this amount whenever possible. The Helsinki Congress (2010): approx. 10 k€. Seed funding from the Dutch Society for Radiation Protection (NVS) and the Helsinki Congress will only be accepted by the Foundation, if pre-financing the congress through the Pre-financing and Guarantee Fund (xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xx/en) turns out to be impossible or impracticable. It is assumed that IRPA does not provide seed funding.
Sample 1
Seed Funding. IRPA will provide seed funding of US$30,000 to assist in covering initial financial out goings of the 2012 Congress.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Seed Funding. Seed funding is in principle available from The Society: approx. $20,000 AOARP: approx. $5,000 Melbourne Convention Bureau: $4,500 It is assumed that IRPA does not provide seed funding.
Sample 1

Related to Seed Funding

  • Additional Funding If the General Partner determines that it is in the best interests of the Partnership to provide for additional Partnership funds (“Additional Funds”) for any Partnership purpose, the General Partner may (i) cause the Partnership to obtain such funds from outside borrowings, or (ii) elect to have the General Partner or any of its Affiliates provide such Additional Funds to the Partnership through loans or otherwise.

  • Formula Funding Funding equivalent to the level of funding which would be provided through the funding formula of the LA to a maintained school which had all of that Academy's relevant characteristics, including its number of pupils;

  • Supplemental Funding Unless otherwise defined by program rules, Supplemental Funding is the award of additional funds to provide for an increase in costs due to unforeseen circumstances. The State will comply with all Federal program agency policies and procedures for requesting supplemental grant funding. The State will comply with the following guidelines when requesting supplemental funding for the Medical Assistance Program and associated administrative payments (CFDA 93.778): The State must submit a revised Medicaid Program Budget Report (CMS-37) to request supplemental funding. The CMS guidelines and instructions for completing the CMS-37 are provided in Section 2600F of the State Medicaid Manual (SMM). The CMS/CO must receive the revised Form CMS-37 through the Medicaid Budget Expenditure System/Children's Budget Expenditure System (MBES/CBES) no later than 10 calendar days before the end of the quarter for which the supplemental grant award is being requested. Additional guidance on this policy is available from the respective CMS Regional Office, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The State will comply with the following guidelines when requesting supplemental funding for TANF (CFDA 93.558), CCDF (CFDA 93.575), CSE (93.563), and the FC/AA (CFDA 93.658 and CFDA 93.659) programs administered by the U.S. Department of Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (HHS/ACF):

  • Per-pupil Funding The School's non-facility general fund per-pupil funding shall be as defined in Sec. 302D-28, HRS. The Commission shall distribute the School's per-pupil allocation each fiscal year pursuant to Sec. 302D-28(f), HRS, and shall provide the School with the calculations used to determine the per-pupil amount each year. All funds distributed to the School from the Commission shall be used solely for the School's educational purposes as appropriated by the Legislature, and the School shall have discretion to determine how such funding shall be allocated at the school level to serve those purposes subject to applicable laws and this Contract.

  • Program Funding Upon entry into force of this Compact, MCC will grant to the Government, under the terms of this Compact, an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eight Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand United States Dollars (US$408,850,000) to support the Program (“Program Funding”). The allocation of Program Funding is generally described in Annex II to this Compact.

  • Fiscal Funding Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, the parties hereto agree that the charges hereunder are payable to the Contractor by the District solely from appropriations received by District. In the event such appropriations are determined by the Chief Financial Officer/Comptroller of the District to no longer exist or to be insufficient with respect to the charges payable hereunder, this Agreement shall immediately terminate without further obligation to the District upon notice that such appropriations no longer exist and are insufficient. If this Agreement is so terminated, then the District shall only pay Contractor for goods and/or services provided by Contractor and accepted by the District up to, through, and including the date of termination. Following the termination of this Agreement under this Section, the parties’ duties to one another shall cease except for those obligations that shall survive the termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the District’s payment obligations for goods and/or services accepted by the District before the date of termination, and the Contractor’s duties to insure and/or indemnify the District and to cooperate with any audit. Termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section shall not limit either of the parties’ remedies for any breach of this Agreement.

  • Funding This Contract is subject to termination or cancellation, without penalty to System Agency, either in whole or in part, subject to the availability of state funds. System Agency is a state agency whose authority and appropriations are subject to actions of the Texas Legislature. If System Agency becomes subject to a legislative change, revocation of statutory authority, or lack of appropriated funds that would render either System Agency’s or Grantee’s delivery or performance under the Contract impossible or unnecessary, the Contract will be terminated or cancelled and be deemed null and void. In the event of a termination or cancellation under this Section, System Agency will not be liable to Grantee for any damages, that are caused or associated with such termination, or cancellation, and System Agency will not be required to give prior notice.

  • Lack of Funding The Parties recognize that the compensation provided for in this Grant Contract depends on budget approval and appropriations of sufficient grant funds by the Lancaster County Board of County Commissioners (“Grant Funds”). The Parties further recognize that the Sponsor may terminate this Grant Contract in whole or in part immediately upon written notice to Grantee if grant funds do not receive sufficient budget approval or appropriations. The date Project Monitor sends the written notice of termination shall be the date of termination. The Grantee understands and agrees that the Sponsor shall not provide for funding under this Grant Contract from the Lancaster County General Fund, tax revenue, or any other source, and that the sole source of funding for this Grant Contract shall be approved and appropriated Grant Funds. In the event that Grant Funds do not receive sufficient budget approval or appropriations, the Grantee shall be compensated pursuant to the terms of this Grant Contract for authorized Project Account costs charged against the Project Account prior to the date of termination according to the approved Project Budget. Xxxxxxx agrees that Xxxxxxx has no reasonable expectation of payment for unauthorized costs, or for payment of any kind from any other source. The Grantee further understands and agrees that any costs not covered by the current Grant Contract are not authorized.

  • Other Funding It may be appropriate for funding to be provided to the awardee by other organizations, including Federal agencies in support of their missions or in support of mission-related staff research. It is also recognized that it may be appropriate for personnel or facilities to be used for other NSF and non-NSF projects that are deemed consistent with the scope of the federal award. Such activities, however, must be coordinated in advance with NSF and not impact negatively on NSF sponsored activities to be performed under the award. Accordingly:

  • Loss of Funding Performance by University under this Agreement may be dependent upon the appropriation and allotment of funds by the Texas State Legislature (Legislature) and/or allocation of funds by the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System (Board). If Legislature fails to appropriate or allot necessary funds, or Board fails to allocate necessary funds, then University will issue written notice to Contractor and University may terminate this Agreement without further duty or obligation. Contractor acknowledges that appropriation, allotment, and allocation of funds are beyond University’s control.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!