Source Selection Process Sample Clauses

Source Selection Process. The Government’s target is five IDIQ contracts for this MATOC; however, if the Contracting Officer determines during the source selection process that fewer or more than that number of contracts should be awarded, the Contracting Officer has the discretion of adjusting that number or awarding none at all. The Government may not award any contract if the resulting contract would not represent a "best value" to the Government using trade-off selection procedures as required by the Federal Acquisition Regulations and guidance. The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) will select the sources whose proposal represents the best value to the Government. The PCO’s decision will be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all evaluation factors in the solicitation. While the PCO may use reports and analysis prepared by others, the source selection decision will represent the PCO’s independent judgment. The source selection decision will be documented, including the rationale for any business judgments and trade-offs made or relied on by the PCO, including benefits associated with additional costs. The award of the base contracts for this MATOC will be based on a Best Value Trade-off evaluation. Award may not be to the offerors who provides the lowest price, but to the offerors who provide the best value to the Government considering the non-price technical evaluation factors and price. Future task orders will be competed among all members of the MATOC pool in accordance with procedures in FAR 16.505. Future awards under this MATOC will be based on the assessment of proposals submitted for the task orders. The Contractor will not be reimbursed for the cost of task order proposal preparation. Task orders will be awarded based on either a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) evaluation or a Best Value Trade-off evaluation. For LPTA task orders, award will be made to the offeror submitting the lowest evaluated price proposal that meets or exceeds the acceptability standards for the non-price factors. For Best Value Trade-off task orders, award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is determined to be most advantageous to the Government based upon assessment of the specific task order evaluation factors. Based upon the results of the integrated assessment of the proposals for Best Value Trade-off task orders, the Government may make an award to other than the lowest-priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror if doing so wo...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Source Selection Process. The award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting the requirement set forth within this solicitation. Thus, the best value determination will be in accordance with (IAW) FAR 15.101-2, lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) source selection process.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Source Selection Process

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Single Source Selection Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements of paragraph 3.10 of the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection, may, with the Association's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • ONLINE PUBLIC AUCTION PROCESS 2.1. E-Bidders may browse through the PAH Website and select the properties they wish to bid online.

  • TRANSACTION PROCESS The RFQ for this Lot will contain a deliverable-based Statement of Work (SOW). The RFQ will include, but is not limited to: Authorized User timeframes; system integration requirements; and other risks that may affect the cost to the Authorized User. All responses to RFQs must include detailed price information, including but not limited to: hours required per title, cost per hour etc. Travel, lodging and per diem costs must be itemized in the total quote and may not exceed the rates in the NYS OSC Travel Policy. More information can be found at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/agencies/travel/travel.htm. All costs must be itemized and included in the Contractor’s quote.

  • Panel Selection 1. The Parties shall apply the following procedures in selecting a Panel: (a) the Panel shall comprise 3 members; (b) within 15 days following the date of the establishment of the Panel, each Party shall nominate a Panelist; (c) the Parties shall endeavor

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Annual Production Program document describing the forecasts for Production and handling of Oil, Gas, water, special fluids, and waste arising from the Production process of each Development Area or Field.

  • Provider Selection To the extent applicable to Provider in performance of the Agreement, Provider shall comply with 42 CFR 438.214, as may be amended from time to time, which includes, but is not limited to the selection and retention of providers, credentialing and recredentialing requirements and nondiscrimination. If Subcontractor and/or Health Plan delegate credentialing to Provider, Subcontractor and/or Health Plan will provide monitoring and oversight and Provider shall ensure that all licensed medical professionals are credentialed in accordance with Health Plan’s and the State Contract’s credentialing requirements.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.