SOURCE SELECTION DECISION Clause Samples

SOURCE SELECTION DECISION. This source selection will be conducted in accordance with the FAR, DFARS, NMCARS, internal NAVSEA guidance and procedures as well as any other applicable regulation or policy. These regulations and procedures provide for checks and balance and independent evaluation of proposals to ensure integrity is maintained throughout the process. Offerors are encouraged to consult the regulations and guidance online. The following is a broad overview of the process:
View SourceView Similar (2)
SOURCE SELECTION DECISION. The Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will make the source selection decision based on the proposal that represents the best value to the Government. The Source Selection authority / Contracting Officer will not receive a recommendation from any individual or body as to which offeror should receive the award and additionally will not receive a rank order or order of merit list pertaining to the offers being evaluated. The Source Selection Authority will use the Tradeoff Process approach for proposal evaluation and basis of contract award. The Source Selection Authority will evaluate quality proposals using adjective ratings and cost or price. All evaluation factors, when combined, other than cost or price are slightly more important than price. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. Factor 1 Design Technical and Schedule More Important than Factor 2 Element 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Design Analysis and Construction Approach More Important than Element 2 Element 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Proposed Project Summary Schedule Less Important than Element 1 Factor 2 Price and Pro Forma Information Less Important than Factor 1 Factor/ Element Location Description Relative Importance N/A Vol. 2 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Bid Schedules) Not Rated N/A Vol. 2 TAB B Bid Guarantee Evidence of Bondability Not Rated N/A Vol. 2 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated
View SourceView Similar (2)
SOURCE SELECTION DECISION. The overall evaluation methodology set forth above will be used by the Contracting Officer as a guide in determining which quotations offer the best value to the U.S. Government. In accordance with FAR 52.215- 1, and as set forth in Section M of this solicitation, award will be made by the Contracting Officer to the responsible Offeror(s) whose quotations represents the best value to the U.S. Government after evaluation in accordance with all factors in this solicitation.
View Source
SOURCE SELECTION DECISION. The Government will make a source selection decision based on the Tradeoff process method in accordance with FAR 15.101-1. The Government intends to award a contract to the responsible offeror(s) whose proposal demonstrates the best value by exhibiting the greatest overall technical merit and performance confidence assessment at a reasonable price. Best value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement (FAR 2.101). Accordingly, the Government may be willing to pay a reasonable premium for a contract offering superior overall technical merit and past performance. Conversely, the Government may select a lower-price, lower-rated proposal if the Government determines that the premium associated with the higher-rated proposal is not justified. In making its best value determination the Government shall consider technical merit (i.e., all non-price factors taken together) to be significantly more important than the total evaluated price. However, the importance of total evaluated price as an evaluation factor will increase with the degree of equality in overall technical merit of competing proposals.
View Source
SOURCE SELECTION DECISION. The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract using the procedures of FAR Part 15. The Government shall select the Offeror whose offer represents the best value to the Government, considering technical, past performance and price when compared to other proposals. The Government also reserves the right to not award a contract if a contract award is not in the best interest of the Government.
View Source

Related to SOURCE SELECTION DECISION

  • Single Source Selection Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements of paragraph 3.10 of the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection, may, with the Association's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Site Selection 5.1.1 If the parties have not designated the street address of the Franchised Location on Exhibit A on the Effective Date, Franchisee shall identify, submit and obtain Franchisor’s prior written approval of the Franchised Location meeting the requirements of this Agreement prior to entering a lease or sublease for the Franchised Location. Franchisee shall provide Franchisor all information required by Franchisor, as determined by Franchisor in Franchisor’s sole determination, necessary for Franchisor to evaluate the Franchised Location. Franchisor shall have ten (10) business days to review Franchisee’s written site proposal for the Franchised Location and notify Franchisee of its approval or disapproval in writing. Franchisor’s failure to respond within ten (10) business days shall signify Franchisor’s disapproval of the site. Franchisor shall not unreasonably withhold Franchisor’s approval of a proposed site for the Franchised Location. 5.1.2 Franchisee must have a site for the Franchised Location approved by Franchisor, receive the opening notice from Franchisor described in Section 5.4 below, and open Franchisee’s Franchised Business for business within six (6) months from the Effective Date, except as otherwise provided in Section 5.1.3 All matters related in any way to Franchisee’s site are Franchisee’s sole responsibility, regardless of any assistance Franchisor may choose to provide. Franchisee is responsible for obtaining any architectural and engineering services required for Franchisee’s facility and for ensuring its compliance with local law. Neither Franchisor, nor any other person or company associated with Franchisor shall have any liability for any site‐related matter. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees not to make any claims against Franchisor and/or any of Franchisor’s affiliates or associates with regard to such matters. 5.1.4 If Franchisor makes a loan to Franchisee for (i) Franchisee’s purchase of the franchise for the Franchised Business; (ii) the remodeling of the Franchised Location; (iii) the transfer of any interest in this franchise or this Agreement; or (iv) any other purpose; Franchisee shall open (or re‐open, as the case may be), the Franchised Business for business within sixty (60) days from the loan origination date.

  • Panel Selection 1. The Parties shall apply the following procedures in selecting a Panel: (a) the Panel shall comprise 3 members; (b) within 15 days following the date of the establishment of the Panel, each Party shall nominate a Panelist; (c) the Parties shall endeavor 2. If a Panelist appointed under this Article resigns or becomes unable to act, a successor Panelist shall be appointed within 30 days in accordance with the selection procedure as prescribed for the appointment of the original Panelist and the successor shall have all the powers and duties of the original Panelist. The work of the Panel shall be suspended during the appointment of the successor Panelist.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;