Structural Analysis. The H2O and CO2 density profiles along the direction perpendicular to the pore surface in C-S-H pores show oscillations, which are typical of fluids in nano-confinement (Figure 3). For C/S = 0.83, the density profiles for both 1-nm and 2-nm pores (Figures 3a and 3d) show that CO2 molecules lie within the first hydration layer of the surface; coexisting with water molecules. The density peak on the left of the surface is attributed to the H2O/CO2 molecules trapped within the channels formed by the silicate chains running along the [010] crystallographic direction. In contrast, for higher C/S ratios (1.5 and 1.75), the CO2 molecules are located far off from the surface with H2O molecules forming a definite hydration layer adjacent to the C-S-H surface. As the pore size increases from 1 to 2 nm, bulk-like density profile for the water molecules is attained above approximately 7 Å from the surface, which is typical of other slit-like mineral nanopores (e.g., Xxxxxxxxxxx et al., 2015). However, there is a noticeable depletion of CO2 concentration near the C-S-H surface, especially at higher C/S ratios, since the surface is becoming relatively more hydrophilic. This observation is consistent with recent simulations results for competitive adsorption of H2O/CO2 mixtures into similar smectite clay interlayers, which also show some CO2 depletion at the surface with a more hydrophilic local environment (Xxxxxxxxxx et a., 2018b). Figure 3: Atomic density profiles of H2O and CO2 mixtures within the nanopores of C-S-H models. a) 1-nm pore at C/S=0.83; b) 1-nm pore at C/S=1.5; c) 1-nm pore at C/S=1.75;
Structural Analysis. Prior to making any changes to equipment on the Tower or Structure, Licensee shall cause a structural analysis to be performed and provide a copy of said analysis to County for its review and approval, which may be withheld in County’s reasonable discretion based on structural concerns. Licensee shall modify its plans for changes at the Site based on County review of said analysis.
Structural Analysis. 4.1) Assumptions
1. All tower legs, horizontals, and diagonals meet ASTM A572 grade 50, A53 grade 42, or A36 standards. Refer to the elevation drawing for more information.
2. All bolts meet ASTM A325 standards.
3. All members and components are in good condition, properly assembled, and free of defects that could adversely affect their capacities.
4. Any bolted or welded connection is adequate to develop the full capacity of the members joined and can transfer all the loads analyzed herein.
5. All bolted connections are adequately tightened.
6. All antenna mounts and other supporting mechanisms are capable of supporting the applied loads.
7. The tower base foundation is adequate to support the applied loads purely for purposes of modeling the tower in RISA Tower.
8. All coaxial cables are properly secured and supported along the face of the tower. Refer to E-7 & E-7.1 for information on coaxial cable locations.
Structural Analysis. A structural analysis utilizing current building code of the jurisdiction having authority, showing the roof and building can support all point and lateral loads, including but not limited to Licensee’s proposed equipment and Cabling, existing mechanical/HVAC equipment associated with the building, all telecommunication equipment installed by other carriers or parties including Licensor and loading of all roofing materials including legacy or previously installed and overlaid roofing layers and ballast. Licensee is responsible for obtaining all information to conduct a complete and accurate analysis. Licensor has full discretion to object to the final loading on any roof, building or any other structure.
Structural Analysis. The satellite shall have positive Margins of Safety (MoS) in ultimate and yield when Factors of Safety (FoS) defined in [***] A are applied to the maximum limit loads (i.e. acceptance loads) encountered during service, where the margin of safety is calculated as: MoS = (Material Allowable)/((Acceptance Load)*(FoS))-1 [***]
Structural Analysis. In connection with any Major Change Lessee shall upon the reasonable written request of Lessor conduct at Lessee's sole cost and expense a reasonable structural analyses and wind load analyses of the Tower which includes any existing loads and the load of Lessee's antennas, cabling and appurtenances. Lessor shall promptly provide Lessee with any structural analyses and wind load analyses, any foundation designs and structure designs in Lessor's possession which may have been previously prepared and furnished to Lessor with respect to the Tower; provided, however, that such analyses shall be furnished without any warranties whatsoever as to their accuracy or applicability to the analyses required of Lessee pursuant to this subparagraph 2(a).
Structural Analysis. Prior to installing any Equipment, Lessee shall complete a structural analysis study (the “Study”) of the Tower, at Xxxxxx’s sole cost and expense, to determine the feasibility of installing Lessee’s proposed Additional Equipment on the Tower, and will furnish to Lessor a copy of the completed Study. In the event the Study indicates that the Tower cannot structurally support Lessee’s Equipment at the agreed upon height, Lessee may elect to terminate this Amendment upon ten days prior written notice to Lessor. In the event Lessee elects to terminate this Amendment pursuant to this Paragraph 4, neither party hereto shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder except those that by their terms survive the termination of this Amendment.
Structural Analysis. Any expenses necessary to make the Structure or Infrastructure ready for Licensee’s construction of its improvements shall be the responsibility of Licensee. Licensee must obtain and submit to City a structural engineering analysis carried out by a qualified structural engineer showing the Structure, and its foundation, is able to support the proposed Wireless Installation.
Structural Analysis a. Tenant shall be solely responsible with ensuring that Tenant’s installation of the Equipment shall not adversely affect the structural integrity of the Tower, and that no structural damage results to the Tower due to installation of any Equipment or facilities of the Tenant.
b. Prior to the Tenant’s installation, Tenant shall provide a study, showing that Tenant’s installation shall not adversely affect the structural integrity of the Tower or showing what modifications or reinforcements, if any, are necessary to make the Tower structurally sound so as to accommodate Xxxxxx’s installation. Said study shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of the Owner and Owner shall have the right to require a study be completed by a Missouri Registered Structural Engineer, or to refuse installation by Xxxxxx if said study is not to the reasonable satisfaction of the Owner.
c. Tenant may terminate this Agreement if it determines based on actual and reasonable information that Tenant cannot use the Tower as a Communications Facility due to issues concerning the structural integrity of the Tower. Tenant may reinforce or otherwise make the Tower structurally sound for the Tenant’s use in accordance with a submitted bid, at Xxxxxx’s sole cost. Any structural reinforcement is solely the responsibility of Tenant and shall be subject to approval of Owner.
d. Owner shall notify Tenant in writing five (5) days prior to attaching, or permitting any other person or entity to attach, any Equipment, additional antennas, microwave dishes, or other similar equipment (“Additional Antennas”) to the Tower.
Structural Analysis. Lessee shall be solely responsible for any cost or expense for any and all maintenance and repairs required to ensure that Project Improvements comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. Lessee shall perform a structural analysis that complies with the latest version of TIA-222 at least every five (5) years if antennas have been added to tower, or as regulations mandate. Lessee shall cause a copy of that analysis to be delivered to the County for its benefit promptly upon preparation.
