Study Review Sample Clauses

Study Review. KFSH&RC-J shall conduct the Study at the KFSH&RC-J facilities with the prior approval and ongoing review of all appropriate and necessary review authorities and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. KFSH&RC-J shall provide SPONSOR with written evidence of review and approval of this Study by KFSH&RC-J Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) prior to the initiation of the Study and shall inform SPONSOR of the IRB’s continuing review promptly after such a review takes place, which shall be at least once per year.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Study Review. Principal Investigator shall conduct the Study at General with the prior approval and ongoing review, of all appropriate and necessary review authorities and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. and regulations. Principal Investigator shall provide Company with written evidence of review and approval of this Study by General's Institutional Review Board ("IRB") prior to the initiation of the Study and shall inform Company of the IRB's continuing review promptly after such review takes place, which shall be at least once per year. All volunteers shall meet the legal age requirements of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the state in which the Study is to be conducted.
Sample 1
Study Review. Research conducted by the Principal Investigator at General shall be with the prior approval and ongoing review of all appropriate and necessary review authorities and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Principal Investigator shall, when applicable, provide Palomar with written evidence of review and approval of Clinical Studies prior to initiation of the Clinical Studies and shall inform Palomar of the IRB’s continuing review promptly after such review takes place, which shall be at least once per year. All volunteers shall meet the legal age requirements of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the state in which the Research is to be conducted. In the performance of this Agreement, General agrees not to provide Palomar with any patient identifying information. Recognizing a common goal of securing the integrity of all individually identifiable health information, the parties agree to treat as confidential all individually identifiable health information in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations governing the confidentiality and privacy of individually identifiable health information, including, but without limitation, to the extent that each party is subject to it, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and any regulations and official guidance promulgated thereunder. Palomar further agrees, at all times, to regard and preserve as confidential such individually identifiable health information, and to refrain from publishing or disclosing any part of such individually identifiable health information or from using it, except as necessary to discuss and analyze the results of the study, to ensure research integrity, to communicate with the Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory authorities, and otherwise as required by law or as permitted by authorizations or consents signed by study subjects or waivers of authorization granted by an IRB overseeing the study or General’s affiliated Privacy Board (the “Permitted Activities”). Palomar also agrees to restrict the use and disclosure of any individually identifiable health information gained through the Permitted Activities to its workforce, contractors, subcontractors, study collaborators and agents (collectively “Recipients of Patient Information”) who must have access to that information in order directly to support or facilitate the Permitted Activities; and to notify the Rec...
Sample 1
Study Review. Both cities shall have the opportunity to participate in the Feasibility Study review and provide comments on all deliverables. The cities agree to conduct the reviews and provide comments in a timely manner to assist the consultant in completing the Feasibility Study on the timeline designated in the contract.
Sample 1
Study Review. DFPCC shall conduct the Study with the prior approval and ongoing review of all appropriate and necessary review authorities and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Principal Investigator shall provide Company with written evidence of review and approval of this Study by DFPCC's Institutional Review Board ("IRB") prior to the initiation of the Study and shall inform Company of the IRB's continuing review and approval of the Study promptly after such review takes place, which shall be at least once per year.
Sample 1
Study Review. The Study shall be conducted by staff members of Institution under the direction of the Principal Investigator at Institution or elsewhere with the prior approval and ongoing review of all appropriate and necessary review authorities and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The Study may also be subcontracted to other sites which have been approved by deCODE ("Approved Subcontractee"), provided that any such Approved Subcontractee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. Principal Investigator shall provide deCODE with written evidence of review and approval of this Study by Institution's Institutional Review Board ("IRB") prior to the initiation of the Study and shall inform deCODE of the IRB's continuing review promptly after such review takes place, which shall be at least once per year.
Sample 1
Study Review. The PI shall conduct the STUDY at the KFSH&RC facilities with the prior approval and ongoing review of all appropriate and necessary review authorities and in accordance with all applicable local laws and regulations. PI shall obtain approval of this STUDY from the KFSH&RC Research Ethics Committee (“REC”) prior to initiation of the STUDY. Written evidence of review and approval of the STUDY by the KFSH&RC REC shall be maintained by PI and be made available to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s Food and Drug Authority upon request. Continuing review by REC shall take place at least once per year, and documentation of continuing approval shall be maintained by PI.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Study Review

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Feasibility Study A feasibility study will identify the potential costs, service quality and other benefits which would result from contracting out the work in question. The cost analysis for the feasibility study shall not include the Employer’s indirect overhead costs for existing salaries or wages and benefits for administrative staff or for rent, equipment, utilities, and materials, except to the extent that such costs are attributable solely to performing the services to be contracted out. Upon completion of the feasibility study, the Employer agrees to furnish the Union with a copy if the feasibility study, the bid from the Apparent Successful Bidder and all pertinent information upon which the Employer based its decision to contract out the work including, but not limited to, the total cost savings the Employer anticipates. The Employer shall not go forward with contracting out the work in question if more than sixty percent (60%) of any projected savings resulting from the contracting out are attributable to lower employee wage and benefit costs.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Clinical 1.1 Provides comprehensive evidence based nursing care and individual case management to a specific group of patients/clients including assessment, intervention and evaluation. 1.2 Undertakes clinical shifts at the direction of senior staff and the Nursing Director including participation on the on-call/after-hours/weekend roster if required. 1.3 Responsible and accountable for patient safety and quality of care through planning, coordinating, performing, facilitating, and evaluating the delivery of patient care relating to a particular group of patients, clients or staff in the practice setting. 1.4 Monitors, reviews and reports upon the standard of nursing practice to ensure that colleagues are working within the scope of nursing practice, following appropriate clinical pathways, policies, procedures and adopting a risk management approach in patient care delivery. 1.5 Participates in xxxx rounds/case conferences as appropriate. 1.6 Educates patients/carers in post discharge management and organises discharge summaries/referrals to other services, as appropriate. 1.7 Supports and liaises with patients, carers, colleagues, medical, nursing, allied health, support staff, external agencies and the private sector to provide coordinated multidisciplinary care. 1.8 Completes clinical documentation and undertakes other administrative/management tasks as required. 1.9 Participates in departmental and other meetings as required to meet organisational and service objectives. 1.10 Develops and seeks to implement change utilising expert clinical knowledge through research and evidence based best practice. 1.11 Monitors and maintains availability of consumable stock. 1.12 Complies with and demonstrates a positive commitment to Regulations, Acts and Policies relevant to nursing including the Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia, the Code of Conduct for Nurses in Australia, the National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse and the Poisons Act 2014 and Medicines and Poisons Regulations 2016. 1.13 Promotes and participates in team building and decision making. 1.14 Responsible for the clinical supervision of nurses at Level 1 and/or Enrolled Nurses/ Assistants in Nursing under their supervision.

  • Clinical Studies The animal and other preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by the Company or on behalf of the Company were, and, if still pending are, to the Company’s knowledge, being conducted in all material respects in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the preclinical study and clinical trials of new drugs and biologics as applied to comparable products to those being developed by the Company; the descriptions of the results of such preclinical studies and clinical trials contained in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects, and, except as set forth in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus, the Company has no knowledge of any other clinical trials or preclinical studies, the results of which reasonably call into question the clinical trial or preclinical study results described or referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described; and the Company has not received any written notices or correspondence from the FDA, the EMA, or any other domestic or foreign governmental agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company that are described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!