SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS Sample Clauses

SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. In this part I provide a summary of the key findings of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 in three subsections that relate to one of three contradictions. Each sub-section thereby includes an answer to the overarching research question of this dissertation.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) requested an assessment of global nuclear markets, including the structure of nuclear companies in different countries and the partnerships between reactor vendors and buyers. This report documents the findings of the first phase of the Global Nuclear Markets project, along with a description of the work performed. This includes findings on the countries and companies involved with trade in nuclear reactors and fuel services, market arrangements, and service agreements, in conversion, enrichment, reactor design, construction and operation, and used fuel storage and reprocessing, along with assessment of the trends in these areas. The work was conducted by collecting information of nuclear facilities and service providers, and performing an extensive open-sourced literature search to validate and update the information and to identify agreements and relationships between countries and companies. Chronological information was developed to assist in the identification of market trends. Analysis was then performed to assess overall market conditions and develop insights on developments with the major players. Extensive lists of existing and planned fuel cycle facilities and reactors under construction or planned were developed and general relationships between suppliers and customers identified. Specific relationship identification was limited due to a lack of publicly available information for a systematic assessment. The main sources of facility information were found to be slightly dated and not always in agreement, especially with respect to the status of planned reactor projects and the capacities of existing conversion and enrichment facilities. Efforts to validate data in these areas revealed the constantly changing nature of the information. The main conclusions of the work include:  Financing for a new nuclear reactor projects continue to be a significant obstacle for most countries wanting to include nuclear in their energy mix. o Countries like China and Russia that have the ability to offer financing terms for reactor construction that are outside of the OECD Financing Nuclear projects guideline can have a competitive advantage.  Reactor construction performance seems to have a major impact on where growth is occurring and which providers are obtaining new business. o Average construction times under 6 years in Korea and China may be contributing to domestic growt...
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. This Summary is provided for the convenience of readers. In the event of any difference between this Summary and the body of the Decision, the wording in the body of the Decision shall prevail. Furthermore, the inclusion or omission of particular findings in this Summary should not be construed as an indication of the Board’s view of the relative significance of any of the findings in this Decision.
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. Awareness and use of Quality improvement checklists is high in Mozambique and Kenya. This has probably contributed to improved performance by community-based workers and as such had an impact on improved food security in the target communities. Monitoring and evaluation capacity was strengthened, but losses of key management staff during the past two years has left gaps in Mozambique and Kenya for their new DAPs.
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. FHI had a significant impact on the M&E working group in terms of its contributions as chair of the working group and in terms of research and other support that went into the development of the M&E toolkit.
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. The local capacity working group was less active than anticipated and FHI’s involvement has been restricted to commenting on documents generated by the group as a result of a lack of staff.
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. This research found empirical evidence in support of indicators of complexity theory- based organising within London’s TB control system. However, some of these precepts manifested themselves in a negative manner, helping to explain the inertia which seems to have gripped the system for so long. This is seen as due to the strong and on- going influence within the UK healthcare sector from deeply embedded NPM-inspired principles. The research also found that medical consultants exercised limited influence and power over the organisational response to TB in London, despite being virtually universally identified by research respondents as (potentially) the dominant force within the TB control system. This unexpected finding of weak professional dominance was also attributed to the ongoing influence of NPM. Finally, an inductive analysis of the collected data suggested tuberculosis control in London is a very low priority on both the general healthcare and the public health agendas. A health problem has not become a health issue, or in the language of Kingdon (1995), an identified condition has not become a problem. This situation is surprising given the communicable nature of TB and the growing incidence of drug resistant TB. However, the harsh “real politik” of the situation means there is little upside for key players and entities within the system to expend political capital in pushing TB control up the health policy agenda and advancing the necessary reforms to improve the current system.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS. The key findings discussed in the previous chapters are summarized below according to the research questions.
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS 
Sample 1

Related to SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS

  • Recognition and Unit Description 1.1. The Employer recognizes the Association, which shall serve as exclusive Representative of all classified employees in the bargaining unit. The Association recognizes the responsibility of representing the interest of all employees in the unit without discrimination for the purpose as set forth in this Agreement.

  • Summary of Benefits Plan Feature Employee Co-pay - Network Only Preventive and Diagnostic Services • Examination • Cleaning • x-rays $0 $0 $0 Minor Restorative • Fillings and extractions • Oral surgery • Endodontic services1 • Periodontal services1 $0 $40-$196 based on specific service $45-$310 based on specific service $25-$145 based on specific service 1 Additional employee co-pay if approved specialist performs services. Major Restorative • Crowns • Bridges • Complete Dentures $92-$190 based on specific service $115-$291 based on specific service $249-$264 based on specific service Complete Orthodontics $1,850 co-pay D PPO “Buy Up” Option (Voluntary) Summary of Benefits Plan Feature In Network/Out of Network Class I (Preventative) 100%/100% Class II (Basic/Restorative) 80%/80% Class III (Major) 60%/60% Class IV (Orthodontia - adult ortho is included) 50%/50% Annual Deductible per Member (does not apply to Class I services) $50/$50 Orthodontia Lifetime Max $1,500/$1,500

  • Compensation Schedule Except as otherwise provided herein, employees shall be compensated within the pay range assigned to the classification of the position in which they are employed and in accordance with the pertinent conditions of employment enumerated in this Agreement. Sec. 503 REGULAR PAY DAY: Employees shall be paid on or about the Friday following the end of the biweekly payroll period.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Distribution of Public Keys Each of Registry Operator and Escrow Agent will distribute its public key to the other party (Registry Operator or Escrow Agent, as the case may be) via email to an email address to be specified. Each party will confirm receipt of the other party’s public key with a reply email, and the distributing party will subsequently reconfirm the authenticity of the key transmitted via offline methods, like in person meeting, telephone, etc. In this way, public key transmission is authenticated to a user able to send and receive mail via a mail server operated by the distributing party. Escrow Agent, Registry Operator and ICANN will exchange public keys by the same procedure.

  • Disclosure Statement for Xxxx IRAs 1. Am I Eligible to Contribute to a Xxxx XXX? Anyone with compensation income whose Modified Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) does not exceed the limits described below is eligible to contribute to a Xxxx XXX. (For convenience, all future references to compensation are deemed to mean “earned income” in the case of a self- employed individual.) Employers may also contribute to Xxxx IRAs established for the benefit of their employees. You may also establish a Xxxx XXX to receive rollover contributions or transfers from another Xxxx XXX or, in some cases, from a Traditional IRA. A Qualified Rollover Contribution can be made to a Xxxx XXX and is a distribution from an IRA that meets the requirements of section 408(d)(3), a rollover from a designated Xxxx account described in section 402A, or a rollover from an eligible retirement plan as described in section 402(c)(8)(B).

  • Evaluation Schedule CLIENT REFERENCES The Tenderer shall provide details of his performance on each of the previous projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. “Client Reference Scorecards” will be completed by each of the respective Clients for the projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. The following are to be completed by the Client and Principal Agent and is to be supported in each case by a letter of award and the works completion certificate. Both Client and Principal Agent must sign and stamp the documents, failure to obtain both signatures and stamps will result in no allocation of points. PROJECT NAME and SCOPE OF WORK: Principal agent: ................................................................................................................................. Client: .. ..............................................................................................................................................

  • Action Item Task MSU Status Comments I.1 The University will employ and empower a Clery Act compliance professional (CCP). The CCP must report to a Vice President (VP) or equivalent. The CCP must not be employed in or under the sole authority of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Implemented The Office of Audit, Risk and Compliance (OARC) hired a qualified candidate who began work in February 2020.

  • Classification Plan Revisions A. The Employer will provide to the Union, in writing, any proposed changes to the classification plan including descriptions for newly created classifications. Upon request of the Union, the Employer will bargain, in accordance with Article 37, Mandatory Subjects, the effect(s) of a change to an existing class or newly proposed classification.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.