Supplier Assessment. The suppliers are regularly assessed by the LEIBER Group based on relevant performance parameters and for comparing the performance of various suppliers. The criteria below, among others, are considered here: Delivery quality Delivery reliability Reaction time to complaints Acceptance of costs from complaints If the agreed-upon target specifications are not met, the supplier must create action plans and present them to the LEIBER Group. This particularly also applies to the supplier assessments and audit results communicated from the LEIBER Group. The rating as "A supplier" for all business fields of the LEIBER Group is the aspiration for every supplier and serves to assure the quality of the scope of delivery. If a supplier is rated as a "B supplier", they must make a written statement regarding the individual criteria listed in the supplier assessment. If a supplier is rated as a "C supplier", they must make a written statement regarding the individual criteria listed in the supplier assessment and inform the LEIBER Group about constructive approaches regarding these criteria with new target values. This concept must be submitted in writing to the LEIBER Group immediately. Depending on the degree the target values are exceeded, the LEIBER Group reserves the right to execute suitable escalation programs. These indicators are for adapting the rating, effecting any measures for supplier development and are taken into consideration for queries and contract negotiations for new/modified products.
Supplier Assessment. SUSPA evaluates each supplier at least once a year along the following criteria: | Customer-driven quality (yard holds, field returns, production stop by SUSPA customer caused by supplier of SUSPA) | Supplier quality | On-time delivery | Supplier response (due to defect com- plaint report) | Premium freight (premium freights from SUSPA to customer, caused by supplier of SUSPA) | Special status With these criteria the supplier will be classified as A, B or C supplier. B and C sup- pliers must develop and inform about measures that will enable an A classification in the short or medium term.
Supplier Assessment. Weckerle Machines reserves the right to assess its suppliers by a supplier assessment into categories. The assessment criteria are the sole discretion of Weckerle Machines and the supplied is not entitled to review them. Consequently, the supplier does not have any right to obtain information regarding the methods of such classification. Weckerle Machines will primarily base its assessment of the supplier on the parameters « product quality » and « delivery performance ». Weckerle Machines will inform the supplier at request of the result of the assessment.
Supplier Assessment. The supplier assessment shall be carried out annually. The Supplier shall be notified of the result in writing.
Supplier Assessment. Each calendar year, suppliers are evaluated to show compliance with the AlphaUSA’s quality goals. Key supplier performance shall be monitored through the following indicators: Delivered product conformity to requirements (Internal Quality Concerns). Customer disruptions including product returns (External Quality Concerns). Delivery schedule performance (Late Shipments). Supplier shall monitor the performance of their manufacturing processes.
Supplier Assessment. For us, the supplier evaluation is an important instrument to ensure a continuous delivery quality and as a decision criterion when ordering. This is done as part of a quarterly supplier assessment based on the criteria listed below. Quality management system and environmental management system certified according to ISO 9001, IATF 16949, ISO 14001 Quality of deliveries Number of complaints Deliveries on time Compliance with deliveries Number of incidents associated with additional freight costs Number of customer malfunctions Quality assurance agreement Confidentiality Agreement Depending on their importance, the listed criteria are subject to weighting factors. If you have any questions about the weighting factors, please contact the employee who is responsible for your purchase at USM. Supplier classification: A = acceptable delivery quality ≥90…<100 points AB = satisfactory delivery quality ≥80…<90 points B = unsatisfactory delivery quality ≥70…<80 points C = unacceptable delivery quality <70 points The result of the supplier evaluation is communicated in writing within 20 working days by the purchase to the supplier. If the supplier receives a rating of poor A, further measures are required, which the supplier takes from the cover letter for supplier evaluation and, if necessary, implements independently. The measures are communicated to the purchasing department within 10 working days in the form of an action plan. In some cases (e.g. supplier classification B, C or a falling total number of points) it can be assumed that the QM system is checked by means of a supplier audit.
Supplier Assessment. ZEISS regularly conducts supplier assessments based on the GOODS and SERVICES supplied by the SUPPLIER; amongst other things, these assessments are also considered when selecting suppliers and when considering further collaboration with the SUPPLIER. The supplier assessment is also the basis for the joint determination of quality objectives with the SUPPLIER in order to achieve continuous improvement. If these objectives are not achieved and depending on the case in point, a supplier development program may be agreed between the PARTIES in order to ensure that the SUPPLIER'S planned supply performance is achieved; alternatively the volume of deliveries may be reduced or the SUPPLIER may even be black-listed. The assessment is based on supplier-related logistics and quality data (HARD FACTS). In the case of suppliers with the status of "Managed Supplier" or "Strategic Partner", criteria such as QM systems, health and safety/environmental management systems, logistics, price level, technology and commercial requirements (SOFT FACTS) will also be assessed. Compliance with the provisions agreed in this QAA will also be taken into consideration in the supplier assessment.
Supplier Assessment. New Suppliers will be required to satisfactorily complete an initial order without issue prior to receiving “approved vendor” status. First Articles may be requested if the requirement is "flowed down" by NPI’ customer. In some cases, special forms such as AS9102 current revision may be required and will be noted on the Purchase Order. This form must be returned with product unless a waiver is received by the Supplier prior to shipping product back to NPI, along with expected date of completion.
Supplier Assessment. Xxxxx shall regularly assess suppliers on the basis of quality, environmental and logistic aspects. The suppliers shall be provided with the assessment criteria. Measures resulting from the supplier assessment shall be defined and implemented by the suppliers. If need be, possible necessary audits (see 4.1) shall be derived from this.
Supplier Assessment. The Client will compile assessments for the Contractor. The Client will inform the Contractor of the criteria and the results. Objectives and measures for improvement will be agreed together. The Client will give the Contractor appropriate support.
