Transportation Concurrency. 1. For all development located within the AAA, the Port shall use the SEPA environmental review process to evaluate and address concurrency requirements that relate to airport development.
Transportation Concurrency. Concurrency certificate for traffic was issued on May 17 , 2016 .
Transportation Concurrency. Pursuant to review of various traffic analyses, and consistent with the LDC the parties agree that the Project satisfies the City’s traffic concurrency requirements and shall be vested for a period not to exceed three (3) years upon adoption of the MPD Ordinance.
Transportation Concurrency. The Developer shall prepare a traffic study based on the criteria located in Section 4 of the City of Palm Coast Technical Manual. The new square footage will be added to the current square footage and the site will be analyzed as a whole. Concurrency will be based off of the new square footage and compared to current traffic and vested trips to determine whether there is enough capacity to vest the additional trips.
Transportation Concurrency. A traffic analysis has been submitted to the City that demonstrates that concurrency for the Project will be met. Any future concurrency analysis shall consider only new trips generated by the Project (trips in addition to those generated by the previous use on the site). Concurrency for the Project may be reserved upon the non-refundable payment of 25% of the applicable City impact fees by the Developer which payment shall be calculated to include those impact fees paid by the Developer prior to the date of this PUD Agreement. These fees shall be nonrefundable, but shall be credited against total impact fees due for the Project. The vesting of capacity will run with the vesting of the project, and cannot be transferred to another project.
Transportation Concurrency. Concurrency certificates for traffic were issued on November 4th, 2015.
Transportation Concurrency. The City’s transportation concurrency ordinance was 384 adopted in accordance with a requirement of the Growth Management Act (“GMA”) (RCW 385 36.70A.060(6)(b)). The GMA requires the City to determine that transportation facility 386 improvements or strategies will be in place concurrently with land development. “Concurrent with 387 the development” is defined by the GMA to mean that any necessary “improvements or strategies 388 are in place at the time of development or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the 389 improvements or strategies within six years.” Pursuant to LMC Ch. 12.22, the City has determined 390 that the Allowable Development Capacity meets the City’s standards for transportation 391 concurrency and mitigates any significant adverse impacts to the City’s transportation system as 392 provided in Table 1 (“Phased Concurrency Capacity Allocation Schedule”) that establishes 393 concurrency for the Project over three phases (“Concurrency Phases”); provided that the Project 394 is developed in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, including any requirement that 395 Owner pay transportation impact fees as required. The City agrees that no further concurrency 396 review and/or mitigation of transportation impacts are required for the Concurrency Phases.
Transportation Concurrency. Based on the Traffic Study (as amended) attached here to as Exhibit 4, traffic concurrency is met for the proposed Project. Traffic concurrency is vested through the Site Plan approval process as outlined in the City’s LDC. Due to the extent of detail provided in the Conceptual Master Plan and related traffic studies, traffic concurrency is vested for one
Transportation Concurrency. The Owners acknowledge thathave submitted to the Town has performed an overalla traffic analysis entitled “Cumulative Traffic Study for Xxxxx- in-the-Hills” dated November 27, 2006 [study is marked DRAFT - date, title, and findings within the study may change when study is finalized] which includes a cumulative review of the traffic study completed by the Owners for the Project, the traffic study completed by Venezia (North and South), and the traffic study completed by Mission Rise regarding, but not limited to, the impacts to SR 00, XX 00, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx., X. Xxxxxx Road, Number 2 Road, North Buckhill Road, and Florida Avenue. The Town will work with the Owners to prepare a specific agreement regarding the proportionate share of any improvements needed for the Project, as well as the timing of the improvements. The Owners shall be responsible to pay for the fair share of improvements found to be necessary by the Town to develop the Project.prepared by Traffic & Mobility Consultants, LLC and dated (the “Study”). If the results of the Study require any mitigation for traffic generation, the Town and the Owners work together and with any other applicable jurisdiction as required by applicable law to address such mitigation requirements.
Transportation Concurrency. Pursuant to review of the traffic analysis for the Project (Exhibit “3”), it appears that roadway capacity exists to support the proposed increase in development density. A traffic study showing the correct number of units shall be submitted at the time of Site Plan application. Reservation of traffic concurrency shall be made only upon issuance of a Development Order (DO) for the Site Plan.
