Unit of Measure. Accountable contract number or equivalent code designation.
Unit of Measure. For embedded subassemblies, components, and parts that require DoD unique item identification under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this clause, the Contractor shall report as part of, or associated with the Material Inspection and Receiving Report specified elsewhere in this contract, the following information:
Unit of Measure. The unit of measure applicable to the service/feature being offered by the Contractor.
Unit of Measure. Number of representatives Disaggregated by: Location; Respondent Sex; Youth vs. Non-Youth Respondent Justification & Management Utility: This will allow XXXXX-K to monitor the involvement of some of the key stakeholders in the governance and democracy process within the project. Data Collection Method: Documenting the number of representatives based on source documentation Data Source: Activity (training, workshop, form, mass media) reports; Grantee Workplans; Grantee Reports Frequency and Timing of Data Acquisition: Annual Estimated Cost of Data Acquisition: No additional cost to the program Individual(s) Responsible: XXX Specialist Location of Data Storage: Data will be uploaded to FHI 360’s SharePoint Date of Initial Data Quality Assessment: TBD Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): N/A Action Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: N/A Date of Future Data Quality Assessments: TBD Procedures for Future Data Quality Assessments: See Annex 3 – Data Quality Assessment Process Data Analysis: Data will be aggregated and analyzed based on the location Presentation of Data: Tables and narrative explanations highlighting notable achievements and disaggregation Reporting of Data: Data will be reported annually in SADES-K’s QPRs through the PITT table Notes on Baselines/Targets: The baseline for this activity is 0. The LOP target will be 150 representatives Other Notes THIS SHEET WAS LAST UPDATED ON: 19 February 2019 USAID Development Objective (1): Devolution effectively implemented USAID Intermediate Result (1.3): Informed and empowered citizens participate in county affairs Name of Result Area (3): Civic and democratic space protected Name of Indicator (6): Number of USG-assisted media-outlets and media-sector CSOs and institutions that serve to strengthen the independent media or journalists Unit of Measure: Number of CSOs and support institutions Disaggregated by: Location; Entity Type (e.g. CSO, Media Outlet, Institution)
Unit of Measure. In general, unless specified otherwise in the XXXX for the applicable SUSE Product or other written agreement between the parties, the unit of measure for a Subscription Offering is the metric specified in Exhibit A (“Unit”).
Unit of Measure. Individuals Activities/Implementing Mechanisms: Pro Public Data Source: Training Reports Method of Data Acquisition: Training Coordinator will submit data after the each training events Frequency and Timing of Data Acquisition: Event based Individual(s) Responsible for Data at USAID : Xxxxxx Xxxx-Xxxxx (AOR), Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx (AAOR) Date of Most Recent Data Quality Assessment and Name(s) of Reviewer(s): Other Notes (optional):
Unit of Measure. Number (of OPI and OCA score)
Unit of Measure. Requested Deliver Time or Date
Unit of Measure. The unit of volume for measurement of all quantities of Gas hereunder shall be one cubic foot of Gas. Atmospheric pressure shall be assumed to be 15.025 pounds per square inch absolute at the Receipt Point(s) and Delivery Point(s) irrespective of the actual atmospheric pressure at such points from time‑to‑time. Adjustments shall be made for flowing temperature and specific gravity as determined from instruments located at the Receipt Point(s) and Delivery Point(s). Applied Automation Total Flow electronic flow computers will serve as the primary means for Gas measurement on each meter tube. Chart recorders will be provided for back up measurement.
Unit of Measure. Completed CSC Activity (that is either exclusively focused on gender-sensitive component, or which includes gender-sensitivity as part of the assessment). Disaggregated by: Justification and Management Utility: Data Collection Method: Data are collected in several stages in the CSC method (these are detailed in the CSC Toolkit in Stage 3: Developing the community’s Score Card): 1) local stakeholders must generate and prioritize issues, 2) each of the most relevant issues must be transformed into an indicator, 3) indicators must be put onto a matrix where they can be ranked on a Likert scale of 1-5 (along with an area for notes), 4) the score card is used in FGDs with clients, 5) optional: the score card is used in discussions with service providers, 6) optional: the clients and service providers use the score card results in a facilitated discussion that leads to 7) an interface meeting and/or action planning. Data Collation Method: Data collation is a simple task of reporting average scores for each indicator on the score card. Where there are clear divergences in data (for example, FGDs of women and girls rank a service poorly where men and boys rank it very highly) these can be explored during the interface meeting with the help of a facilitator, or at a minimum circulated to service providers to help them better understand the demand for their service (or changes to their service model). Frequency and Timing of Data Acquisition: As necessary, but recommended during the first year of LIFT II TA to referral networks. While a single instance of the CSC activity can examine how service providers’ current programming reflects needs identified during the SA (see LIFT II Indicator 2.3.0), it may be worthwhile to conduct this activity on an annual basis using the same Score Card indicators and assessing change over time. Individual Responsible for Providing Data to USAID: LIFT II M&E Specialist Individual Responsible at USAID: Varies by country Estimated Cost of Data Acquisition: TBD as LIFT II has not conducted this activity in any country yet Data Analysis: The CSC method generates quantitative data based on the indicators included on the score card. These measures provide insight how different social groups perceive services within the membership of the referral network client base and no complicated analysis is necessary beyond descriptive statistics. The CSC toolkit advises repeating the score card exercise across villages (and to keep an eye out for dive...
