Usf Holland Sample Clauses

Usf Holland. USF Holland historically has not hard the ability to utilize employees in a non-CDL, dock only classification. As a result, dock and other non-driving work at Holland has been performed by CDL-qualified employees.; While this arrangement provided certain advantages over the years, the industry-wide shortage of CDL-qualified employees has forced Holland to rely increasingly on non-union local cartage companies and other non-union third parties to deliver freight while its own CDL-qualified employees are performing non-driving work. In many instances, this is the case even though CDL-qualified employees at Holland would prefer to spend more time driving. The arrangement also created situations where employees who lose their CDL license through no fault of their own may not remain employed at Holland. The parties recognized that this situation required a review of Holland’s ability to utilize dock only positions that do not require a CDL. Making this additional resource available will permit Holland to reduce its reliance on third parties, bring work back into the bargaining unit, and improve its overall service performance. It also will provide additional opportunities for CDL-qualified employees at Holland to perform more driving work throughout the course of a shift. In addition, dock only positions will afford work opportunities for employees who through no fault of their own lose their CDL license. To this end, Holland may establish dock-only positions where a CDL license is not required. Seniority shall continue to prevail in the selection of terminal bid postings and a senior CDL-qualified employee shall not be restricted from selecting the bid of her/her choice, including dock bids. For example, if a bid is posted for thirty (30) driving positions and twenty-five (25) are filled, the Employer cannot force CDL-qualified employees into those openings if they utilize their seniority to bid a dock position.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Usf Holland 
Sample 1

Related to Usf Holland

  • Real Property Holding Corporation The Company is not and has never been a U.S. real property holding corporation within the meaning of Section 897 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Company shall so certify upon Purchaser’s request.

  • Asset Management Supplier will: i) maintain an asset inventory of all media and equipment where Accenture Data is stored. Access to such media and equipment will be restricted to authorized Personnel; ii) classify Accenture Data so that it is properly identified and access to it is appropriately restricted; iii) maintain an acceptable use policy with restrictions on printing Accenture Data and procedures for appropriately disposing of printed materials that contain Accenture Data when such data is no longer needed under the Agreement; iv) maintain an appropriate approval process whereby Supplier’s approval is required prior to its Personnel storing Accenture Data on portable devices, remotely accessing Accenture Data, or processing such data outside of Supplier facilities. If remote access is approved, Personnel will use multi-factor authentication, which may include the use of smart cards with certificates, One Time Password (OTP) tokens, and biometrics.

  • Bank Holding Company Borrower is not a “bank holding company” or a direct or indirect subsidiary of a “bank holding company” as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and Regulation Y thereunder of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

  • Investment Company; Public Utility Holding Company Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is an "investment company" or a company "controlled" by an "investment company" within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or a "public utility holding company" within the meaning of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended.

  • Real Property Holding Company The Company is not a real property holding company within the meaning of Section 897 of the Code.

  • Bank Holding Company Act Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates is subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”) and to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates owns or controls, directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of any class of voting securities or twenty-five percent or more of the total equity of a bank or any entity that is subject to the BHCA and to regulation by the Federal Reserve. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates exercises a controlling influence over the management or policies of a bank or any entity that is subject to the BHCA and to regulation by the Federal Reserve.

  • Financial Services The aim of cooperation shall be to achieve closer common rules and standards in areas including the following:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!