Xxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxx. Decision stating Reasons for Trial Chamber’s Ruling of 1 June 1999 Rejecting Defence Motion to Supress Evidence (25 June 1999) IT-95-14/2- T.
Xxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxx. 2 Homeland Security grants requested by Town Manager Xxxx Xxxxxxx provide videocameras and DVR system, ‘Go Bags’ for VCS One of the things that Xxxx Xxxxxxx does routinely in his combined role as Town Man- ager, Police Chief, and Fire Chief for the Town of Veazie, is to scan the list of grants that are announced periodically by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Twice in the past two years, he’s recognized grants that would benefit the School Depart- ment rather than the town and applied for the grants anyway. Two years ago, he secured a $12,000 Home- land Security grant that funded 16 videocam- eras and a DVR system for the school, as well as an automated access control system. Most recently, he received DHS approval for a $5,300 grant for several emergency needs, including firefighting foam for the fire depart- ment, all-hazards simulation training for fire, police, and EMS personnel, a mobile major medical kit for Xxxxxx Community School and “Go Bags” for every classroom. In the event of an evacuation or relocation of the student body, the major medical kit will pro- vide the supplies needed to triage small-scale injuries, so that first responders can focus on the most significant injuries. Similarly, the “Go Bags” have first-aid supplies that teachers can Town, school collaboration agents, head hunters, and hospital recruiting offices,” says Matt. “Hos- pitals have teams of people whose job is finding places for new doctors to live in the Bangor area. We want those doctors to choose Veazie.” Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx is also help- ing the town develop a logo, which should be ready this spring. Xxxx noted that as the group worked through the process, they learned that what they’re trying to do is unique in the area. “The school and the town are working together to promote and advertise our town,” he said. “We want to have a ready-to-go packet for prospective home-buyers and school- use in an emergency. Xxxx Xxx, VCS Principal and Superintendent of Schools for Veazie, said Xxxx didn’t have to apply for grants for the school. “The town had its own funding needs, but Xxxx recognized that some grant programs would be very beneficial to the school,” Matt said. “He reached out, made the choice to in- clude the school, and wrote the grants. Both the school and the town are better off as a result.” The 16 videocameras that were purchased with the 2016 grant are mounted strategically inside and outside the school. The system includes a small video screen in the p...
Xxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxx. (Appeal Judgment) IT-95-14/2-A (17 December 2004) § 117; Prosecutor v. Vasiljevid (Appeal Judgment) IT-98- 32-A (25 February 2004) § 16; Prosecutor x. Xxxxx (Trial Judgment) IT-98-29-T (5 December 2003) § 152-154; Prosecutor x. Xxxxxxxxxx & Xxxxx (Trial Judgment) IT-02-60-T (17 January 2005) § 626-627. 372 Ford, ‘Is The Failure To Respond Appropriately To A Natural Disaster A Crime Against Humanity? The Responsibility To Protect And Individual Criminal Responsibility In The Aftermath Of Cyclone Nargis’, (n 109) 243. for both inhumane acts and persecution; therefore as crimes against humanity.373 With regard to extermination as potential crime against humanity, it goes to reason that a certain ‘number’ or ‘amount’ of persons must be affected. The ICTY has argued that less than 1700 people or, in referral to the Nuremberg Tribunal, even less than 800 people may be sufficient to amount to ‘extermination’; declaring itself unwilling to suggest a threshold, although a ‘collective’ element should be present rather than singling out individuals.374 Some have argued that individual responsibility for torture (7(1)(f)), persecution (7(1)(h)) and murder (7(1)(a)) as crimes against humanity may also be incurred when humanitarian aid is obstructed.375 Yet, Articles 7 and 8 ICC Statute contain specific clauses related directly to the provision of aid and the obstruction thereof, as well as related to the denial of access or targeting of those providing humanitarian aid, allowing for a more tailored prosecution by way of these provisions. Furthermore, whilst the proper incurrence of individual criminal responsibility for the denial or obstruction of humanitarian assistance is of the utmost importance as the insurance of the provision of aid to those in need is fundamental, it remains important to not attempt to ‘adjust’ the criteria or elements of certain crimes in international law to fit the ‘mould’ of humanitarian assistance. For instance, a too frequent coining of a situation as ‘genocide’ may water down this specific crime. In order for the denial of humanitarian aid to be considered as genocide, a specific kind of intent to destroy a particular group of people must be present; an intent that may be difficult to prove in the case of the denial of aid.376 In fact, the allowance of the provision of humanitarian assistance has been used to argue the lack of genocidal intent in the case of Darfur.377 Conversely, despite not (yet) resulting in specific convictions for t...
Xxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxx. The project will require a range of activities – Xxxxx and Xxxxx both bring analyst-level expertise which will prove valuable for fact-finding, compiling data and handling other aspects of the project.
