Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (‘SRA’). The SRA is the independent regulatory body of the Law Society of England and Wales, and operates within the regulatory framework of the Legal Services Xxx 0000 (and any subsequent amendments).
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. Article 36: Discipline and Dismissal; which are superseded and replaced by the following:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. In general, no part of any fence or wall shall be constructed or placed within the “front yard” of any numbered lot in the subdivision, that is to say, within that part of the lot that lies between the line of the street on which the lot abuts and the required setback from the front line of the lot. No fence or wall shall be constructed or placed within that part of any lot that is contiguous to the lake that lies within 25 feet of the shoreline of the lake and no part of any fence or wall constructed or placed in the “rear yard” of any lot that is contiguous to the lake shall exceed four feet in height. Any fence that is permitted within the subdivision and is not subject to the height limitation set out in the immediately preceding sentence may have a height not in excess of six feet; provided, however, that every permitted fence in the subdivision that exceeds four feet in height shall be of ch ain link or open construction. Xxxxxx shall not exceed five feet in height and shall not obstruct lake view of abutting lot owners. Hedge placement in the rear lot shall be governed by the same rules as for fences.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 5. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth above, after the start of the school year, any newly-created or vacated Special Education Assistant position shall be posted and filled accordingly:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 1. In addition to the pre-student and post-student time set forth in A. above, the teacher work day will be six (6) hours, 15 minutes with a 45 minute lunch period.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. (a) A Temporary Employee shall not have the right to grieve the termination of her employment if such termination occurs at the end of the period for which she was hired.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. (and Xxxxxxxxx, a non-tort case) were, on the contrary, cases in which it was held that causation could be challenged notwithstanding the relevant judgment, whether a summary judgment (as in Xxxxxx) or a judgment in default (as in Lunnun and Carbopego). Xxxx, in Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx, the two tort cases, the defendants were precluded from being able to argue that no loss at all was sustained, because such an argument would be inconsistent with a judgment on liability in circumstances where, in a tort context, there has to be some damage caused by the tort for the cause of action to be complete. However, beyond this the defendants were permitted to take issue with causation. That was the actual decision in Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx, and it was also what Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx V-C made clear in Xxxx Finance, albeit when dealing not with causation but with the question of whether contributory negligence could be advanced in the context of an assessment of damages hearing, in the passage cited by Xxxxxx XX in Lunnun. {59} I am clear, as I say, that, in such circumstances, I must apply the approach explained in Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx, both cases in which damage was a necessary ingredient of the claimant's cause of action: in Xxxxxx, a claim in the tort of negligence; and in Lunnun, a claim in nuisance. Authorities such as Xxxx and New Century, in contrast, were concerned with very different allegations made by the claimants (in each case, the claims were not in tort but for breach of contracts of employment), and the defendants were attempting to advance arguments which went to the question of breach of contract. They were not cases in which the issue was causation, nor were they tort cases where, without damage caused by the relevant breach of duty, there is no cause of action at all. These authorities are, therefore, of only limited assistance in relation to the question which I have to decide.” [44] A similar position was enunciated in the case Merito Financial Services Limited v Xxxxx Xxxxxxx [2016] EWHC 2067 (Ch) where the following was said at paragraphs 41 and 42:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. (e) Notwithstanding articles in the collective agreement pertaining to probation period, regular employees shall not be eligible to apply for another regular posted position within their initial probation period, except by mutual agreement of the Employer and the Union at the local level.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 1. Loss of Property surrendered by the Insured or any Insured Person as a result of an extortion threat communicated to the Insured or an Insured Person which occurs anywhere in the world:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 1. Loss of Xxxxxx paid by the Insured or any Insured Person resulting from any Kidnap.
