Xxxxxx, T. Baasov. When Proteins Start to Make Sense: Fine-tuning of Aminoglycosides for PTC Suppression Therapy. Med. Chem. Commun. 5, 1092-1105 (2014). Invited Review Perspective Article
Xxxxxx, T. A Framework for implementing blockchain technologies to improve supply chain performance (2018). xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/1721.1/113244 10. Folkinshteyn, D., Xxxxxx, M.: Braving Bitcoin: a technology acceptance model (TAM) analysis. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 18(4), 220–249 (2016)
Xxxxxx, T. (2018). Exploring the relationship between sanitation and mental and social well-being: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Social Science & Medicine, 217, 121-134. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/science/article/pii/X0000000000000000. doi:xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.016 Shah, G., Mander, H., Xxxxxxxx, A., Xxxxxx, S., & Deshpande, S. (2006). Untouchability in rural India. New Delhi: Sage. Xxxxx, S. (2012). What is new in the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan - A comparative analysis of the NBA and the TSC guidelines. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/articles/what-new-xxxxxx-xxxxxx-abhiyan- comparative-analysis-nba-and-tsc-guidelines Spears, D., Ghosh, A., & Cumming, O. (2013). Open defecation and childhood stunting in India: an ecological analysis of new data from 112 districts. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73784. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073784 Xxxxxx, B., Xxxxx, D., Xxxxx, T., Xxxxxxxx, J., & Xxxxxx, J. (2016). Effect of sanitation and water treatment on intestinal protozoa infection: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Lancet Infect Dis, 16(1), 87-99. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00349-7 Statistics Times. (2018). List of Indian States by Population. Retrieved from xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/demographics/population-of-indian-states.php Toppr. (2019). Development of Panchayati Raj. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/guides/civics/panchayati-raj/development-of-panchayati- raj/ UNICEF - India. (n.d.). Eliminate open defecation. Retrieved from xxxx://xxxxxx.xx/whatwedo/11/eliminate-open-defecation Watanabe, K., & Petri, W. A. (2016). Environmental Enteropathy: Elusive but Significant Subclinical Abnormalities in Developing Countries. EBioMedicine, 10, 25-32. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/science/article/pii/X0000000000000000. doi:xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.030
Xxxxxx, T. Xxxxxx.xxx any use Standard No Xxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLINICAL public domain any use Standard No TRIALS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMUNITY Day in my life Xxxxxx.xxx any use Standard No In the Spotlight Individual deals - Standard No please inquire ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No HEALTH SITE Xxxxxx.xxx any use Standard REVIEWS STANDARD DISCLAIMER This information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without consulting with a qualified healthcare provider. Please consult your healthcare provider with any questions or concerns you may have regarding your condition.
Xxxxxx, T. Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, one nominee of Benchmark and one nominee of Softbank. The directors nominated by Benchmark and Softbank shall be classified as "Class II" directors as described in the Company's By-laws.
Xxxxxx, T. E. XxXxx May 1, 1996 Mr. X. X. Xxxx Xxxernational Representative International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Cement, Lime, Gypsum and Allied Workers Division 80 Sxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Subject: Letter of Understanding Current Practices Dear J. C.: This will confirm our discussions during 1996 contract negotiations. The Company will continue our current policies regarding safety procedures, uniforms, and employee travel expenses at our Louisville and Quarry operations during the life of this Agreement for the following: o Supply to employees personal protective safety equipment required by the Company such as hard hats, safety shoes not to exceed two (2) pairs per year up to $110 per pair, hearing protection, safety glasses, and respirators. o License fee reimbursement for blasting and welding certification as required by the Company. o Current uniform arrangements. o Reasonable reimbursement for meals and other expenses while traveling on Company business. Sincerely, Bernxxx X. Xxxxxxx Director, Employee Relations BMR:mjb
Xxxxxx, T. E. XxXxx
Xxxxxx, T. E. XxXxx 29 32 May 1, 1996 Mr. X. X. Xxxx Xxxernational Representative International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Cement, Lime, Gypsum and Allied Workers Division 80 Sxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Subject: Letter of Understanding - Dispute Resolution Panel Dear J.C.: This will confirm our discussion during 1996 negotiations covering Louisville Operations regarding the Dispute Resolution Panel. The Parties agree to select by mutual agreement three (3) impartial representatives who will be available to serve for the term of this Agreement for a reasonable fee when called upon to serve on the Panel. When necessary for the Panel to meet to resolve a grievance in accordance with Article 10.1(4), the Parties will mutually select one of these impartial representatives to serve on the Panel. It is understood that following the discussions and hearing of the grievance, the Panel will determine the outcome of the grievance. The outcome of the grievance will be determined by majority vote of the Panel and communicated by a brief written description of the disposition of the grievance by the impartial representative. The individual vote of the Panel will not be disclosed, only the fact that a majority was reached. If additional information is needed prior to making a determination on the result of the grievance, it must be gathered and the decision will be made within three (3) working days. The Company or Union representatives may call upon various witnesses to be present at the hearing and the cost incurred or lost-time pay involved for the witness will be the responsibility of the Party calling the witness. The Company or Union Representative may cancel the use of any third party representative with thirty (30) days notice to the other Party and another impartial representative will be selected in accordance with the above. Sincerely, Bernxxx X. Xxxxxxx Director, Employee Relations BMR:mjb
Xxxxxx, T. E. XxXxx May 1, 1996 Mr. X. X. Xxxx Xxxernational Representative Cement, Lime, Gypsum, and Allied Workers Division International Brotherhood of Boilermakers 80 Sxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Re: Letter of Understanding - Working Spouse Dear J. C.: Xursuant to our discussions during the 1996 Kosmosdale Labor Contract negotiations, if an employee's spouse is eligible for health care coverage under another employer's group health plan, that spouse will not be eligible to participate in the Southdown Medical Plan. If the premium which the spouse is required to pay exceeds $30.00 per month for individual coverage under that plan, the Company will offset the cost in excess of $30.00 per month by reducing the employee's monthly contribution to the Southdown Plan. The offset will not be greater than the total monthly premium the employee is required to pay for the Southdown Plan. Affected employees will provide reasonable documentation to substantiate the cost of spousal coverage. Sincerely, Bernxxx X. Xxxxxxx Director, Employee Relations BMR:mjb
Xxxxxx, T. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx and ------------------------- Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, (b) the term "Actual Knowledge" shall mean actual knowledge ---------------- (as opposed to, and not including, constructive, imputed, assumed or other knowledge, and without any obligation or duty of any kind to investigate or otherwise make inquiry) first obtained on or after September 13, 1999 and on or prior to February 23, 2001, and (c) the term "Section 1.3.3.1 Claim" shall mean a written claim that (x) is made to Lessor by any governmental agency or private party that is not an Affiliate of Tenant, (y) is based upon an act or omission of Tenant that constitutes a breach or default by Tenant of the Original Master Lease, and (z) describes the occurrence of an event that constitutes such a breach or default by Tenant (other than a breach or default in the performance of Tenant"s obligations relative to payment of real estate taxes and assessments relating to any of the Leased Properties and/or payment of any amounts owed on account of work performed at, or materials provided to, any Leased Property, it being agreed that claims based on any such breach or default by Tenant shall in no event be considered a "Section 1.3.3.1 Claim" and that no representation or warranty is made in this Section 1.3.3.1 regarding any breach or default of the --------------- nature referenced in this parenthetical clause). Lessor and Tenant further agree that (i) Tenant shall have no rights or remedies against Lessor on account of any breach of the representation and warranty of Lessor contained in this Section 1.3.3.1 other than the rights and remedies set forth in subsection (ii) --------------- below and (ii) any act or omission by Tenant that satisfies the terms of subsections (1) and (2) above shall not constitute an Event of Default under the Original Master Lease or this Lease unless and until, and shall constitute such an Event of Default only if, an Event of Default shall occur on account of Tenant"s failure (A) to perform its indemnification obligations under the Original Master Lease or this Lease relative to any such act or omission and (B) to cure any such indemnification non-performance within the cure period applicable to such indemnification non-performance. Tenant"s aforesaid indemnification obligations shall remain enforceable by Lessor, notwithstanding any breach by Lessor of its representation and warranty contained in this Section 1.3.3.1 and without any limitation on, or impairment of, such ...
