Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.
Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a
Organizational conflicts of interest means conflicts that arise when the University cannot provide an Entity with impartial advice. This arises when technical advice that is given is biased and/or gives the University an unfair advantage.
Examples of Organizational conflicts of interest in a sentence
For example, in accordance with Section H, H106, Avoidance of Organizational Conflicts of Interest, identifying any situation in which the potential for a conflict of interest exists.
These statements shall be in response to the VAAR provision 852.209-70 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (Jan 2008) and fully outlined in response to the subject attachment in Section D of the solicitation document.
Organizational Conflicts of Interest It is understood and agreed that some of the work performed under this subcontract may place the Subcontractor or its personnel in the position of having an organizational conflict of interest.
See Section 7 for information regarding Organizational Conflicts of Interest.
For example, in accordance with Section H, H106, Avoidance of Organizational Conflicts of Interest, identifying any situation in which the potential for a conflict of interest exists is required.
More Definitions of Organizational conflicts of interest
Organizational conflicts of interest means the existence any past, present or currently planned interests of Contractor that either directly or indirectly (through a client, contractual, financial, organizational or other relationship) relates to the Services and which may diminish Contactor’s capacity to give impartial, technically sound, objective assistance and advice, or may give Contractor unfair negotiating advantage with respect to the Department.
Organizational conflicts of interest means a circumstance arising out of a Designer’s relationship with the State, a circumstance arising out of a Designer’s existing or past activities, business or financial interests, familial relationships, contractual relationships, and/or organizational structure (i.e., parent entities, subsidiaries, Affiliates, etc.) that results in:
.1 Impaired Objectivity of Designer;
.2 An Unfair Competitive Advantage;
.3 Biased Ground Rules; and/or .4 A perception or appearance of impropriety, as determined by a member of the State Building Commission or the State Architect, with respect to any of the State’s procurements or contracts, or a perception or appearance of Unfair Competitive Advantage with respect to a State procurement.
Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the awardee is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. The awardee is responsible for ensuring that its sub-awardees and contractors comply with the standards of conduct.
Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.” 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2). An example of an organizational conflict of interest is a situation in which a nonprofit recipient procures services from a for -profit affiliate with EPA funds. Guidance on relationships that make two organizations affiliated is available at 2 CFR 180.905. Under 40 CFR 33.301, a recipient must make good faith efforts to contract with DBEs whenever procuring construction, equipment, services and supplies under an EPA financial assistance agreement. The good faith efforts are required methods to be used by all EPA recipients to ensure DBEs have the opportunity to compete for procurements funded by EPA financial assistance. The regulations at 40 CFR 33.501(a) require a recipient to document its methods used to adhere to the good faith efforts and retain the documentation in the recipient's records. Recipient’s failure to retain proper documentation may constitute noncompliance and result in remedial action as described in 40 CFR 33.105. Examples of proper documentation include, but are not limited to, email logs, phone logs, electronic searches and communication, handouts at conferences, flyers sent to DBEs or similar records. In addition, if one or more of the good faith efforts cannot be performed, EPA recommends that the circumstances that have precluded the efforts be documented and retained in the recipient's records. In addition, Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 33 requires that each procurement contract signed by an EPA financial assistance agreement recipient include the following term and condition: The contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 33 in the award and administration of contracts awarded under EPA financial assistance agreements. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract which may result in the termination of this contract or other legally available remedies. EPA’s Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) provides DBE resources and Training at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/resources-small-businesses. The competition requirements discussed below must take into consideration t...
Organizational conflicts of interest means the existence any past, present or currently planned interests of Contractor that either directly or indirectly (through a client, contractual, financial, organizational or other relationship) relates to the Services and which may diminish Contactor’s capacity to give impartial, technically sound, objective assistance and advice, or may give Contractor unfair negotiating advantage with respect to the Department. Best Pricing Clause Contractor acknowledges and recognizes that the State wants to take advantage of any improvements in premium pricing over the course of the Contract period. To that end, the premium pricing indicated in this Contract is a maximum guarantee. Contractor’s fully-insured premiums under this Contract will not exceed Contractor’s fully-insured premiums then in effect for substantially the same services to any organization with the same or fewer enrollees than the Contractor’s subscriber count at the relevant time. During the term of the Contract, if Contractor implements or provides any other client, whether a public or private entity, with the same or fewer enrollees with premium pricing more favorable than the pricing in this Contract, then Contractor agrees to offer equivalent pricing terms to the Department and the Department and Contractor will execute an amendment of this Contract. The Contractor agrees to annually submit to Department an affidavit from an authorized representative attesting that the Contractor is in compliance with Attachment 1: Affidavit of Best Pricing. The affidavit will be submitted to the Department by December 31st each year. Cooperation with the Inspector General Pursuant to section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes, the Contractor and any subcontractors understand and will comply with their duty to cooperate with the Inspector General in any investigation, audit, inspection, review, or hearing.
Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of other activities or relationships with other entities, the Clearinghouse, its contractors, or significant subcontractors are unable or potentially unable to render impartial services, assistance or advice; the Clearinghouse’s objectivity in performing its function is or might be otherwise impaired; or the Clearinghouse might gain an unfair competitive advantage. “Personal conflict of interest” means a situation in which an employee, officer, or director of the Clearinghouse, the Clearinghouse’s contractors or significant subcontractors has a financial interest, personal activity, or relationship that could impair that person’s ability to act impartially and in the best interest of the transition when performing their assigned role, or is engaged in self-dealing.
Organizational conflicts of interest means the existence any past, present or currently planned interests of Contractor that either directly or indirectly (through a client, contractual, financial, organizational or other relationship) relates to the Services and which may diminish Contactor’s capacity to give impartial, technically sound, objective assistance and advice, or may give Contractor unfair negotiating advantage with respect to the Department. Contractor acknowledges and recognizes that the State wants to take advantage of any improvements in premium pricing over the course of the Contract period. To that end, the premium pricing indicated in this Contract is a maximum guarantee. Contractor’s fully-insured premiums under this Contract will not exceed Contractor’s fully-insured premiums then in effect for substantially the same services to any organization with the same or fewer enrollees than the Contractor’s subscriber count at the relevant time. During the term of the Contract, if Contractor implements or provides any other client, whether a public or private entity, with the same or fewer enrollees with premium pricing more favorable than the pricing in this Contract, then Contractor agrees to offer equivalent pricing terms to the Department and the Department and Contractor will execute an amendment of this Contract. The Contractor agrees to annually submit to Department an affidavit from an authorized representative attesting that the Contractor is in compliance with Attachment 1: Affidavit of Best Pricing. The affidavit will be submitted to the Department by December 31st each year. Pursuant to section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes, the Contractor and any subcontractors understand and will comply with their duty to cooperate with the Inspector General in any investigation, audit, inspection, review, or hearing.