Activity Outputs Sample Clauses

Activity Outputs. CRS DFSA continues to support Government of Ethiopia (GoE) with its efforts to achieve timely disbursement of cash transfers even though this is not a DFSA led activity. Three rounds of Public Work (PW) client cash transfers were scheduled for January- March as normal, however, due to GoE’s implementation challenges, including late funding releases to woredas and new GoE-imposed cash withdrawal limitations, only 70% of the PW January cash transfers were completed in HCS DFSA woredas. Fortunately, in MCS DFSA woredas, the January PW cash transfer was completed. The GoE-led cash transfer to PW clients is supposed to occur from January-March before food transfers begin. Table #1 below shows December’s carryover PDS cash transfer that was done in January. This table reports what was not completed in Q1 but instead was completed in January due to GoE delays. Dire Dawa PSNP officials delayed processing RPASS for food distributions. To overcome this, CRS, HCS and MCS has continued to advocate for food distributions to begin simultaneously with the remaining cash transfers. This is in line with the understanding and agreement that CRS DFSA has with regional and woreda GoE offices in previous years. CRS, HCS and MCS will continue to help expedite the pending cash transfers while leading food distributions to avoid delays and timeliness issues. Table 1: FY 2021 (Q1) PDS Client Cash Transfers Cash transfer October November December January Unique Participants Male Actual 12,303 12,303 0 12,303 12,303 Planned 12,303 12,303 12,303 12,303 12,303 Female Actual 15,088 15,088 0 15,088 15,088 Planned 15,088 15,088 15,088 15,088 15,088 Table 2: FY 2021 (Q2) PDS Client Food Transfers Distribution Amounts January (Round #1) February (Round #2) March (Round #3) Unique Participants Male Actual 11,807 11,807 11,807 11,807 Planned 12,303 12,303 12,303 12,303 Female Actual 14,482 14,482 14,482 14,482 Planned 15,088 15,088 15,088 15,088 iii. Programming Performance
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Activity Outputs. The survey tries to capture the variety of outputs from the partner activities. The results from the output question are categorised into material and immaterial outputs. Overall the most frequently mentioned outputs were documentation and prototypes. ● Material: ○ Prototypes ○ Exhibition ○ Documentation ○ Data ○ Sheets and post-its of participants ○ Maps ● Immaterial: ○ Collaborations ○ Extended network ○ Follow up on participants’ suggestions
Sample 1
Activity Outputs. The FH consortium moved most of the activity targets to the second quarter and beyond due to the repeated suspension of operations and relocation of staff due to insecurity. Quantitative information will be shared in future reports as the activities are completed. Implementing partners focused on implementation of preparatory activities including the PReSERVE start-up workshops, Fiscal Year (FY) 22 Annual Work Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) plan preparation, engaging in the RFSA Refine and Implement (R&I) inception workshops and conducting various assessments during this reporting period. Six out of nine target woredas started implementation of Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) Public Works (PWs) in December 2021. Key activities are discussed below by purpose, sub-purpose and intermediate outcome (IO).
Sample 1
Activity Outputs. During Q3, Ifaa staff and partners made progress on Refine Year initiatives, including all preparations for R&I formative research studies and technical adaptations of new initiatives, as well as continuing to support core PSNP activities. Key cross-cutting outputs include Ifaa’s participation in the PSNP5 Joint Review and Implementation Support (JRIS) Mission at the Federal and Regional-levels, conducting sector-level Technical Working Group (TWG) meetings and supportive field monitoring, participation in JEOP’s monthly Early Warning System TWG, engagement with JEOP to enhance commodity transfer coordination in overlapping woredas, and preparations for the drought response. Sector teams prioritized capacity building for GoE, staff, and partners, strengthening existing structures in continuing woredas, and the roll-out of key Y1 interventions. • Ifaa Staff & Partner Annual Workshop: Ifaa held a three-day workshop from June 1-3 to bring together 90 Ifaa staff, both CRS and partners. During the workshop key topics included Ifaa’s administrative and operational structures related to risk management (fraud, protection/safeguarding, etc.), MEAL systems, partnership principles, as well as a session facilitated by BHA to gain insight on BHA’s priorities and wider PSNP issues.
Sample 1

Related to Activity Outputs

  • Subprojects 1. The Borrower shall make Grants to Beneficiaries (Small Farmers, Municipalities and Organizations) for Subprojects (Farmers’ Business Initiatives, Infrastructure Subprojects and Environmental Subprojects) in accordance with eligibility criteria and procedures acceptable to the Bank as further detailed in the Project Operational Manual.

  • TECHNICAL TASKS Products that require a draft version are indicated by marking “(draft and final)” after the product name in the “Products” section of the task/subtask. If “(draft and final)” does not appear after the product name, only a final version of the product is required. Subtask 1.1 (Products) describes the procedure for submitting products to the CAM.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Design Development Phase Services 3.3.1 Based on the Owner’s approval of the Schematic Design Documents, and on the Owner’s authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Owner’s approval. The Design Development Documents shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans, sections, elevations, typical construction details, and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, and other appropriate elements. The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish, in general, their quality levels.

  • Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5 4 3 2 1 5. The instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Design Development Phase INDICATE IN STATEMENT OF WORK “NOT APPLICABLE” IF SECTION IS NOT APPLICABLE

  • Value Engineering The Supplier may prepare, at its own cost, a value engineering proposal at any time during the performance of the contract. The value engineering proposal shall, at a minimum, include the following;

  • Workforce Development MPC’s technical training program is having a major impact in the region. Online modules, short courses, webinars, and on site/videoconferencing events are reaching state and local transportation department employees and tribal transportation planners. By harnessing the capabilities of the four LTAP centers located at the MPC universities and the multimedia capabilities of the Transportation Learning Network (which was founded and is partly funded by MPC) more than 76 technical training events were offered in the second half of 2015. These training modules and short courses are critical to transportation agencies that need to improve or renew the skills of engineering technicians and other frontline workers. Many MPC courses or training events result in the certification of workers. Even when certification is not required, TLN’s online learning management systems allow employees and employers to set learning goals and monitor progress towards these goals. MPC is making another major impact in workforce development. Altogether, 57 graduate students are working on MPC research projects under the tutelage of faculty researchers. These graduate students represent the researchers and technical analysts of tomorrow. Without the MPC program and the stipend funds that it provides, these students may not be specializing in transportation; but, instead would be seeking career opportunities in other fields. The MPC research program allows faculty to mentor graduate students while allowing the students to work on projects for federal and state transportation agencies—thereby, gaining valuable practical experience.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.