Analysis of Long Term Firm Transmission Service Requests Sample Clauses

Analysis of Long Term Firm Transmission Service Requests. In accordance with applicable procedures under which the Parties provide long-term firm transmission service, the Parties will coordinate the conduct of any studies required to determine the impact of a request for such service. Results of such coordinated studies will be included in the impacts reported to the transmission service customers as appropriate. Coordination of studies will include the following: (a) The Parties will coordinate the calculation of AFC values associated with the service, based on contingencies on the systems of each Party that may be impacted by the granting of the service. (b) Upon either the posting to the OASIS of a request for service or the review of studies related to the evaluation of that service request, the Party receiving the request will determine whether the other Party is potentially impacted. If the other Party is potentially impacted, the Party receiving the request will notify the other Party and convey the information provided in the posting. (c) If the potentially impacted Party determines that its system may be materially impacted by the service, and the nature of the service is such that a request on the potentially impacted Party’s OASIS is unnecessary (i.e., the potentially impacted Party is “off the path”), then that Party will contact the Party receiving the request and request participation in the applicable transmission service studies. The Parties will coordinate with respect to the nature of studies to be performed to test the impacts of the requested service on the potentially impacted Party, who will perform the studies. The Parties will strive to maximize the cost efficiency of the coordinated study process. The JPC will develop screening procedures to assist in the identification of service requests that may impact systems of parties other than the system receiving the request. (d) Any coordinated studies will be performed in accordance with the mutually agreed upon study scope and timeline requirements developed by the Parties. If the Parties cannot mutually agree on the nature and timeline of the studies to be performed they can resolve the differences through the dispute resolution procedures documented in Article XIV of this Agreement. (e) During the System Impact Study, the potentially impacted system may participate in the coordinated study either by taking responsibility for performance of studies of their system, or by providing input to the studies to be performed by the Party receiving t...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (19)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Analysis of Long Term Firm Transmission Service Requests. In accordance with applicable procedures under which the Parties provide long-term firm transmission service, the Parties shall coordinate the conduct of any studies required to determine the impact of a request for such service. For the purpose of determining the potential for Affected System impacts and the need to notify Affected Systems, Parties agree to monitor the other Parties’ systems when conducting long-term transmission service request studies including all facilities rated 100 kV and above with contingencies on the other system’s adjacent Balancing Authority Areas as appropriate in the judgement of the Direct Connect System. Results of any requiredsuch coordinated studies will be included in the impacts reported to the transmission service customers as appropriate. Coordination of studies shallwill include the following: 8.49.3.3.1 The Parties shall coordinate the calculation of AFC values associated with the service, based on contingencies on the systems of each Party that may be impacted by the granting of the service.
Sample 1Sample 2
Analysis of Long Term Firm Transmission Service Requests. In accordance with applicable procedures under which the Parties provide long-term firm transmission service, the Parties shall coordinate the conduct of any studies required to determine the impact of a request for such service. For the purpose of determining the potential for Affected System impacts and the need to notify Affected Systems, Parties agree to monitor the other Parties’ systems when conducting long-term transmission service request studies including all facilities rated 100 kV and above with contingencies on the other system’s adjacent Balancing Authority Areas as appropriate in the judgement of the Direct Connect System. Results of any required coordinated studies will be included in the impacts reported to the transmission service customers as appropriate. Coordination of studies shall include the following: 8.4.3.1 Upon either the posting to the OASIS or New Services Queue of a request for service or review of studies related to the evaluation of that service request, the Party receiving the request shall determine whether the other Parties are potentially impacted as described in this section. If the other Parties are potentially impacted, the Party receiving the request shall notify the Affected System and convey the information provided in the posting. The Direct Connect System shall notify the potentially impacted system(s) a. While performing the analysis of the transmission service request, the Party receiving the request identifies the potential for an adverse condition on another Party’s transmission system through one or both of the following tests: (i) Thermal powerflow analysis and Associated Criteria: A contingency list for the Affected System and Direct Connect System shall be agreed upon by the Party for the Direct Connect System and the Party for the adjacent Affected System. Contingencies on both the Affected System and on the Direct Connect system are analyzed. Identify thermal loadings determined to: (1) have a pre and/or post- contingency loading of over 100% of the applicable rating in the modeling software on a monitored facility of 69 kV or above; and (2) flow increases by 3% or more on the same monitored facility. (ii) PTDF Screen and Associated Criteria (DFAX screen under system intact conditions): When the Direct Connect System: (1) is PJM and identifies a customer’s request having a 3% or greater PTDF on any monitored transmission facility 69 kV or above of another Party; (2) is TVA and identifies a customer’s re...
Sample 1
Analysis of Long Term Firm Transmission Service Requests. Ve Section 9.3.5.1 Preparation of Coordinated System Plan. Version: 0.0.0 Effect Section 9.3.5.2 Coordinated System Plan Steps. Version: 0.0.0 Effective: 3/25/ Section 9.4 Allocation of Costs of Network Upgrades. Version: 0.0.0 Effective Section 9.4.1 Network Upgrades Associated with Interconnections. Version: 0 Section 9.4.2 Network Upgrades Associated with Transmission Service... Ver
Sample 1

Related to Analysis of Long Term Firm Transmission Service Requests

  • Service Requests In support of services outlined in this Agreement, the Service Provider will respond to service related incidents and/or requests submitted by the Customer within the following time frames:

  • Transmission Delivery Service Implications Under ER Interconnection Service, Interconnection Customer will be eligible to inject power from the Generating Facility into and deliver power across the Transmission System on an “as available” basis up to the amount of MW identified in the applicable stability and steady state studies to the extent the upgrades initially required to qualify for ER Interconnection Service have been constructed. After that date FERC makes effective MISO’s Energy Market Tariff filed in Docket No. ER04-691-000, Interconnection Customer may place a bid to sell into the market up to the maximum identified Generating Facility output, subject to any conditions specified in the Interconnection Service approval, and the Generating Facility will be dispatched to the extent the Interconnection Customer’s bid clears. In all other instances, no transmission or other delivery service from the Generating Facility is assured, but Interconnection Customer may obtain Point-To-Point Transmission Service, Network Integration Transmission Service or be used for secondary network transmission service, pursuant to the Tariff, up to the maximum output identified in the stability and steady state studies. In those instances, in order for Interconnection Customer to obtain the right to deliver or inject energy beyond the Point of Interconnection or to improve its ability to do so, transmission delivery service must be obtained pursuant to the provisions of the Tariff. The Interconnection Customer’s ability to inject its Generating Facility output beyond the Point of Interconnection, therefore, will depend on the existing capacity of the Transmission or Distribution System as applicable, at such time as a Transmission Service request is made that would accommodate such delivery. The provision of Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service or Network Integration Transmission Service may require the construction of additional Network or Distribution Upgrades.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information.

  • Interconnection Service Interconnection Service allows the Interconnection Customer to connect the Large Generating Facility to the Participating TO’s Transmission System and be eligible to deliver the Large Generating Facility’s output using the available capacity of the CAISO Controlled Grid. To the extent the Interconnection Customer wants to receive Interconnection Service, the Participating TO shall construct facilities identified in Appendices A and C that the Participating TO is responsible to construct.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will xxxx Xxxxxxx Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

  • Information Submission by Connecting Transmission Owner The initial information submission by Connecting Transmission Owner shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to Trial Operation and shall include New York State Transmission System information necessary to allow the Developer to select equipment and meet any system protection and stability requirements, unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner. On a monthly basis Connecting Transmission Owner shall provide Developer and NYISO a status report on the construction and installation of Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades, including, but not limited to, the following information: (1) progress to date; (2) a description of the activities since the last report; (3) a description of the action items for the next period; and (4) the delivery status of equipment ordered.

  • Interconnection Request This Section 3 shall not apply to any proposed modifications by Interconnection Customer to its facilities for which Interconnection Customer must make an Interconnection Request under the Tariff. In such circumstances, the Interconnection Customer and Transmission Provider shall follow the requirements of Subpart A of Part IV of the Tariff.

  • No Transmission Delivery Service The execution of this Agreement does not constitute a request for, nor agreement to provide, any Transmission Service under the NYISO OATT, and does not convey any right to deliver electricity to any specific customer or Point of Delivery. If Developer wishes to obtain Transmission Service on the New York State Transmission System, then Developer must request such Transmission Service in accordance with the provisions of the NYISO OATT.

  • Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities described in Appendix A hereto, at the sole expense of the Developer.

  • NETWORK INTERCONNECTION METHODS 3.1 The Interconnection provided herein may not be used solely for the purpose of originating a Party’s own interexchange traffic.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!