We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Study Process Sample Clauses

Study Process. The Replacement Request will consist of an environmental study as set forth in Section 15.6.1 and may consist of three additional studies: (1) System impact study for the Replacement Request (Replacement Impact Study) as set forth in Section 15.6.2, (2) Reliability Assessment Study for the Replacement Request (Reliability Assessment) as set forth in Section 15.6.3, and (3) Facilities Study for the Replacement Request (Replacement Facilities Study) as set forth in Section 15.6.4.
Study ProcessCapitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings specified in the Glossary of Terms in Attachment 1 or the body of these procedures.
Study Process. Repower Requests will consist of an environmental study as set forth in Section 14.5.1 and may consist of two additional studies: (1) A system impact study for the Repower Request (Repower Impact Study) as set forth in Section 14.5.2, and (2) a Facilities Study for the Repower Request (Repower Facilities Study) as set forth in Section 14.5.3.
Study Process. Deposit Change in Ownership Legal Name of the Interconnection Member (or, if an individual, individual’s name) Alternative Contact Information (if different from the Interconnection Member)
Study Process. 1.2.1.1 PlanD commissioned Xxx Xxxx and Partners Hong Kong Limited (the Consultant) on 5 March 2018 to undertake the “Development of a Common Spatial Data Infrastructure – Built Environment Application PlatformFeasibility Study” (the Study). The assignment comprises two study stages. Stage 1 is the study and formulation of a development framework and Stage 2 is the development of a test case for BEAP. 1.2.1.2 Key tasks for Stage 1 include: a) conducting a desktop review of built environment application platforms and systems implemented or being implemented by other international smart cities, governments and agencies, and/or public service operators that are related to city planning, infrastructure/engineering development and the environment; and b) formulating an overall CSDI BEAP framework with goals and targets as a roadmap covering short, medium and long terms for the gradual implementation of CSDI and smart city initiatives, identifying potential built- environment related applications, formulating BEAP development plans with objectives, scope, applications, technology development, and implementing and phasing to enable the gradual implementation of the BEAP in short, medium and long terms. 1.2.1.3 The conceptual model of BEAP was developed in the course of formulating the overall CSDI BEAP framework based on the four building blocks and corresponding principles as derived based on the findings from the Desktop Review and stakeholder involvement. Based on departmental visits to B/Ds, selection and prioritization criteria and subsequent synergy workshop and stakeholders’ engagement meeting, potential application types were then identified for further investigation and development. 1.2.1.4 Stage 2 formulated and established a test case for the future development of the BEAP to demonstrate that the identified applications could be applied to support work of B/Ds through proof of concept and demonstrate the feasibility through prototyping of applications for the future development and implementation of the BEAP.
Study Process. 7. The internal quality control system of the higher education institution includes quality assurance aspects related to the provision of quality study process, including study programmes for foreigners. 8. Proportion of higher education institution lecturers working in study programmes with B2 and C1 levels of English (separately). 9. The higher education institution provides English language training for local lecturers. 10. The higher education institution educates academic, administrative and technical staff about cultural differences and intercultural communication.
Study ProcessTransmission Provider will support the NTTG processes as a member of NTTG to establish a coordinated sub-regional study process, involving both economic and reliability components, as outlined in the NTTG planning committee charter, which is approved by the NTTG Steering Committee. The “NTTG Planning Committee Charter” is available in Section “2.D – NTTG Charters & Agreements” of the Transmission Provider’s business practice, available on the Transmission Provider’s OASIS at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/NWMT/NWMTdocs/Attachment_K_Business_Practice_L inks.doc. As part of the sub-regional study process, the planning committee will biennially prepare a long-term (10 year) bulk transmission expansion plan, while taking into consideration up to a twenty year planning horizon. The comprehensive transmission planning process will include, but not be limited to, the following milestone activities during an eight (8) quarter study cycle as outlined below:
Study Process. The procedure for evaluating an Interconnection Request that includes the Section 4 scoping meeting, system impact study, and facilities study. The Study process may be a serial Study Process or a Cluster Study process, as applicable. ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 November 17 4:39 PM - SCPSC - Docket # 2019-326-E - Page 38 of 196 DEC/DEP Application - Attachment 1 Docket No. 2019-326-E Upgrades – The required additions and modifications to the Utility's System at or beyond the Point of Interconnection. Upgrades may be Network Upgrades or Distribution Upgrades, and “System Upgrades” include both Network Upgrades or Distribution Upgrades. Upgrades do not include Interconnection Facilities. ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 November 17 4:39 PM - SCPSC - Docket # 2019-326-E - Page 39 of 196 DEC/DEP Application - Attachment 1 Docket No. 2019-326-E Preamble and Instructions An Interconnection Customer who requests a Pre-Application Report must submit this Pre-Application Request by hand delivery, mail, e-mail, or fax to the Utility along with the non-refundable fee of $500.
Study Process. 4.1 Applicability The Study Process shall be used by an Interconnection Customer proposing to interconnect its Generating Facility with the Utility's System if the Generating Facility exceeds the size limits for the Section 3 Fast Track Process, is not certified, or is certified but did not pass the Fast Track Process or the 20 kW Inverter Process. The Interconnection Customer may be required to submit additional documentation, as may be requested by the Utility in writing, during the Study Process. Any changes to the study process desired by a Utility shall first be approved by the Commission before its implementation. In the interim period, the Utility shall continue to effectuate the studies without delay. delay “good utility practice” guidelines consistent with previous practice without . follows Duke Energy (WG1) proposed rewriting section 4.1 as . Commented [A70]: December Comment from GGE US: We believe fact based decision making (technical and economic) to introduction of new technical parameters and/or good utility practices should both be discussed and aligned with broad stakeholder input. EX. DSDR LVR policy as it relates to degradation and economic benefits to ratepayers. Commented [A71]: Comment: Requires an IC to provide information or to establish binding response times during the study process. Reasonable timeframes for ICs to produce information requested by the utility along with an opportunity to request an extension/cure. Tolling the study timelines. There is not currently a clear procedure for the utility to require an IC to provide information or to establish binding response times during the study process, which have been increasingly necessary as new study standards have resulted in customer decision points within SIS as well as additional requests for project details and data to complete more Furthermore, any changes in the Utility’s application of “good utility practice” and/or technical parameters shall also first be approved by the Commission before its implementation. In the interim period, the Utility shall continue to use the existing
Study Process. The procedure for evaluating an Interconnection Request that includes the section 3 scoping meeting, feasibility study, system impact study, and facilities study. Transmission OwnerThe entity that owns, leases or otherwise possesses an interest in the portion of the Transmission System at the Point of Interconnection and may be a Party to the Small Generator Interconnection Agreement to the extent necessary. Transmission Provider – The public utility (or its designated agent) that owns, controls, or operates transmission or distribution facilities used for the transmission of electricity in interstate commerce and provides transmission service under the Tariff. The term Transmission Provider should be read to include the Transmission Owner when the Transmission Owner is separate from the Transmission Provider. Transmission System – The facilities owned, controlled or operated by the Transmission Provider or the Transmission Owner that are used to provide transmission service under the Tariff. Upgrades – The required additions and modifications to the Transmission Provider’s Transmission System at or beyond the Point of Interconnection. Upgrades may be Network Upgrades or Distribution Upgrades. Upgrades do not include Interconnection Facilities. Transmission Provider: