Study Process. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings specified in the Glossary of Terms in Attachment 1 or the body of these procedures.
Study Process. The Replacement Request will consist of an environmental study as set forth in Section 15.6.1 and may consist of three additional studies: (1) System impact study for the Replacement Request (Replacement Impact Study) as set forth in Section 15.6.2, (2) Reliability Assessment Study for the Replacement Request (Reliability Assessment) as set forth in Section 15.6.3, and (3) Facilities Study for the Replacement Request (Replacement Facilities Study) as set forth in Section 15.6.4.
Study Process. Repower Requests will consist of an environmental study as set forth in Section 14.5.1 and may consist of two additional studies: (1) A system impact study for the Repower Request (Repower Impact Study) as set forth in Section 14.5.2, and (2) a Facilities Study for the Repower Request (Repower Facilities Study) as set forth in Section 14.5.3.
Study Process. Deposit Change in Ownership Legal Name of the Interconnection Member (or, if an individual, individual’s name) Alternative Contact Information (if different from the Interconnection Member)
Study Process. 4.1 Applicability The Study Process shall be used by an Interconnection Customer proposing to interconnect its Generating Facility with the Utility's System if the Generating Facility exceeds the size limits for the Section 3 Fast Track Process, is not certified, or is certified but did not pass the Fast Track Process or the 20 kW Inverter Process. The Interconnection Customer may be required to submit additional documentation, as may be requested by the Utility in writing, during the Study Process. Any changes to the study process desired by a Utility shall first be approved by the Commission before its implementation. In the interim period, the Utility shall continue to effectuate the studies without delay. delay “good utility practice” guidelines consistent with previous practice without . follows Duke Energy (WG1) proposed rewriting section 4.1 as . Commented [A70]: December Comment from GGE US: We believe fact based decision making (technical and economic) to introduction of new technical parameters and/or good utility practices should both be discussed and aligned with broad stakeholder input. EX. DSDR LVR policy as it relates to degradation and economic benefits to ratepayers. Commented [A71]: Comment: Requires an IC to provide information or to establish binding response times during the study process. Reasonable timeframes for ICs to produce information requested by the utility along with an opportunity to request an extension/cure. Tolling the study timelines. There is not currently a clear procedure for the utility to require an IC to provide information or to establish binding response times during the study process, which have been increasingly necessary as new study standards have resulted in customer decision points within SIS as well as additional requests for project details and data to complete more Furthermore, any changes in the Utility’s application of “good utility practice” and/or technical parameters shall also first be approved by the Commission before its implementation. In the interim period, the Utility shall continue to use the existing
Study Process. 1.2.1.1 PlanD commissioned Xxx Xxxx and Partners Hong Kong Limited (the Consultant) on 5 March 2018 to undertake the “Development of a Common Spatial Data Infrastructure – Built Environment Application Platform – Feasibility Study” (the Study). The assignment comprises two study stages. Stage 1 is the study and formulation of a development framework and Stage 2 is the development of a test case for BEAP.
1.2.1.2 Key tasks for Stage 1 include:
a) conducting a desktop review of built environment application platforms and systems implemented or being implemented by other international smart cities, governments and agencies, and/or public service operators that are related to city planning, infrastructure/engineering development and the environment; and
b) formulating an overall CSDI BEAP framework with goals and targets as a roadmap covering short, medium and long terms for the gradual implementation of CSDI and smart city initiatives, identifying potential built- environment related applications, formulating BEAP development plans with objectives, scope, applications, technology development, and implementing and phasing to enable the gradual implementation of the BEAP in short, medium and long terms.
1.2.1.3 The conceptual model of BEAP was developed in the course of formulating the overall CSDI BEAP framework based on the four building blocks and corresponding principles as derived based on the findings from the Desktop Review and stakeholder involvement. Based on departmental visits to B/Ds, selection and prioritization criteria and subsequent synergy workshop and stakeholders’ engagement meeting, potential application types were then identified for further investigation and development.
1.2.1.4 Stage 2 formulated and established a test case for the future development of the BEAP to demonstrate that the identified applications could be applied to support work of B/Ds through proof of concept and demonstrate the feasibility through prototyping of applications for the future development and implementation of the BEAP.
Study Process. 3.1 Applicability The Study Process shall be used by an Interconnection Customer proposing to interconnect its Small Generating Facility with the Transmission Provider's Transmission System if the Small Generating Facility (1) is larger than 2 MW but no larger than 20 MW, (2) is not certified, or (3) is certified but did not pass the Fast Track Process or the 10 kW Inverter Process.
Study Process. The Study Process shall be subject to the requirements of the applicable Transmission System owner, and may require special metering and other equipment as required by the Transmission System owner on a case by case basis as determined by the Study Process.
Study Process. 4.1 Applicability
Study Process. The procedure for evaluating an Interconnection Request that includes the Section 4 scoping meeting, system impact study, and facilities study. The Study process may be a serial Study process or a Cluster Study process, as applicable.
