Classification Review and Appeals Sample Clauses

Classification Review and Appeals. An employee dissatisfied with the classification their position will first discuss the matter with their immediate supervisor. This is the beginning of the informal review process. If the supervisor is unable to resolve the issue to the employee's satisfaction, the supervisor will arrange for the employee to discuss their dissatisfaction with an appropriate staff member of the servicing HRO. An employee, upon request, will have access to pertinent information directly related to the classification of their position. This informal classification review process will be normally be completed within a reasonable period. If the employee still believes there is an error they may file an appeal in accordance with applicable DOD and/or OPM regulations. a. When an employee notifies the Activity that they wish to file an appeal regarding job title, series, or grade, they shall be furnished information on appeal rights and procedures under applicable regulations. An employee may elect to be represented by the Local Union when appealing and when discussing appeal rights and procedures with the Human Resources Office. Such Local representative will be on official time while assisting with the appeal process, if otherwise in a duty status. b. Employees who file a classification or job grading appeal will be provided a copy of all documentation entered into the case file by the servicing Human Resources Office.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Review and Appeals. An employee dissatisfied with the classification their position will first discuss the matter with their immediate supervisor. This is the beginning of the informal review process. If the supervisor is unable to resolve the issue to the employee's satisfaction, the supervisor will arrange for the employee to discuss their dissatisfaction with an appropriate staff member of the servicing HRO. An employee, upon request, will have access to pertinent information directly related to the classification of their position. This informal classification review process will normally be completed within a reasonable period of time. If the employee still believes there is an error they may file an appeal in accordance with applicable DOD and/or OPM regulations. a. Before an employee files an appeal there must be a written agreement between the employee and supervisor that the content, not necessarily the title, series or grade, of the position/job description is current and accurate. Appeals where this agreement has not been reached will not be accepted. b. When an employee notifies the Activity that they wish to file an appeal regarding job title, series, or grade, they shall be furnished information on appeal rights and procedures under applicable regulations. An employee may elect to be represented by the Local Union when appealing and when discussing appeal rights and procedures with the Human Resources Office. Such Local representative will be on official time while assisting with the appeal process, if otherwise in a duty status. c. Employees who file a classification or job grading appeal will be provided a copy of all documentation entered into the case file by the servicing Human Resources Office.
Classification Review and Appeals a. Any BUE dissatisfied with the classification of their position will first discuss the matter with their immediate supervisor. The BUE may elect to be represented by the Union for this discussion. This is the beginning of the informal review process. If the supervisor is unable to resolve the issue to the BUE’s satisfaction, the supervisor will, at the BUE and/or the Union’s request, arrange for the BUE to discuss their dissatisfaction with the appropriate Human Resources staff member(s). A BUE, upon request, will have access to pertinent information directly related to the classification of their position. If the BUE believes, after discussing with the appropriate Human Resources staff member(s) that there is an error, they may file an appeal to the Employer or OPM as appropriate. b. When a BUE notifies the Activity that they wish to file an appeal regarding job title, series, or grade, they shall be furnished, upon request, information on appeal rights and procedures in applicable regulations. A BUE may elect to be represented by the Union when appealing and when discussing appeal rights and procedures with the Human Resources Office. c. Classification reviews and job grading appeals will be submitted and processed in accordance with applicable regulations. d. The effective date of a personnel action directed by an appeal decision shall be as prescribed in applicable regulations unless otherwise specified by OPM.
Classification Review and Appeals. An employee dissatisfied with the classification of his or her position will first discuss the matter with his or her immediate supervisor. This is the beginning of the informal review process. If the supervisor is unable to resolve the issue to the employee's satisfaction, the supervisor will, arrange for the employee to discuss his or her dissatisfaction with the appropriate human resources staff members. An employee, upon request, will have access to pertinent information directly related to the classification of his/her position. This informal classification review process will normally be completed within a reasonable period of time. If the employee still believes there is an error he or she may file an appeal to the Department of Defense (DoD) or Office of Personnel Management (OPM), as appropriate; however, there must be a written agreement between the employee and supervisor that the content, not necessarily the title, series or grade, of the position/job description is current and accurate. Appeals where this agreement has not been reached will not be accepted. a. When an employee notifies the Activity that he/she wishes to file an appeal regarding job title, series, or grade, he/she shall be furnished, information on appeal rights and procedures under applicable regulations. An employee may elect to be represented by the Local Union when appealing and when discussing appeal rights and procedures with the Human Resources Office. Such Local representative will be on official time while assisting with the appeal process, if otherwise in a duty status. b. Classification reviews and job-grading appeals will be submitted and processed in accordance with applicable DoD and/or OPM regulations. A Federal Wage System employee cannot file an appeal to OPM until they first appeal to DoD. c. Employees who file a classification or job grading appeal with the DoD will be provided a copy of all documentation entered into the case file by the servicing Human Resources Office. An employee who files a classification appeal with OPM will be furnished a copy of that information which OPM requires as part of an appeal and which is not readily available to the employee.

Related to Classification Review and Appeals

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Grievance and Appeals Unit See Section 9 for contact information. You may also contact the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner’s Consumer Resource Program, RIREACH at 1-855-747-3224 about questions or concerns you may have. A complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction with any aspect of our operation or the quality of care you received from a healthcare provider. A complaint is not an appeal. For information about submitting an appeal, please see the Reconsiderations and Appeals section below. We encourage you to discuss any concerns or issues you may have about any aspect of your medical treatment with the healthcare provider that furnished the care. In most cases, issues can be more easily resolved if they are raised when they occur. However, if you remain dissatisfied or prefer not to take up the issue with your provider, you can call our Customer Service Department for further assistance. You may also call our Customer Service Department if you are dissatisfied with any aspect of our operation. If the concern or issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you may file a verbal or written complaint with our Grievance and Appeals Unit. We will acknowledge receipt of your complaint or administrative appeal within ten (10) business days. The Grievance and Appeals Unit will conduct a thorough review of your complaint and respond within thirty (30) calendar days of the date it was received. The determination letter will provide you with the rationale for our response as well as information on any possible next steps available to you. When filing a complaint, please provide the following information: • your name, address, member ID number; • the date of the incident or service; • summary of the issue; • any previous contact with BCBSRI concerning the issue; • a brief description of the relief or solution you are seeking; and • additional information such as referral forms, claims, or any other documentation that you would like us to review. Please send all information to the address listed on the Contact Information section.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Good Shepherd was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether: a. Good Shepherd cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30-day period, but that, during the 30-day period following Good Shepherd’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: (i) Good Shepherd had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) Good Shepherd pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) Good Shepherd provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach. For purposes of the exclusion herein, exclusion shall take effect only after an ALJ decision favorable to OIG, or, if the ALJ rules for Good Shepherd, only after a DAB decision in favor of OIG. Good Shepherd’s election of its contractual right to appeal to the DAB shall not abrogate OIG’s authority to exclude Good Shepherd upon the issuance of an ALJ’s decision in favor of OIG. If the ALJ sustains the determination of OIG and determines that exclusion is authorized, such exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues such a decision, notwithstanding that Good Shepherd may request review of the ALJ decision by the DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Good Shepherd shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Good Shepherd, Good Shepherd shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.

  • Review and Approval The Supplier confirms and agrees that it shall apply to receive ISR's written consent, wherever ISR's consent, explicitly or implied, is required according to this Agreement. This requirement and the provision of ISR consent, shall not derogate in any way from Supplier's responsibilities and liabilities under this Agreement, and ISR shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the review (whether or not there are objections) and/or with any approval given to, or denied from, Supplier, with respect to any matter and/or document, including but without limitation, drawings, designs (at all phases), plans, tests or otherwise.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!