Consensus Meeting Sample Clauses

Consensus Meeting. Prior to the end of the fourteenth (14th) week, the evaluation team shall meet to review all documents and prepare the Evaluation Report.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consensus Meeting. The Short List of Pre-Selected Applicants proposals will pass to the Consensus Meeting (estimated up to 55). The Consensus meeting will be attended by the Internal Committee composed by FBOX, CTAG, ISDI, CLUSTERS and Corporates. During the Consensus Meeting the ‘Internal Committee’ will decide the best proposals per challenge based on the external evaluation results and taking into account the selection criteria specified below: ● Team. ● Business. ● Strategic Fit. Transversal criteria: ‘Environment and low carbon economy contribution’, ‘Equal Opportunities’ and ‘Social Impact’ will be considered in the final decision for instance: in case of a tie, projects with a female in the position of CEO, CFO or CTO will be prioritised to those without women or having women but not in management positions. During the Consensus Meeting the <IMPACT> Connected Car Selection Team partners, by consensus, will decide the best proposals per vertical, that will be invited to the ‘Disruptors Boot Camp’ (see following points f, g and h). The selection will be based on the external evaluation results and taking into account the selection criteria specified above, namely considering those proposals that show a significant strategic fit with partners’ activities, and where <IMPACT> Connected Car partners believe they can add the most value during the acceleration process. Some applicants may be invited to an interview during the Consensus Meeting (by default it will be a web interview) when necessary to acquire essential information to take an informed decision. After this step, the final ranking will be computed. Outputs: List of up to 40 Finalists and 15 applicants in reserve list (Total = 55) Communication to participants: Individual online communication will be sent to all evaluated proposals. Additional information about next steps will be also sent to the List of Beneficiaries which will be asked to send further information about their projects.
Consensus Meeting. Prior to January 29, 2021, the evaluation team shall meet to review all documents and prepare the Evaluation Report. Changes dates to meet new calendar.
Consensus Meeting. At the end of the gaps and advances phase, the Executive Board will hold a consensus meeting to review and discuss the results obtained on the gaps and advances in each area of knowledge, taking into account the comments of all relevant parties, to finally integrate all the information into one single official report (D11.2) that will be submitted to the EC.
Consensus Meeting. The main goal of this consensus meeting is to review the results in research priorities, taking into account the comments of the Scientific AB, the stakeholder AB, and the government and funding institution council, and to generate one single official report (D11.3) that will be submitted to the EC, and the draft of the roadmaps (more methodological details in section 5.3.6).
Consensus Meeting. The ‘Open Call Selection Committee’ formed by selected consortium partners and two independent Experts, will decide by Consensus (or ⅔ majority votes) the ‘List of finalists’ to pass to the next phase (between 10 and 15 applicants based on the quality of the proposals) and the ‘Reserve List’. The discussion will be based on the ranking obtained as a result of the Independent Evaluation. Whilst normally the highest ranked proposals will be selected for funding, the Open Call Selection Committee might have fair reasons for objecting to a specific third party, like the alignment with the goals and scope of XXXX, the ability to achieve the highest impact possible, commercial competition, as well as the existence of significant ethical concerns or a potential conflict of interest etc. In this case, the choice may pass to the next-ranked proposal. The exact number of proposals approved will be decided based on the overall quality of the proposals.
Consensus Meeting. The first version of the CARE-AAT Guideline was discussed in a consensus meeting. In addition to the CARE-AAT group, three other experts participated (two art therapists/researchers, one Dutch and one German, and one epidemiologist). The list was discussed per item during this meeting, after which full consensus was achieved. One item was added as a separate item: Treatment Objectives and Plan. Experts stated that this should be a separate item, because this is an important step in the art therapy process that precedes the Therapeutic Intervention. The additions to Therapeutic Intervention were found to be too extensive and were shortened. Nevertheless, all experts agreed that the intervention should be well described and substantiated. The underpinning of the treatment plan was found an important addition, because in case reports, AATs do not make clear why they choose a specific treatment direction and where these choices are based on. Therapist self-reflection (e.g., observations of own actions and own attitude, reflection on the interaction with the client, intuitive moments) was not present in the draft version of the guideline. Since it is an important item in AAT practice, the expert group suggested this to be incorporated in the CARE-AAT guideline. Reflection is done after each session and also on the therapeutic process as a whole. The therapeutic relationship is an important factor in healthcare (Born, 2006). Reflection on these aspects is essential in the ongoing professionalization of the therapist. It is important to include the reflection item in this guideline, because this can provide more insight in the clinical reasoning of the therapist, in the decision moments and the way AATs work. This can provide explicit information about the therapy. The therapist’s self-reflection was classified under the item Discussion, because in this item, one can reflect on the case and can point out strengths and weaknesses of professional intervention. The items that remained unchanged are: Title, Keywords, Abstract, Timeline, Client or Patient Perspective and Informed Consent (Table I). Final version After the changes made during the meeting, the CARE-AAT Guideline was accepted with minor revisions, through e-mail contact with the participants of the consensus meeting. The CARE- AAT Guideline is presented in Table I. Table I. CARE Guidelines Items and AAT Specific Adaptations: CARE-AAT Guideline CARE ITEM CARE GUIDELINESS SECTION DESCRIPTION ANTHROPOSOPHIC...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consensus Meeting. The Short List of Pre-Selected Applicants proposals will pass to the Consensus Meeting (estimated up to 40). The Consensus meeting will be attended by the Internal Committee composed by FBOX, CTAG, ISDI, CLUSTERS and Corporates. During the Consensus Meeting the ‘Internal Committee’ will decide the best proposals per challenge based on the external evaluation results and taking into account the selection criteria specified below: • Team. • Business. • Strategic Fit.

Related to Consensus Meeting

  • Final Meeting The goal of this subtask is to complete the closeout of this Agreement. The Recipient shall: • Meet with Energy Commission staff to present project findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The final meeting must be completed during the closeout of this Agreement. This meeting will be attended by the Recipient and CAM, at a minimum. The meeting may occur in person or by electronic conferencing (e.g., WebEx), with approval of the CAM. The technical and administrative aspects of Agreement closeout will be discussed at the meeting, which may be divided into two separate meetings at the CAM’s discretion. o The technical portion of the meeting will involve the presentation of findings, conclusions, and recommended next steps (if any) for the Agreement. The CAM will determine the appropriate meeting participants. o The administrative portion of the meeting will involve a discussion with the CAM and the CAO of the following Agreement closeout items:  Disposition of any state-owned equipment.  Need to file a Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement (Form UCC-1) regarding the Energy Commission’s interest in patented technology.  The Energy Commission’s request for specific “generated” data (not already provided in Agreement products).  Need to document the Recipient’s disclosure of “subject inventions” developed under the Agreement.  “Surviving” Agreement provisions such as repayment provisions and confidential products.  Final invoicing and release of retention. • Prepare a Final Meeting Agreement Summary that documents any agreement made between the Recipient and Commission staff during the meeting.

  • Informal Meeting Before a formal hearing is conducted the University President or designee shall call a meeting with the charging party, the accused Bargaining Unit Faculty Member, and a representative of the AAUP-WSU. The purpose of this meeting shall be to attempt resolution of the matter through informal discussion. Additional meetings may occur provided the University President or designee and the Bargaining Unit Faculty Member being charged believe that further meetings will serve a useful purpose.

  • Scoping Meeting 4.2.1 A scoping meeting will be held within ten (10) Business Days after the Interconnection Request is deemed complete, or as otherwise mutually agreed to by the Parties. The Utility and the Interconnection Customer will bring to the meeting personnel, including system engineers and other resources as may be reasonably required to accomplish the purpose of the meeting. The scoping meeting may be omitted by mutual agreement in writing.

  • Grievance Meeting An employee shall present a signed grievance in writing to the College President or his/her designee setting forth the nature of the grievance, the surrounding circumstances and the remedy sought. The College President or his/her designee shall arrange a meeting within 15 days of the receipt of the grievance at which the employee, a Union Xxxxxxx, and an additional representative designated by the Union Local shall be present if requested by the employee, the Union Local or the College. The College President or his/her designee may have such persons or counsel attend as the College President or his/her designee deems necessary.

  • Meeting A copy of the decision shall be sent to the grievant and to the UFF grievance representative if the grievant elected self-representation or representation by legal counsel.

  • Review Meeting i. Either the BCTF or BCPSEA may request in writing a meeting to review the issues in a provincial matters grievance that has been referred to arbitration.

  • Orientation Meeting Within thirty (30) calendar days from execution of the Contract, Vendor and Order Fulfillers will be required to attend an orientation meeting to discuss the content and procedures of the Contract to include reporting requirements. DIR, at its discretion, may waive the orientation requirement for Vendors who have previously held DIR contracts. The meeting will be held in the Austin, Texas area at a date and time mutually acceptable to DIR and the Vendor or by teleconference, at DIR’s discretion. DIR shall bear no cost for the time and travel of the Vendor or Order Fulfillers for attendance at the meeting.

  • Meeting of Committee In the event of either party wishing to call a meeting of the Committee, the meeting shall be held at a time and place fixed by mutual agreement, however, such meeting to be held not later than 14 days after request has been received unless varied by mutual agreement.

  • Disciplinary Meeting Supervisors shall give employees a forty-eight (48) hour notice, whenever possible, of planned disciplinary meetings. If the Xxxxxxx and the employee agree, the disciplin- ary meeting can be held less than forty-eight (48) hours after notification, but the Xxxxxxx or employee cannot refuse to hold an immediate meeting if circumstances require it. Supervisors shall give employees the opportunity to have a Union Xxxxxxx present for an oral warning, a written warning, a notice of suspension, or a notice of discharge. Employees will be given an opportunity to hear the evidence and respond to the evidence supporting suspension or discharge while still in pay status. Non- supervisory co-workers, other than a Union Xxxxxxx of the employee's choice, shall not be present in another employee's disciplinary meeting. In cases of immediate suspension or discharge, the supervisor will meet with the Xxxxxxx and employee prior to the employee being required to leave the facility. However, neither the refusal of the Union Xxxxxxx to participate nor their unavailability shall abridge the Employer's right to take disciplinary action.

  • Meeting Agenda 6.1 The Co-chairpersons will prepare an agenda and forward a copy of the agenda to all Joint Committee members at least one week in advance of the meeting (sample attached).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.