Contents of Request Sample Clauses

Contents of Request. Such request must be in writing and must include the reasons for alleging that the position is improperly classified, i.e., change in assigned duties, level of complexity of work, independence of action, etc. Where no agreement is reached between the employee and the supervisor as to the accuracy of the position description, the employee may submit a copy of the signed position description of record along with a list of the duties and/or Factor Evaluation System factors which the employee considers inaccurate or not included in the position description of record.

Contents of Request. To seek authority for a temporary reas- signment of personnel under paragraph (1), the Governor of a State or a tribal organiza- tion shall submit to the Secretary a request for such reassignment flexibility and shall include in the request each of the following: (i) An assurance that the public health emergency in the geographic area of the requesting State or Indian tribe cannot be adequately and appropriately addressed by the public health workforce otherwise available. (ii) An assurance that the public health emergency would be addressed more effi- ciently and effectively through the re- quested temporary reassignment of State and local personnel described in paragraph (1). (iii) An assurance that the requested temporary reassignment of personnel is consistent with any applicable All-Hazards Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan under section 247d–3a of this title. (iv) An identification of— (I) each Federal program from which personnel would be temporarily reas- signed pursuant to the requested author- ity; and (II) the number of personnel who would be so reassigned from each such pro- gram. (v) Such other information and assur- ances upon which the Secretary and Gov- ernor of a State or tribal organization agree.

Contents of Request. The employee’s request will contain the following: □ Current Class Title, Salary Range and Proposed Class Title and Salary Range. □ A listing of the additional duties acquired over a period of time that differs from the current job description. □ A statement from the employee’s supervisor indicating his/her recommendation for such reclassification.

Contents of Request. The Request for Exclusion must contain (i) a 7 reference to the name of the Action (Xxxxx, et al. v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.); (ii) the 8 full name, signature, and address of the person requesting to be excluded from the Class 9 Settlement; (iii) the words “Request for Exclusion” at the top of the document; and (iv) the 10 statement: “I wish to be excluded from the Settlement of this case.”

Contents of Request. A reclassification request shall contain the following information only: a. An unmodified current job description; and b. A complete list of new additional duties and the estimated amount of time spent daily performing each duty: and c. The current and proposed salary ranges; and d. Any other relevant information and data justifying the request.

Contents of Request. The request for referral shall be in the form of a motion, which shall state that the dispute is covered by an arbitration agreement. Apart from other submissions, the movant shall attach to his motion an authentic copy of the arbitration agreement. The request shall contain a notice of hearing addressed to all parties specifying the date and time when it would be heard. The party making the request shall serve it upon the respondent to give him the opportunity to file a comment or opposition as provided in the immediately succeeding Rule before the hearing. [Emphasis ours; italics original] 1. It reads: “[a] party to a pending action filed in violation of the arbitration agreement x x x may request the court to refer the parties to arbitration in accordance with such agreement.” In using the word “may” to qualify the act of filing a “request” under Section 24 of R.A. No. 9285, the Special ADR Rules clearly did not intend to limit the invocation of an arbitration agreement in a pending suit solely via such “request.” After all, non-compliance with an arbitration agreement is a valid defense to any offending suit and, as such, may even be raised in an answer as provided in our ordinary rules of procedure.95 In this case, it is conceded that petitioner was not able to file a separate “request” of arbitration before the MeTC. However, it is equally conceded that the petitioner, as early as in its Answer with Counterclaim, had already apprised the MeTC of the existence of the arbitration clause in the 2005 Lease Contract96 and, more significantly, of its desire to have the same enforced in this case.97 This act of petitioner is enough valid invocation of his right to arbitrate.