Continuance of Hearing Sample Clauses

Continuance of Hearing. The Court reserves the right to adjourn or continue the Final Approval Hearing and related deadlines without further written notice to the Settlement Class. If the Court alters any of those dates or times, the revised dates and times shall be posted on the website maintained by the Settlement Administrator.

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may adjourn, modify, or continue the Fairness Hearing without further direct notice to the Class Members, other than by notice via the Court’s docket or the Settlement Website.

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing in its discretion without direct notice to the Settlement Class, other than by notice to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, and any Class Member wishing to appear should check the Court’s docket or call the Clerk’s office three (3) calendar days before the scheduled date of the Fairness Hearing. DATED: , 2019 XXX. XXXXXX X. RUSSELL, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE XXXXXXXX X. XXXXX, et al.,

Continuance of Hearing. The hearing officer may continue the hearing either for convenience of the City or upon written application of the appellant, for a reasonable period from the receipt of request for extension. Written notice of the time and place of the hearing, and any continuance thereof, shall be provided to the appellant.

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may adjourn, modify, or continue the Fairness Hearing without further direct notice to the Class Members, other than by notice to Class Counsel. In such event, notice of the same shall be provided through the Settlement Website. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1. For purposes of this Final Approval Order and Judgment, except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement. 2. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the action and retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing and interpreting the Settlement Agreement. 3. The following Settlement Class is certified under Rule 23(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for purposes of the Settlement: All participants and beneficiaries of the NRECA 401(k) Pension Plan at any time from July 25, 2013 through July 31, 2020 excluding members of the Insurance and Financial Services Committee, NRECA’s Board of Directors, and the Plan Administrator. The Court finds that this Settlement Class meets all of the requirements of Rule 23(a) and 23(b)(1). 4. Pursuant to Rules 23(e)(1)(A) and (C), the Court hereby approves and confirms the Settlement and the terms therein as being fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Plan and the Class Members. 5. The Court hereby approves the Settlement and orders that the Settling Parties take all necessary steps to effectuate the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 6. In accordance with the Court’s Orders, and as reflected in the information from the Settlement Administrator (Analytics Consulting LLC), Settlement Notices were timely distributed by first-class mail to all Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort. The Settlement Administrator searched for updated address information for those returned as undeliverable, and re-mailed notices to those Class Members. In total, % were ultimately returned as undeliverable. In addition, pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1711, et seq., notice was provided to the Attorneys General for each of the states in which a Class Member resides and the Attorney General of the United States. 7. The form and methods of notifying the Class Members of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement Agreement met the requirements of Rules 23(c)(2) and (e), and due process...

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing in its discretion without direct notice to the Settlement Class, other than by notice to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, and any Class Member wishing to appear should check the Court’s docket or call the Clerk’s office three (3) calendar days before the scheduled date of the Fairness Hearing. DATED: , 2019 XXX. XXXXXXXXX X. EAGLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE XXXXX XXXXX, et al., Plaintiffs, XXXX UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. XXXXX XXXXX, et al., Plaintiffs,

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing in its discretion without direct notice to the Settlement Class, other than by notice to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, and any Class Member wishing to appear should check the Court’s docket or call the Clerk’s office three (3) calendar days before the scheduled date of the Fairness Hearing. DATED: , 2020 XXX. XXXXXXX X. PANNELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX et al., x. XXXXX UNIVERSITY et al., Civil Action No. 16-2920-CAP All persons who participated in the Emory University Retirement Plan and the Emory Healthcare, Inc. Retirement Savings and Matching Plan (the “Plans”) at any time during the Class Period, including any Beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in one or more of the Plans at any time during the Class Period, and any Alternate Payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in one or more of the Plan at any time during the Class Period. The Class Period is defined as August 11, 2010 through . For purposes of this Notice, if not defined herein, capitalized terms have the definitions in the Settlement Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice. SO ORDERED this day of , 2009. Xxx. Xxxxx X. Thompson, U.S.D.J. ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND CONFIRMING FINAL SETTLEMENT HEARING (SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION FOR XXXXXXX & CO LLC) 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx San Rafael, CA 94901 P: (000) 000-0000 F: (000) 000-0000 January 26, 2009 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP 0000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000 As background, Gilardi is the nation’s largest, private full-service administrator of class action settlements. For nearly a quarter-century, Gilardi has been the industry leader in class action settlement administration, with more than 3,000 cases administered and $12 billion in assets distributed. On an annual basis, we provide escrow agent services for over 900 Qualified Settlement Funds and manage assets in excess of $1.5 billion dollars. We are experts in all phases of legal administration and pride ourselves on our unmatched service, efficiency and accountability. Additionally, Gilardi has been consistently ranked #1 or #2 by the RiskMetrics Group as the “Most Frequent Claims Administrators in the Top 100 Settlements” in securities litigation ad has been a national contract holder with the FTC for nearly a quarter century, during which time we have administered all aspects of the FTC’s redress and distribution process.

Continuance of Hearing. The Court reserves the right to continue the Fairness Hearing without further written notice.

Continuance of Hearing. The Court will not continue the Fairness Hearing without a showing of good cause. However, the Court may adjourn or continue the Fairness Hearing without further direct notice to the Class Members, other than by notice to Class Counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED: You have been identified as a participant or beneficiary in your employer’s 401(k) retirement savings plan through which you were invested at relevant times in certain JPMorgan stable value funds. You could get a payment from this Class Action Settlement.