CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS Sample Clauses

CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. The designated Government representative is required to complete an Interagency Mobile Shower Facility Services Performance Evaluation Form (See Section J, Form 1276-F) prior to leaving each incident or prior to team transitions. The designated Government representative is required to distribute the completed copies of the evaluation as instructed on the form. (Do not send copies of the evaluation form to the Albuquerque Service Center). The form, in addition to other performance information which may become available, will be utilized to facilitate the Contractor’s annual performance report. The CO will provide the Contractor 30 calendar days to respond to any negative performance information received.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. CalRecycle will evaluate the Contractor’s performance within sixty days of the completion of this Agreement and shall remain on file by CalRecycle for a period of thirty-six months. If the Contractor does not satisfactorily perform the work or service specified in this Agreement, CalRecycle will submit a copy of the negative evaluation to the Department of General Services (DGS), Office of Legal Services, within five (5) working days of the completion of the evaluation. Upon filing an unsatisfactory evaluation with the DGS, CalRecycle shall notify and send a copy of the evaluation to the Contractor within fifteen days. The Contractor shall have thirty days to prepare and send a written response to CalRecycle and the DGS. CalRecycle and the DGS shall file the Contractor's statement with the evaluation. (PCC §10369).
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. For IT Services over $500,000, within sixty (60) days after the completion of the Contract, the Program Manager shall complete a written evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract. A copy of the STD 971 must be emailed to the State Department of Technology at and shall remain in the contract file for 36 months. If the Contractor did not satisfactorily perform the work, a copy of the evaluation form will be sent to the Contractor within fifteen (15) working days of the completion of the evaluation. (PCC 12102.3). You may view the form here: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxx/dgs/fmc/pdf/std971.pdf EXHIBIT B EDD Contract No. M53787-7100 Am 2 EDD/Deloitte Consulting LLP (STANDARD AGREEMENT) BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISION This Contract is valid and enforceable only if (1) sufficient funds are made available by the State Budget Act of the appropriate State Fiscal Year(s) covered by this Agreement for the purposes of this program; and (2) sufficient funds are made available to the State by the United States Government or by the State of California for the Fiscal Year(s) covered by this Contract for the purposes of this program. In addition, this Contract is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations or conditions established by the United States Government and/or the State of California, or any statute enacted by the Congress and Legislature, which may affect the provisions, terms or funding of the Contract in any manner. The parties mutually agree that if the Congress and/or Legislature does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall be amended to reflect any reduction in funds.
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. For IT Services over $500,000, within sixty (60) days after the completion of the Contract, the Program Manager shall complete a written evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract. A copy of the STD 971 must be emailed to the State Department of Technology at and shall remain in the contract file for 36 months. If the Contractor did not satisfactorily perform the work, a copy of the evaluation form will be sent to the Contractor within fifteen (15) working days of the completion of the evaluation. (PCC 12102.3). You may view the form here: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxx/dgs/fmc/pdf/std971.pdf
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. Pursuant to PCC Sections10367 and 10369, each contractor providing consultant services of $5,000 or more shall be advised in writing on the standard contract that the performance will be evaluated. One Contract/Contractor Evaluation, form STD 4, must be prepared within 60 days of the completion of the contract. The form shall be uploaded into FI$Cal and kept as part of the procurement file. The agency shall document the performance of the contractor in doing the work or in delivering the services for which the contract was awarded. The evaluations shall remain on file by the agency for a period of 36 months. If the contractor did not satisfactorily perform the work or service specified in the contract, the agency conducting the evaluation shall place one copy of the evaluation form in a separate agency contract file and send one copy of the form to DGS/OLS within five working days of the completion of the evaluation. (SCM Volume 1, section 3.02.5) On filing an unsatisfactory evaluation with DGS/OLS, the state agency shall notify and send a copy of the evaluation to the contractor within 15 days. The contractor shall have 30 days to prepare a statement defending his or her performance under the contract and to send it to the agency and the department. The contractor's statement shall be filed with the evaluation in the agency's separate contract file and in DGS/OLS's files. The evaluations and contractor responses on file with the agencies and DGS/OLS are not public records; they should be maintained in a separate file.

Related to CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!