Course Evaluation Sample Clauses

Course Evaluation. For every UW course, Teachers will assist in informing students about the online UW end-of- course evaluations, which are to be completed by students registered for UW credit. The evaluation results will be shared with the appropriate UW academic department and the Teacher.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Course Evaluation. An evaluation of the course after its completion may be required.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Course Evaluation. 8.1. The Facility must provide each Trainee with an opportunity to provide formative written feedback on the course and the instruction within the first 16 hours of the course, so that feedback may be used by the Trainer to adjust the course, as needed, to support the learning needs of the Trainees. 8.2. The Facility must provide each Trainee with an opportunity to anonymously evaluate the total course, and the instruction, so that feedback may be used by the Facility for continual improvement and/or to monitor customer satisfaction.
Sample 1
Course Evaluation. As a part of the final assessment each students make a written course evaluation and each study-group meet the assessment co-ordinator for an oral course evaluation. Pass or fail.
Sample 1
Course Evaluation. As part of a comprehensive teaching evaluation system, a Xxxx xxx develop, administer, and use appropriate student course/instructor evaluation forms, following consultation in committee. The Faculty Association and the University agree that student course/instructor evaluations are intended to solicit student learning experiences. These evaluations do not constitute unequivocal measures of teaching effectiveness, and may be affected by bias. These evaluations may only be used as part of a more comprehensive teaching evaluation system which may include other measures of student impact, peer evaluation, and reflective thought from the member. Such a system, if developed, shall be created in consultation with the academic staff members of the appropriate Faculty and included in the faculty Criteria Documents. When the information from student course/instructor evaluations is used, it will be in an aggregated or summarized form. Anonymous student comments gathered in the course/instructor evaluation process shall not be included in the aggregated or summarized forms. It is the member’s choice to provide students’ comments, but if they choose to do so, they must provide the complete set of students’ comments from the course. An academic staff member who does not wish to use the form which is in current use may make a written proposal to the Xxxx suggesting an alternative method of student course/instructor evaluation.
Sample 1
Course Evaluation. Course evaluation results shall now be available in electronic format only.
Sample 1
Course Evaluation. Peers or administrators with online or hybrid teaching expertise, appointed by the appropriate Xxxx, xxxx oversee development and evaluation of new online or hybrid classes in the first year of offering.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Course Evaluation. The results of any course evaluation are shared with the employee and placed on his files remain available electronically.
Sample 1
Course Evaluation. VAR shall survey all students upon completion of the course. Survey results will be shared with all Participant(s).
Sample 1

Related to Course Evaluation

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!