Course Evaluations Sample Clauses

Course Evaluations. 19.1.1 In order to improve course design or teaching effectiveness, a CAS Member may conduct a written evaluation of his/her teaching performance in his/her classes provided that the students consent to participate in the survey, and provided that the procedures of the survey protect student confidentiality.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Course Evaluations. In order to improve course design or teaching effectiveness, a Member may conduct a written evaluation of his/her teaching performance in his/her classes provided that the students consent to participate in the survey, and provided that the procedures of the survey protect student confidentiality.
Course Evaluations. If there is a documented concern about the quality of an eLearning course, the concern should be referred to the program faculty and the unit administrator.
Course Evaluations. All students must complete a course evaluation in class to receive credit for the course. These shall be sent electronically or mailed to RLI within 10 days of the course completion.
Course Evaluations. Graduate Workers shall have access to evaluations for the portion of courses for which they have primary responsibility (e.g. entire courses for instructors of record; lab sections; discussion sections). Graduate Workers shall not be entitled to course evaluations insofar as the evaluation is focused on the teaching or instruction undertaken by someone other than them. The University is in the process of implementing for Fall 2024 a new student information system which it expects will permit TAs and TFs to have access to the course evaluations for those sections/labs for which they are responsible. In the event that the new student information system is unable to meet that expectation, the matter will be referred to the JLMC for consideration of alternative means by which course evaluations or the relevant information can be shared with the TAs and TFs.
Course Evaluations. The approved evaluation tool is a valid and reliable standardized evaluation of instructor teaching effectiveness. a. The evaluation tool will be implemented through the VPSS (CAO) office. b. Each class regularly taught by an instructor will be surveyed at least once every three years with the evaluation schedule maintained by the VPSS (CAO). c. Each faculty member is to have at least one course evaluated each semester. d. Evaluations should be administered to students upon completion of at least 50% of the class but less than 75% of the class. The evaluations will be conducted either by a xxxxxxx or will be conducted in an on-line format. In either case, the instructor will not be present during the time of the evaluation to allow the students to respond freely to the instrument. e. Results of the evaluations will be made available to the faculty member, their direct supervisor, and/or VPSS (CAO) at the conclusion of the semester and will be discussed at the time of evaluation if possible.
Course Evaluations. Course evaluations will be administered for ESEs in teaching positions according to department practices. Results of the course evaluation process will be provided to the ESE within six (6) weeks of the University’s receipt of the completed evaluations.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Course Evaluations a. Course evaluations shall be conducted for all courses taught in the modality (at the time of the evaluation) chosen by the faculty and/or originally scheduled by the chair. b. Results of student course evaluations conducted during the Critical Incident Period need not be included in retention, tenure and promotion portfolios and merit raise applications if the results do not reflect a 65% or greater student participation rate in the evaluation process. c. Where student course evaluations were not conducted or were not required to be included in the retention portfolio, faculty will be held harmless for the lack of inclusion of those materials. d. Peer/Chair evaluations, where necessary according to requirements established in department criteria, must be completed per department criteria and included in retention/tenure/promotion portfolios, if the course in which the evaluation is taking place is still being conducted in the same format/modality that was listed for the course in STARS on the 1st day of the semester. Departments will be permitted to develop a Virtual Peer/Chair Evaluation Form, if deemed necessary by the majority of faculty in each department. e. When course evaluation results from during the Critical Incident Period are reported in future retention, tenure and promotion portfolios, as well as merit raise applications, evaluators must consider the likelihood that evaluations may have been negatively impacted by COVID-19. In the event of a negative decision by a portfolio reviewer, that decision must be accompanied by a statement which provides evidence of how adjustments to the conduct of the course due to COVID-19 were determined to not be a factor in the decision.
Course Evaluations. At the end of each semester, faculty must have their students complete evaluations for each section taught. All R110 student/faculty evaluations are online.
Course Evaluations. 19.1.1 In order to improve course design or teaching effectiveness, a CTF Member may conduct a written or electronic evaluation of their teaching performance in their classes provided that the students consent to participate in the survey, and provided that the procedures of the survey protect student confidentiality.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!