Court Records. If Agency chooses to execute the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment referred to in Clause 2.12 in order to access and/or submit Court Records via BCA’s systems, the following provisions regarding data practices also apply. The Court is not subject to Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 (see section 13.90) but is subject to the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. All parties acknowledge and agree that Minn. Stat. § 13.03, subdivision 4(e) requires that the BCA and the Agency comply with the Rules of Public Access for those data received from Court under the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment. All parties also acknowledge and agree that the use of, access to or submission of Court Records, as that term is defined in the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, may be restricted by rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court, applicable state statute or federal law. All parties acknowledge and agree that these applicable restrictions must be followed in the appropriate circumstances.
Court Records. Any court documents as related to a “yes” answered to questions 1 through 6 of the Personal and Professional Fitness questions on the application form. ● Deficiencies: State requirements not met for the issuance of a regular certificate.
Court Records. C6.9.1 The Service Provider shall, where required, undertake the secure movement and carriage of court, Police, the Purchaser or other Prisoner records between Premises to support efficiency within the Services, and ensure the transfer and exchange of information to appropriate authority personnel. Such document movements shall include, but not be limited to, warrants, production sheets, social enquiry reports, psychiatric reports, Prisoner healthcare information, any Suicide Risk Identification Court Form, and the PER.
Court Records. 354. The City agrees to ensure that all online court systems enable the collection of aggregated court data consistent with the court data collection and reporting requirements of this Agreement. The City will continue development of an electronic court records management system that is sufficient to reliably ensure that all case information is tracked and accessible to court officials as appropriate. The City agrees to complete development and implementation of the electronic court records management system within 180 days of the Effective Date.
Court Records. Not Maintained in the Odyssey data repository. Subject to specific permission from the Courts identified above that are not on the Odyssey Case Management System, the Division hereby grants to the Requesting Party restricted authorization to receive from such Courts the Court Records specifically identified above for the Requesting Party’s own use in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Execution of this Agreement and approval of the Requesting Party’s request by the Division does not create any mandatory obligation on the part of any Clerk of Court or Court to provide Court Records to the Requesting Party. Under Rule 9(F), the individual non-Odyssey Courts must determine on an individual basis whether resources are available to transfer the Court Records to the Requesting Party and whether fulfilling the request is an appropriate use of public resources and is consistent with the purposes of Rule 9. The Courts must determine on an individual basis whether to assess a charge for providing the Court Records may make the granting of the request contingent upon the Requesting Party paying an amount which the Court determines is the fair market value of the information.
Court Records. The constitutions of Utah and of the United States protect the people’s right to an open and public court. Anyone can attend most court hearings, and anyone can view and obtain a copy of most court records. However, the people who do business with the courts—parties, witnesses, victims, jurors, and others—have rights of privacy also protected by our state and federal constitutions. Neither right is absolute; each is balanced by the other. Still, to participate in the judicial process, people sacrifice a good deal of their privacy. It is a sacrifice necessary to protect the integrity and accountability of the courts.
