DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Sample Clauses

DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 1. The A/E will be required to submit the plans, specifications, and calculations (UTS requested) for review to UTH at the intervals outlined in Appendix L of these Guidelines. Intermediate reviews may be required if the scope of the project has been changed or if an earlier review found the plans and specifications unacceptable either as a whole or part. All items submitted shall be in compliance with the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Rule 138.138(8) regarding signatures and engineer’s seal. 2. The Civil Engineering Consultant(s) will participate in all reviews, work sessions and presentations where this discipline is involved. Items to be included for review at each phase or stage of completion are outlined below:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. ‌ 1. The A/E will be required to present the plans and specifications for review to UTH at the intervals outlined in the A/E Agreement. Intermediate reviews may be required if the scope of the project has been changed or if an earlier review found the plans and specifications unacceptable either as a whole or in part. 2. The Electrical Engineering consultant(s) will participate in all reviews, work sessions and presentations where this discipline is involved. Items outlined below are to be included for review at each phase or stage of completion. 3. UTH Project Name and Number, north arrows, and graphic scales on drawings. 4. Engineered drawings are required to include the engineering firm’s Texas Registration number and the engineer of record’s Texas PE number. 5. Schematic Design – Refer to Appendix L 6. Design Development – Refer to Appendix L 7. Construction Documents: a. Interim - 50% CD stage presentation: (1) Review of specifications using tracked changes for any modifications made to UTH base specifications. (2) Overall progress made to DD documents prior to those listed for 75% CD. b. Interim - 75% CD stage presentation: (1) All electrical distribution equipment located. (2) Complete lighting and light switching layouts. (3) Lights, receptacles and equipment requiring electric power circuited, but circuit numbering may not be complete. (4) Fixture schedule complete. (5) Electrical symbols schedule complete. (6) Site plan, all services detailed. (7) Panel schedules nearly complete. (8) Separate grounding system design complete. (9) Electrical details nearly complete. (10) One-line or riser diagram complete, except final sizing of protection, transformers and feeders depending upon final mechanical equipment selections. (11) Updated load analysis accurate to 75% CDs. (12) Reflected ceiling plans to match architecture’s. (13) Specifications complete. c. Final - 100% Submittal: (1) Design complete. Corrections required from Final Review Comments to be included on either another final submittal or as addenda, depending upon the extent and severity of comments. (2) Engineer of Record’s seal shall be on all drawings.
DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. ‌ 1. The A/E will be required to present the plans and specifications for review to UTH at the intervals outlined in the A/E Agreement. Intermediate reviews may be required if the scope of the project has been changed or if an earlier review found the plans and specifications unacceptable either as a whole or in part. 2. The Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Engineering consultant(s) will participate in all reviews, work sessions and presentations where this discipline is involved. Items to be included for review at each phase or stage of completion are outlined below. 3. Schematic Design: Refer to Appendix L. 4. Design Development: Refer to Appendix L.
DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 1. The A/E will be required to present the plans and specifications for review to CPO at the intervals outlined in the A/E Agreement. Intermediate reviews may be required if the scope of the project has been changed or if an earlier review found the plans and specifications unacceptable either as a whole or in part. 2. The Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Engineering consultant(s) will participate in all reviews, work sessions and presentations where this discipline is involved. Items to be included for review at each phase or stage of completion are outlined below. 3. Schematic Design: Refer to Appendix L. 4. Design Development: Refer to Appendix L.

Related to DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submittal Requirements To comply with Subsection 4.1, Consultant shall submit the following: a. Certificate of Liability Insurance in the amounts specified in the section; and b. Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement as required by the section.

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Periodic Review of Costs of Environmental Compliance In the ordinary course of its business, the Company conducts a periodic review of the effect of Environmental Laws on the business, operations and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, in the course of which it identifies and evaluates associated costs and liabilities (including, without limitation, any capital or operating expenditures required for clean-up, closure of properties or compliance with Environmental Laws or any permit, license or approval, any related constraints on operating activities and any potential liabilities to third parties). On the basis of such review and the amount of its established reserves, the Company has reasonably concluded that such associated costs and liabilities would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Drawings and Specifications 9.1 A complete list of all Drawings that form a part of the Contract Documents are to be found as an index on the Drawings themselves, and/or may be provided to Developer and/or in the Table of Contents. 9.2 Materials or Work described in words that so applied have a well-known technical or trade meaning shall be deemed to refer to recognized standards, unless noted otherwise. 9.3 Trade Name or Trade Term It is not the intention of the Contract Documents to go into detailed descriptions of any materials and/or methods commonly known to the trade under “trade name” or “trade term.” The mere mention or notation of “trade name” or “trade term” shall be considered a sufficient notice to Developer that it will be required to complete the work so named, complete, finished, and operable, with all its appurtenances, according to the best practices of the trade. 9.4 The naming of any material and/or equipment shall mean furnishing and installing of same, including all incidental and accessory items thereto and/or labor therefor, as per best practices of the trade(s) involved, unless specifically noted otherwise. 9.5 Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by one shall be binding as if called for by all. As such, Drawings and Specifications are intended to be fully cooperative and to agree. However, if Developer observes that Drawings and Specifications are in conflict with the Contract Documents, Developer shall promptly notify District and Architect in writing, and any necessary changes shall be made as provided in the Contract Documents. 9.6 Figured dimensions shall be followed in preference to scaled dimensions, and Developer shall make all additional measurements necessary for the work and shall be responsible for their accuracy. Before ordering any material or doing any work, each Developer shall verify all measurements at the building and shall be responsible for the correctness of same. 9.7 Should any question arise concerning the intent or meaning of the Contract Documents, including the Plans and Specifications, the question shall be submitted to the District for interpretation. If a conflict exists in the Contract Documents, these Construction Provisions shall control over the Facilities Lease, which shall control over the Site Lease, which shall control over Division 1 Documents, which shall control over Division 2 through Division 49 documents, which shall control over figured dimensions, which shall control over large-scale drawings, which shall control over small-scale drawings. In no case shall a document calling for lower quality and/or quantity of material or workmanship control. However, in the case of discrepancy or ambiguity solely between and among the Drawings and Specifications, the discrepancy or ambiguity shall be resolved in favor of the interpretation that will provide District with the functionally complete and operable Project described in the Drawings and Specifications. 9.8 Drawings and Specifications are intended to comply with all laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations of constituted authorities having jurisdiction, and where referred to in the Contract Documents, the laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations shall be considered as a part of the Contract Documents within the limits specified. 9.9 As required by Section 4-317(c), Part 1, Title 24, CCR: “Should any existing conditions such as deterioration or non-complying construction be discovered which is not covered by the DSA-approved documents wherein the finished work will not comply with Title 24, California Code of Regulations, a construction change document, or a separate set of plans and specifications, detailing and specifying the required repair work shall be submitted to and approved by DSA before proceeding with the repair work.”

  • Construction Reports Each Constructing Entity shall issue reports to each other Construction Party on a monthly basis, and at such other times as reasonably requested, regarding the status of the construction and installation of the Interconnection Facilities. Each Construction Party shall promptly identify, and shall notify each other Construction Party of, any event that the Construction Party reasonably expects may delay completion, or may significantly increase the cost, of the Interconnection Facilities. Should a Construction Party report such an event, Transmission Provider shall, within fifteen days of such notification, convene a technical meeting of the Construction Parties to evaluate schedule alternatives.

  • Acceptance Tests 11.1 If the Contract provides acceptance tests for Goods and/or the result of Services after their completion and/or delivery to the Purchaser, the acceptance shall only be considered as definitive when such tests have demonstrated the compliance of the Goods and/or the result of the Services to the requirements in the Contract. 11.2 Where the Contract provides for an acceptance procedure in the presence of both parties, at the successful completion of such procedure, the Purchaser shall issue the Supplier with an acceptance certificate which shall authorise the Supplier to invoice the Purchaser for any payment due on such acceptance. 11.3 The Purchaser shall at its discretion be entitled to issue and acceptancecertificate with reserves. The Supplier shall be obliged to remedy any non-conformities within the period set out in the acceptance certificate. Any payment which would otherwise have been due on acceptance may be withheld by the Purchaser in whole or part until the non- conformities underlying the reserves have been remedied.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Program Compliance The School Board shall be responsible for monitoring the program to provide technical assistance and to ensure program compliance.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!