Discipline On Standards Sample Clauses

Discipline On Standards. In Arbitration Board Case No. 1664 the Impartial Chairperson said that "the mere presence of proof of failure to meet a rate of production requires the Chairperson to approve the propriety of discipline unless, by some means other than a showing of non-compliance with Sections (46)-(48) (now Section (4.1)) it is established that the fault did not lie with the employee." Nevertheless, the undersigned agree that the provisions of Section (44) (c) of the National Production and Maintenance Agreement dated November 2, 1961, give the Arbitration Board power and authority to determine the propriety of the penalty imposed by management in disciplinary discharges and layoffs for violation of Letter (4.2), Work Standards, of said Agreement, and that the mere presence of proof of an employee's failure to meet a disputed work standard does not require the Arbitration Board or the Chairperson to approve the propriety of the discipline assessed to an employee. The disposition of any such case shall be on the merits but shall not involve the propriety of any disputed work standard or work load assignment performed by the grievant or grievants. In any such determination, the Arbitration Board will take into consideration any relevant facts occurring prior and subsequent to the time the penalty in question was imposed. This letter shall not be construed to limit or otherwise impair any right Section (1.2) reserves to the Company, including the right to establish and maintain work standards or rates of production and to discipline employees. (c99) (4.1) Work Standards (a) Establishing Work Standards 1. When the Company establishes work standards, by whatever method it may select, it shall do so on the basis of fairness and equity in that such standard shall be based on the reasonable working capacities of normal experienced employees working at a normal pace to produce quality work in the manner that the Company prescribes. 2. When a work standard is established and is not disputed, or is disputed and settled, such standard shall remain unchanged and not subject to dispute unless and until the operation is changed as a result of change in method, layout, tools, equipment, materials or product design. When a change is made in a work standard for any of the above reasons, only the elements of the operations that are affected by such change will be adjusted. Job assignment changes shall be made on the day shift with advance notice given to the Union regarding changing standar...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Discipline On Standards. In Appeal Board Case No. 1664 the Impartial Chairman said that "the mere presence of proof of failure to meet a rate of production requires the Chairman to approve the propriety of discipline unless, by some means other than a showing of non-compliance with Sections (46)-(48) (now Section (44)) it is established that the fault did not lie with the employee." Nevertheless, the undersigned agree that the provisions of Section (44) (c) of the National Production and Maintenance Agreement dated November 2, 1961, give the Appeal Board power and authority to determine the propriety of the penalty imposed by management in disciplinary discharges and layoffs for violation of Section (59), Work Standards, of said Agreement, and that the mere presence of proof of an employee's failure to meet a disputed work standard does not require the Appeal Board or the Chairman to approve the propriety of the discipline assessed to an employee. The disposition of any such case shall be on the merits but shall not involve the propriety of any disputed work standard or work load assignment performed by the grievant or grievants. In any such determination, the Appeal Board will take into consideration any relevant facts occurring prior and subsequent to the time the penalty in question was imposed. This letter shall not be construed to limit or otherwise impair any right Section (2) reserves to the Corporation, including the right to establish and maintain work standards or rates of production and to discipline employees.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Discipline On Standards. In Arbitration Board Case No. 1664 the Impartial Chairperson said that "the mere presence of proof of failure to meet a rate of production requires the Chairperson to approve the propriety of discipline unless, by some means other than a showing of non-compliance with Sections (46)-
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Discipline On Standards. In Appeal Board Case No. 1664 the Impartial Chairman said that "the mere presence of proof of failure to meet a rate of production requires the Chairman to approve the propriety of discipline unless, by some means other than a showing of non-compliance with Sections (46)-(48) (now Section (44)) it is established that the fault did not lie with the employee." Nevertheless, the undersigned agree that the provisions of Section (44) (c) of the National Production and Maintenance Agreement dated November 2, 1961, give the Appeal Board power and authority to determine the propriety of the penalty imposed by management in disciplinary discharges and layoffs for violation of Section (59), Work Standards, of said Agreement, and that the mere presence of proof of an employee's failure to meet a disputed work standard does not require the Appeal Board or the Chairman to approve the propriety of the discipline assessed to an employee.
Sample 1

Related to Discipline On Standards

  • Reformulation Standards A “reformulated” product (a) contains lead in concentrations that do not exceed 90 parts per million, equivalent to 0.009%, in any exterior parts analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methodologies 3050B and 6010B, or (b) yields a result of no more than 1.0 micrograms of lead when sampled according to NIOSH 9100 protocol and analyzed according to EPA 6010B. In addition to the above tests, the Settling Entity may use equivalent methods utilized by any California or federal agency to determine lead content in a solid substance or the amount of the bioavailability of the toxicant through a wipe test, respectively.

  • Construction Standards The Developer shall construct the Subdivision in accordance with the Subdivision Plan, as approved by the Planning Commission, and if applicable, the requirements of the Design Review Committee, and in accordance with the requirements of (a) the Millington Subdivision Regulations; (b) standards and specifications contained in “Local Public Works Standard, and Specifications”, as amended to include specific requirements for construction in Millington, TN; (c) the Building Code (as adopted by Shelby County); (d) the Fire Code (as adopted by Shelby County); (e) the Millington Zoning Ordinance; and (f) the applicable Ordinances of the City. Items (a) through (f) are hereby made a part of this Agreement by reference and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Codes”. References herein to the Codes are to those in effect on the Effective Date unless amendments are hereafter made which apply to all improvements or subdivisions regardless of their date of commencement and/or completion of construction. The Conditions of Approval established by the Planning Commission, and, as applicable, the Design Review Committee (any or all of which as may have been modified by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen) are set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Agreement and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

  • Quality Standards Each Party agrees that the nature and quality of its products and services supplied in connection with the other Party's Marks will conform to quality standards set by the other Party. Each Party agrees to supply the other Party, upon request, with a reasonable number of samples of any Materials publicly disseminated by such Party which utilize the other Party's Marks. Each Party will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and customs and obtain any required government approvals pertaining to use of the other Party's marks.

  • OMB Standards Unless specified otherwise within this agreement, the Subrecipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR 84.40−48.

  • STANDARDS OF DISCIPLINE 18.1 In order of severity, the usual types of disciplinary action are as follows: - oral reprimand, - written reprimand - suspension - demotion - termination of employment 18.2 When an employee is required to attend a meeting, the purpose of which is to investigate a disciplinary matter concerning the employee or to render a disciplinary decision concerning the employee, the employee is entitled to have, upon request, a representative of the Association attend the meeting. Where practicable, the employee shall receive a minimum of two (2) day’s notice of such a meeting and shall be informed of the reason for it. 18.3 When an employee is suspended from duty, demoted or terminated due to a disciplinary infraction, the Council shall notify the employee, in writing, of the reason(s) for the suspension, demotion or termination. The Council shall endeavour to provide this written notification at the time of the suspension, demotion or termination. 18.4 When an employee feels aggrieved by the application of any disciplinary action which was applied, or in the employee’s opinion was applied, to the employee by the Council, the employee may present a grievance in accordance with the Grievance Procedure Article of this Agreement. 18.5 Except in the case of an oral reprimand, the Council shall provide an employee with a written record of any disciplinary action taken by the Council against the employee after the date of signing of this Agreement, and such written record shall include the reason for the disciplinary action. 18.6 The Council agrees not to introduce as evidence in a hearing relating to disciplinary action any document from the file of an employee, the existence of which the employee was not aware at the time of filing or within a reasonable period thereafter. 18.7 The Council agrees not to introduce as evidence in an adjudication hearing any document from the file of an employee where the employee was not aware of its existence: 18.7.1 at the time of requesting the services of an adjudicator or 18.7.2 within a period of five (5) consecutive working days after the Council has been informed that the employee has requested the services of an adjudicator, whichever occurs later. 18.8 Notice of disciplinary action which may have been placed on the Council staff file of an employee following the date of signing of this Agreement shall be removed from the Council staff file of the employee after two (2) years have elapsed since the disciplinary action was taken provided that no further disciplinary action has been recorded during the two (2) year period. This two (2) year period will automatically be extended by the length of any period of leave without pay in excess of three (3) months.

  • Standards for Determining Commercial Reasonableness Borrower and Silicon agree that a sale or other disposition (collectively, "sale") of any Collateral which complies with the following standards will conclusively be deemed to be commercially reasonable: (i) Notice of the sale is given to Borrower at least seven days prior to the sale, and, in the case of a public sale, notice of the sale is published at least seven days before the sale in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the sale is to be conducted; (ii) Notice of the sale describes the collateral in general, non-specific terms; (iii) The sale is conducted at a place designated by Silicon, with or without the Collateral being present; (iv) The sale commences at any time between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m; (v) Payment of the purchase price in cash or by cashier's check or wire transfer is required; (vi) With respect to any sale of any of the Collateral, Silicon may (but is not obligated to) direct any prospective purchaser to ascertain directly from Borrower any and all information concerning the same. Silicon shall be free to employ other methods of noticing and selling the Collateral, in its discretion, if they are commercially reasonable.

  • Contractor Standards Contractor shall comply with Contractor Standards provisions codified in the SDMC. Contractor understands and agrees that violation of Contractor Standards may be considered a material breach of the Contract and may result in Contract termination, debarment, and other sanctions.

  • Service Level Standards In addition to all other requirements in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Best Claims Practices & Estimating Guidelines, Vendor shall use reasonable and good faith efforts to meet the Service Level Standards set forth below.

  • Performance Standards The Contractor agrees to perform all tasks and provide deliverables as set forth in the Contract. The Department and the Customer will be entitled at all times, upon request, to be advised as to the status of work being done by the Contractor and of the details thereof.

  • Ethical Standards ‌ 7.8.1 Within ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, Developer shall adopt written policies establishing ethical standards of conduct for all Developer-Related Entities, including Developer’s supervisory and management personnel, in dealing with (a) IFA and the Department and (b) employment relations. Such policy shall be subject to review and comment by IFA prior to adoption. Such policy shall include standards of ethical conduct concerning the following: 7.8.1.1 Restrictions on gifts and contributions to, and lobbying of, IFA, the Department and any of their respective members, commissioners, directors, officers and employees, and elected State officials; 7.8.1.2 Protection of employees from unethical practices in selection, use, hiring, compensation or other terms and conditions of employment, or in firing, promotion and termination of employees; 7.8.1.3 Protection of employees from retaliatory actions (including discharge, demotion, suspension, threat, harassment, pay reduction or other discrimination in the terms and conditions of employment) in response to reporting of illegal (including the making of a false claim), unethical or unsafe actions or failures to act by any Developer-Related Entity; 7.8.1.4 Restrictions on directors, members, officers or supervisory or management personnel of any Developer-Related Entity engaging in any transaction or activity, including receiving or offering a financial incentive, benefit, loan or other financial interest, that is, or to a reasonable person appears to be, in conflict with or incompatible with the proper discharge of duties or independence of judgment or action in the performance of duties, or adverse to the interests of the Project or employees; 7.8.1.5 Restrictions on use of office or job position for a purpose that is, or would to a reasonable person appear to be, primarily for the private benefit of a director, member, officer or supervisory or management person, rather than primarily for the benefit of Developer or the Project, or primarily to achieve a private gain or an exemption from duty or responsibility for a director, member, officer or supervisory or management person; and 7.8.1.6 Restrictions on directors, members, officers or employees of any Developer-Related Entity performing any of the Work if the performance of such services would be prohibited under IFA’s conflict of interest rules and policies. 7.8.2 Developer shall cause its directors, members, officers and supervisory and management personnel, and require those of all other Developer-Related Entities, to adhere to and enforce the adopted policy on ethical standards of conduct. Developer shall establish reasonable systems and procedures to promote and monitor compliance with the policy. 7.8.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing in this Section 7.8, Developer has an affirmative obligation under this Agreement to disclose to IFA and to the Indiana State Ethics Commission when an interested party is or becomes an employee of IFA or the State. This obligation extends only to those facts that Developer knows or reasonably could know. For purposes of this Section 7.8.3, “interested party” means (a) the individual executing this Agreement, (b) an individual who has an interest of three percent (3%) or more of Developer, (c) any member of the immediate family of an individual specified in clause (a) or (b). For purposes of the preceding sentence, “immediate family” means the spouse and the unemancipated children of an individual.‌