Empirical Evidence Sample Clauses

Empirical Evidence empirical evidence underlying and supporting key ------------------ financial assumptions, judgments, and calculations such as:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Empirical Evidence empirical evidence underlying and supporting key ------------------ financial assumptions, judgments, and calculations such as: i) Market Statistics: a discussion of and market trading statistics ----------------- for companies the valuer considers to be relevant and that the valuer uses in arriving at the valuation conclusion; where market trading statistics are used, disclosure should include at least the following: - date(s) of the actual market price data; and - the particular statistics used (such as earnings/cash flow/ book value multiples, yields, etc.).
Empirical Evidence. Implications for Vietnam 1. Diversified business groups in Vietnam 1. Vietnam National Coal-Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Limited (Vinacomin) 2. Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group (VNPT) 3. Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group (PetroVietnam) 4. Vietnam Electricity Corporation (EVN) 5. Vinashin Business Group (Vinashin) 6. Vietnam National Textile and Garment Group (Vinatex) 7. Vietnam Rubber Group (VRG) 8. Vietnam Finance – Insurance Group (Bao Viet) 9. Viettel Mobile Telecommunications Group (Viettel) 10. Vietnam National Chemical Group (Vinachem) 11. Vietnam National Petroleum Group (Petrolimex) inefficient (Xxxx and Xxxxxx 2008). The privatization program, officially called ‘Equitization Program’ (co xxxx xxx) commenced in 1992 when the number of SEOs in Vietnam had declined by 47 percent to around 6,500 enterprises (Vu 2006). On July 3, 1994, the Prime Minister issued Decision No. 90 and Decision No. 91 to establish general corporations (Xxxx Son 2012). The formation of General Corporations (GCs) — collections of smaller SOEs — was institutionalized in the 1995 and 2001 Vietnamese Law on Enterprises. As of 2005, Vietnam had 18 GCs operating –“5 in public utilities and business services, 4 in mining and agriculture, and 9 in manufacturing” (Abegaz 2005, 16). In 2005, some general corporations were organized into business groups. Vietnam National Coal-Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Limited (Vinacomin) was the first business group to be established on December 26, 2005. From 2005 to 2011, thirteen business groups have come into existence. In 2011, there were 13 business groups and 96 general corporations operating in the form of parent and subsidiary companies. State-owned enterprises dominate the key sectors, including oil and gas (PetroVN), electricity (EVN), shipbuilding (Vinashin), petroleum (Petrolimex) (Nhat Binh 2012a). There are also 96 state-owned corporations with thousands of subsidiaries. On October 2, 2012, Prime Minister Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxx approved the decision to dismantle two pilot business groups: Vietnam Industrial Construction Corporation (VNIC) and Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUD Holdings). With the new decision of the Prime Minister, there are now 11 business groups. In the next few years, only five to six business groups will be allowed to operate, and thus seven or eight business groups will be returned to their ministries. Vietnam’s group formation was inspired by qiye jituan in China and chaebols...

Related to Empirical Evidence

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Categories of Evidence Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement, judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice, including unannounced observations of practice of any duration; and additional evidence relevant to one or more Standards of Effective Teaching Practice (603 CMR 35.03).

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Title Evidence Seller agrees to share equally with Buyer the closing agent costs and the cost of a title insurance company’s commitment and standard ALTA form owner’s policy (except survey matters) to the Property, showing a marketable title vested in Seller, subject to easements, restrictions, covenants, and other matters of record. Any endorsements shall be paid solely by Buyer. The title evidence shall be presented to prospective Buyer on day of auction. Buyer acknowledges: (a) receipt of the title commitment prior to entering into this agreement; (b) review of the title commitment to the Buyer’s full satisfaction; and (c) waiver of any right to object to any exceptions listed therein. If Seller fails to satisfy all such title requirements imposed on Seller pursuant to title commitment, Buyer may, as its sole remedy and at Buyer’s election, either: (a) cancel this agreement and receive a return of Buyer’s xxxxxxx money and, in that event, this Agreement will be canceled and the parties will have no further obligations to each other; or (b) accept such title as Seller can deliver. Buyer waives any right to seek specific performance or to seek damages from Seller.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!