Entry of Final Judgment. There is no just reason to delay the entry of this
Entry of Final Judgment. There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order and Final Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed.
Entry of Final Judgment. If, after the Final Approval Hearing scheduled by the Settlement Court in the Preliminary Approval Order, the Settlement Court approves this Agreement, then Settlement Class Counsel shall request that the Settlement Court enter an Order and Final Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), and that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Order and Final Judgment.
Entry of Final Judgment. If the MDL Court gives Final Approval to this Agreement following the Final Fairness Hearing, counsel for the Parties shall request that the MDL Court enter a Final Approval Order, including the Court’s express determination under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) that there is no just reason for delay and directing that separate judgments with respect to all claims by Settlement Class Members of Classes 1 and 3 be deemed as final judgments and that all claims with respect to Class 2 except the carved out claims be deemed as final judgments.
Entry of Final Judgment. At the Final Fairness Hearing, Plaintiffs will request that the Court enter a Final Judgment, and Defendants will concur in said request.
Entry of Final Judgment. Plaintiffs will request that the Court (a) grant Final Approval and (b) enter judgment in accordance with this Agreement, substantially in the form of Exhibit E, approving the Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and binding on all Class Members who have not excluded themselves, ordering that the Claim Payments be paid to Eligible Claimants (as set forth below in Paragraph 4.06), ordering that attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and Representative Plaintiff service awards be paid in the amount approved by the Court, approving the form of notice provided by Newsvine, dismissing the Action with prejudice, and barring Class Members from bringing claims within the scope of the Released Claims.
Entry of Final Judgment. The Final Judgment shall have been entered or established by settlement agreement and Agent shall have received satisfactory evidence of (i) such entry or settlement, (ii) the amount of Borrower's and each other Credit Party's liability with respect thereto, (iii) the amount and timing of any proceeds of insurance, indemnification or contribution expected to be received by Borrower and each of the other Credit Parties with respect thereto and (iv) the aggregate amount of accrued and unpaid expenses (including, without limitation, legal fees) incurred by the Credit Parties with respect to the DEI Litigation as of the Term Loan B Funding Date.
Entry of Final Judgment. There is no just reason to delay entry of this Final 4 Approval Order and Judgment as a final judgment with respect to the claims asserted in the 9 SO ORDERED this day of , 2019. 10 The Xxxxxxxxx Xxx X. Tigar 12 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 The case is called Terraza v. Safeway Inc., et al., No. 3:16-cv-03994-JST (N.D. Cal.). A Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. This Notice advises you of the settlement (“Settlement”) of a lawsuit against Safeway Inc. (“Safeway”), the Benefit Plans Committee of Safeway Inc. n/k/a Albertsons Companies Retirement Benefits Plans Committee (“BPC”), certain current and former members of the BPC (collectively, the “Safeway Defendants”), and Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting, Inc. (“Aon”) (the Safeway Defendants and Aon are collectively referred to as the “Defendants”). In the lawsuit, Plaintiff Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (“Plaintiff Terraza”) and Class Representative Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendants violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) by, among other things, failing to perform proper oversight of the Safeway Inc. 401(k) Plan (“Plan”). Defendants deny these allegations and deny that they engaged in any improper conduct. You should read this entire Notice carefully because your legal rights will be affected by whether you act or not. Your rights and options, and the deadline for you to object if you are opposed to the Settlement, are explained in this Notice.
1. Why did I get this notice? 1
2. What is this lawsuit about? 1
3. What is a class action lawsuit? 1
4. Why is there a Settlement? 2
5. How do I get more information about the Settlement? 2
6. Who will administer the Settlement? 2
Entry of Final Judgment. There is no just reason to delay the entry of this Judgment as a final judgment over the Derivative Claims in the Action. Accordingly, the Register in Chancery is expressly directed to immediately enter this final judgment in the Action. Vice Chancellor Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx III EFiled: Mar 10 E20X2H2 I0B9:I2T4AM EST This Amendment (this “Amendment”), dated March 9, 2022, hereby amends the Third Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”) of Xxxxxx Energy LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), pursuant to those certain written consents dated as of the date hereof approving this Amendment by the Board of Governors of the Company and the holder of a majority of the voting power of the Members of the Company, by adding the following sentence at the end of Section 5.14 thereof: “Within twenty-four (24) hours after the effectiveness of any action taken under this Section 5.14, notice of such action shall be provided to any Governor(s) who did not approve such action.”
Entry of Final Judgment. It is hereby adjudged, decreed, and ordered that Plaintiffs have a judgment against Kroll in the amount of twenty-four million dollars ($24,000,000.00). The Court expressly finds and determines that there is no just reason for any delay in the entry of this final judgment, which is both final and appealable, and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed. Any appeal from this Bar Order and Judgment or any part of it must be taken within sixty (60) days after entry of this Bar Order and Judgment, and in compliance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The judgment entered pursuant to this Bar Order and Judgment is subject to the Bankruptcy Court Approval Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on , 000 XXXXX X. XXXXXX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UPON READING (a) the Notice of Application dated [ ]; (b) the [ th] Affidavit of Marcus Wide[ ] sworn on [ ]; and (c) the global settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into as of 15 December 2015 between and among, on the one hand, (i) Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx, solely in his capacity as the receiver (the “Receiver”) for Xxxxxx Xxxxx Stanford and other persons and entities pursuant to the orders of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “U.S. Court”) entered on 17 February 2009, 12 March 2009, and 19 July 2010 in Securities and Exchange Commission x. Xxxxxxxx International Bank, Ltd. et al., No. 3:09-cv-00298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”); (ii) the Official Stanford Investors Committee, as defined in the order of the U.S. Court entered 10 August 2010 in the SEC Action (the “Committee”); and (iii) Xxxxxx X. Wide and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, in their capacities as the joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank Limited (in Liquidation) (“SIB”) (the “Joint Liquidators”); and, on the other hand, (iv) Kroll, LLC (f/k/a Kroll Inc.) and Xxxxx Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Kroll”), which defines a settlement (the “Settlement”); U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Court Appointed Examiner and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “DOJ Settlement Agreement”); AND UPON HEARING counsel for the Applicant [ ] of [ ]; It is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The terms of the Agreement as attached at Appendix “A” to this Order are approved.
2. This Court hereby defers implementation of the Agreement and the Settlement, the Scheduling Order, and the Bar Order and Judgment defined therein, to the U.S. Court.
3. The costs of this a...
