Equitable Selection Process Sample Clauses

Equitable Selection Process. If the initial capacity of HCCS is insufficient to enroll all prospective students, or if the capacity is insufficient to enroll all prospective students in subsequent school years, then the Governing Board shall determine the students who will be offered admission to HCCS by conducting a lottery. The selection procedure, unless otherwise determined by the Governing Board and then approved by the school’s authorizer, shall be conducted as follows: The name of each prospective student on the proposed attendance list shall be individually affixed to or written on a three by five (3x5) inch index card. The index cards shall be separated by grade. The selection procedure shall be conducted one (1) grade level at a time, with the order of grade levels selected randomly. The index cards containing the names of the prospective students for the grade level being selected shall be placed into a single container. A neutral, third party shall draw the grade level to be completed first and then draw each index card from the container for that grade level, and such person shall write the selection number on each index card as drawn, beginning with the numeral “1” and continuing sequentially thereafter. In addition, after selecting each index card, the name of the person selected will be compared to the proposed attendance list to determine whether any preferences are applicable to such person. If the name of the person selected is a returning student, then the letter “A” shall be written on such index card. If the name of the person selected is the child of a founder or full-time employee, the letter “B” shall be written on such index card. If the name of the person selected is the sibling of another student that has already been selected for admission to the public charter school, the letter “C” shall be written on such index card. If the name of the person selected resides in the primary attendance area of the public charter school, then the letter “D” shall be written on such index card. If the name of the person selected resides outside the primary attendance area of HCCS, then the letter “E” shall be written on such index card. With regard to the sibling preference, if the name of the person selected has a sibling in a higher grade who has already been selected, but the person previously selected did not have the letter “C” written on his or her index card (because a sibling had not been selected for admission prior to the selection of the index card of that perso...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Equitable Selection Process. If the initial capacity of TCPCS is insufficient to enroll all prospective students, or if capacity is insufficient to enroll all prospective students in subsequent school years, then TCPCS will determine who will be offered admission to TCPCS by conducting a fair and equitable selection process. The selection process may be conducted as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Equitable Selection Process. If the initial capacity of Palouse Prairie School is insufficient to enroll all prospective students, or if capacity is insufficient to enroll all prospective students in subsequent school years, then Palouse Prairie School shall determine the students who will be offered admission by conducting a fair and equitable selection process in accordance with the Idaho State Board of Education Model Admission Procedures and Idaho Code 33-5205(3)(j).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Equitable Selection Process. If the initial capacity of Xavier Charter School is insufficient to enroll all prospective students, or if capacity is insufficient to enroll all prospective students in subsequent school years, then Xxxxxx will determine who will be offered admission to Xavier by conducting a fair and equitable lottery selection process.
Sample 1
Equitable Selection Process. The selection procedure, unless otherwise determined by the Board of Trustees and then approved by the school authorizer, shall be conducted as follows: Each new student name will be placed into an electronic spreadsheet along with necessary contact information to conduct the lottery and communicate the results. This information includes enrollment preference, grade level, student name, and parent contact information. A random number will be generated for each student name on the spreadsheet. The list will then be sorted first by grade level, then by enrollment preference and finally by random number, with the names with the lowest random number having the highest preference. Students shall be offered admission to Academy, in order of preference, until all seats for that grade are filled. With regard to founder and full-time employee preference, if the number of category B students exceeds ten percent (10%) of the total capacity of The Academy Charter, then all category B students will be pre-sorted by random number before conducting the admissions lottery. Those falling outside the 10% limit will be re-assigned to category C, whereupon the lottery will be conducted as previously described. Notification & Acceptance Process The Academy will comply with Idaho State Board of Education Rules Governing s IDAPA
Sample 1
Equitable Selection Process. Sage International School will comply with Idaho State Board of Education Rules Governing Public Charter Schools IDAPA 08.02.04 for the Equitable Selection Process. Final Selection List Sage International School will comply with Idaho State Board of Education Rules Governing Public Charter Schools IDAPA 08.02.04 for the Final Selection List. Notification and Acceptance Process. Sage International School will comply with Idaho State Board of Education Rules Governing Public Charter Schools IDAPA 08.02.04 for the Notification and Acceptance Process. Subsequent School Years Sage International School will comply with Idaho State Board of Education Rules Governing Public Charter Schools IDAPA 08.02.04 for Subsequent School Years. Enrollment Capacity of the Charter School: Sage International School’s enrollment is capped at 1,200 students in grades K-12th. Annually, no less than two (2) months prior to Sage International School’s lottery application deadline, the Board of Directors will establish, at it’s regularly scheduled meeting, by motion and vote, an ‘Annual Enrollment Capacity’, as follows: Based on recommendations from the Administration, the Board will establish: (1) an annual school-wide enrollment capacity not to exceed 1,200 students; and
Sample 1

Related to Equitable Selection Process

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Mediation Process A. Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that may be requested by the City or the PBA. It is an alternative, not a substitute for the formal arbitration process contained in Section 19.7 above. Mediation is an informal process in which a neutral third party assists the opposing parties in reaching a voluntary, negotiated resolution of a charge of discipline. The decision to mediate is completely voluntary for the PBA and the City. Mediation gives the parties the opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the charging document, clear up misunderstandings, determine the underlying interests or concerns, find areas of agreement and, ultimately, incorporate those areas of agreement into solutions. A mediator does not resolve the charge or impose a decision on the parties. Instead, the mediator helps the parties to agree on a mutually acceptable resolution. The mediation process is strictly confidential. Information disclosed during mediation will not be revealed to anyone.

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • Election Procedures Each holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock (“Holder”) shall have the right, subject to the limitations set forth in this Article II, to submit an election in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!