Equity Review Sample Clauses

The Equity Review clause establishes a process for evaluating and potentially adjusting the ownership interests or equity allocations among parties involved in an agreement. Typically, this clause outlines when and how such reviews will occur, such as at set intervals or upon the occurrence of specific events like new investments or changes in company valuation. Its core function is to ensure that equity distribution remains fair and reflective of each party's contributions or changing circumstances, thereby preventing disputes and maintaining alignment among stakeholders.
Equity Review. Equity Review—When equity surveys are conducted for SEIU classifications, the following cities will be used as benchmark agencies:  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇  Redwood City  Cupertino  San Leandro  Los Altos  San Mateo  Milpitas  Santa ▇▇▇▇▇
View SourceView Similar (4)
Equity Review. If a Nurse believes she/he was not placed on the scale at the appropriatewage rate when hired the Nurse will be given thirty (30) days from the signing of the Agreement to provide the employer with the documentation that may change the rate as referenced in the above article. The Equity Review decision shall be considered final and the grievance process is not available for this process.
View Source
Equity Review o The parties acknowledge that an appropriation of funds will be sought via Town meeting in May 2015, to conduct a municipal compensation review for the positions of the bargaining group. If the appropriation is approved, such compensation information will serve as an evaluation tool for establishing compensation for the AEA. o Effective July 1, 2016 parties agree to amend the successor agreement as follows:
View Source
Equity Review. ‌ During the term of this agreement, the City agrees to review equity concerns raised by SEIU on a case by case basis. Following a request by ▇▇▇▇, the City agrees to meet and collaboratively discuss the collected data from the City's comparable jurisdictions, (currently comprised of Paso ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Grande, San ▇▇▇▇ Obispo, Atascadero, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, Carpentaria, Goleta, Greenfield, King City, Pacific Grove, and Port Hueneme. The City retains the sole discretion to grant any equity adjustment. Such equity adjustment decisions are not subject to the grievance provision of this MOU. ARTICLE Ill - WORK PERIOD‌ The customary Work Period shall be 40 hours of actual time worked during a consecutive seven-day period commencing at 12:01 a.m. on Monday and ending at 12:00 midnight on Sunday. The 40-hour Work Period shall include time not worked because of holiday leave, but shall not include time not worked because of Vacation Leave, Compensatory Time Off, or Sick Leave. This Work Period may be changed to provide an alternative schedule which is agreeable to the City and an individual employee. 4.1 Cafeteria Plan‌‌‌
View Source
Equity Review. During the term of this agreement, the City agrees to review equity concerns raised by SEIU on a case by case basis. Following a request by SEIU, the City agrees to meet and collaboratively discuss the collected data from the City’s comparable jurisdictions, (currently comprised of Paso ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Grande, San ▇▇▇▇ Obispo, Atascadero, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, Carpenteria, Goleta, Greenfield, King City, Pacific Grove, and Port Hueneme. The City retains the sole discretion to grant any equity adjustment. Such equity adjustment decisions are not subject to the grievance provision of this MOU.
View Source
Equity Review. If an employee who was hired after July 1, 2017, believes she/he was not placed on the scale at the appropriate wage rate when hired the employee will be given thirty (30) days from the signing of the Agreement to provide the employer with the documentation that may change the rate as referenced in the above article. Employees will be limited to an additional two‐step wage adjustment.
View Source

Related to Equity Review

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Quarterly Review For a period commencing on the initial effective date of the Registration Statement and ending five years from the date of the consummation of the Business Combination or until such earlier time at which the Liquidation occurs or the Common Stock and Warrants cease to be publicly traded, the Company, at its expense, shall cause its regularly engaged independent registered public accounting firm to review (but not audit) the Company’s financial statements for each of the first three fiscal quarters prior to the announcement of quarterly financial information, the filing of the Company’s Form 10-Q quarterly report and the mailing, if any, of quarterly financial information to stockholders.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.